dark light

RadarArchive

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 841 through 855 (of 898 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Fortress Aerials #2121733
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    I don’t know about the dorsal aerial (which might be R/T?) but the dipoles down the side of the fuselage look awfully like ASV to me. These would be the transmitting aerials of a sideways-looking system. Airborne radar isn’t my speciality, and I stand to be corrected, but I’m fairly sure that’s what these aerials were.

    in reply to: PA474-The Movie!!! #2122145
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    Can I suggest that there may be another reason which contributed to the demise of Warbird Worldwide: poor advertising. I’ve never even heard of the magazine! I’m not saying I would definitely have bought it, but I might have done if I’d seen or heard of it. 😡

    in reply to: Your Air Force Relatives #2122674
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    Geoff,

    Thanks very much for that information. I knew hat not all entries had next-of-kin details, but the handful that I’d looked at since the new format was up and running hadn’t included this information. Since I hadn’t seen any that included it, I started to wonder if they’d removed it. I’m delighted to hear that’s not the case. Thanks very much for setting me straight. The CWGC website is a superb resource and long may it continue to include new features.

    in reply to: 609 Squadron #2122676
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    Re: Re: 609 Squadron

    Originally posted by SteveYoung
    I’ve not seen the article yet, but I have to say that name sounds a bit ficticious. Bob Up And Down? Or is my over-active sense of humour running away with me again…?

    That thought did go through my mind, but I thought it must just be me. Then again, perhaps not? Maybe my sense of humour isn’t so warped after all! 😉

    in reply to: Your Air Force Relatives #2122793
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    Sorry, Steve. I’m afraid my confidence was mis-placed. The new, revised CWGC website doesn’t seem to include the next-of-kin names that it used to. As a result, I’m afraid you can’t find your gran’s friend’s name, unless you want to contact the CWGC direct. Sicne such information has previously been available over the net, I don’t see how they can refuse it to you.

    in reply to: Bristol Beauforts #2122913
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    I don’t have a PPL, but I’d certainly get one just for the opportunity of joining your ‘squadron’.:)

    in reply to: Bristol Beauforts #2122972
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    In fact, I’m not just orry, but even sorry! Ooops!

    in reply to: Bristol Beauforts #2122979
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    Originally posted by Moggy C
    Close, but my dream adds a Mossie, Wellington, Whitley and Hampden.

    Moggy 🙂

    Just one Mossie?!? I’m orry, Moggy, but I fear your dreams disappoint! 😀

    in reply to: Bristol Beauforts #2123034
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    Now here’s a nice dream for you Moggy: how about a formation flypast by a restored Blenheim, a Herc-engined Beaufighter, a Merlin-engined Beaufighter and a Beaufort? I’d pay a lot of money to see that.!:D

    Unfortunately, I don’t have the sort of millions of quid required to acutally see a dream like that become reality. Pity!:(

    in reply to: Your Air Force Relatives #2123122
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    Yeah, the London Gazette website is a marvellous resource for researching the promotions and awards of servicemen but it definitely has a very odd search engine. I find it easiest to search under service number, but that rarely returns all entries. Then I try by name, but as Lancman has said you need to go with middle name and surname only. If the surname is a bit unusual it can be worth trying the surname alone. It is an invaluable source of information, but you do have to persevere.

    Having said all this, there is a possibility, Ant, that your grandfather’s service records are available at the PRO (or National Archives as they are now). Only about 40% of First World War service records have survived, but you never know, he might be one. You can check without having to visit Kew by searching under his name on the PROCAT page of the PRO website.

    in reply to: Your Air Force Relatives #2123262
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    I don’t know if it helps fill in the blanks, but Wing Commander Guy Penrose Gibson was killed on the night of 19/20 September 1944. I suspect everyone knows the story of how he was acting as Master bobmer that night for a raid on Rheydt. Anyway, with him when his Mosquito XX KB267 AZ-E crashed was Squadron Leader J B Warwick, DFC. He would be your gran’s friend’s son. A check on the CWGC website might produce his parent’s names, which would then give you your gran’s friend’s name.

    in reply to: What's wrong with this paint job? #2123432
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    Originally posted by Chad Veich
    Very true David, and I would have no problem watching either of these two birds in action.

    I take your point, but I’m not sure I could bear to watch the Wildcat. The paint job there just grates on the eyes a bit too much. It does seem odd that if you’re prepared to spend tens, if not hundreds, of thousands to buy a historic aircraft you wouldn’t want to spent a few more quid to ensure it’s painted in an authentic colour scheme, for the type if not for the individual aircraft. Still, then again if you can afford a Wildcat, you can do what ever the hell you want with it!:(

    in reply to: Your Air Force Relatives #2123433
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    Thanks for posting this, Lancman. It sounds like you’ve spent a good few happy hours listening to his stories and I for one am grateful to you for sharing this.

    I personally have no family connections to the RAF, other than very, very distant relations. However, my mother-in-law was an ATS wireless operator who worked at various Y radio interception stations and received Fish traffic (the code even more secret than Enigma which the Colossus machines were developed at Bletchley for). Needless to say, the mother-in-law had an interesting war!

    in reply to: Squadron Leader S A D Lane #2124737
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    S/Ldr Lane isn’t listed in Bomber Command Losses, Fighter Command Losses or the entries in The Battle of Britain Then and Now. Whilst it’s possible he was in Coastal Command or another Command, it seems likely that this was a non-flying fatality. This, unfortunately, doesn’t really take things forward very much, but perhaps it’s helpful to at least rule some things out.

    in reply to: more Leuchars pics #2079812
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    Originally posted by Merlin3945
    East Fortunes display which was a couple of staff sitting there.

    Thanks for the details of the display, Scott. It sounds like it is a bit more balanaced than it has been in the past, although I suspect Leuchars are still charging too much for the exhibition space if they’re still having to pad it out a bit.

    It’s interesting to know that East Fortune had a stand there – I hadn’t heard they were going to do that. From past experience I suspect the two staff were probably there to try and sell NMS memberships, rather than to promote the Museum of Flight!

Viewing 15 posts - 841 through 855 (of 898 total)