dark light

George J

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 434 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • George J
    Participant

    It would be interesting to know more about the men who flew these planes. After all its always been argued that its the ‘man behind the machine’ that really counts.

    What was the pilot mix in the two planes? Did the IAF field Wing. Co’s and Flt. Lt? Or was it top heavy?

    Err whats the rank/experience comparison between the two AF?
    Capt USAF=Flt. Lt IAF?
    ? USAF= Sqd. Ldr. IAF?
    Col USAF=Wing. Co. IAF?
    Maj USAF= Air Comm. IAF?

    Who was the seniormost USAF F-15 driver? I am assuming that the CO of No.24 flew in these exercises…he is certainly pictured.
    ________
    Ford C1 platform
    ________
    Lincoln continental mark iv picture

    in reply to: Soviet/Russian Oddball designs #2683914
    George J
    Participant

    What no Ikky???
    You cant have a russian design thread with no Caspian Sea Monster, thats like having tea with no milk and sugar….zimbly unholy.

    http://foxxaero.homestead.com/files/lun_dr.jpg
    ________
    glass bong
    ________
    Suzuki Rgv500 History

    in reply to: Gripen to Pakistan? #2687205
    George J
    Participant

    I was under the assumption that first few MKIs rolling out from HAL will b assembled from russian supplied kits, whereas indianisation would become later. Unless im mistaken, HAL has not rolled out a single assembled MKI as yet and u r already talking of full absorption of these complex technologies??? :confused: .

    I donno how its done in other parts of the world but when it comes to tech absorbtion in India, they ususally start with the SKD, move to the CKD and then set up assembly with major components sources from the OEM and increase the level of indigenization over time. WRT MKI the SKD phase one is over (i.e SKD assembled at IAF Base Lohegaon into MKI using russians techs), given that the latest batch of SKD’s went to HAL Ojhar (Nashik) which is where the eventual MKI plant will be set up, this is the start of SKD phase 2 and all CKD will directly go there for assembly. Meanwhile Ojhar will will tooled up and validated for indigenous mfg and assembly. By 2014 all MKI given their ‘deep licence’ agreement will be nearly indigenous (barring those parts that are not cost effecitive at a 140 unit scale)

    To be fair to the PAF and IAF we shouldnt be talking about ‘khayali pulao’ like the Gripen/Eyerie and the 125 M2K untill someone actually signs on the dotted line. Till then its all humbug…reliable sources and all.
    ________
    girlfriend pictures
    ________
    HONDA CB600F

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Pictures #2675485
    George J
    Participant

    Umm i thought that all No.20 jocks are qualified first on the No.24 birds. There are various ways to get to No.24. but there is only one way to get to No.20 and thats via No.24. I donno how No.30 will work.

    Its doesnt matter which seat you occupy on a No.20/30 bird you would have still warm a No.24. seat. Maybe that explains why the No.24 seats are so worn out. 😀 http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/IAF/Images/Special/CopeIndia/USAF01.jpg

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Pictures #2676448
    George J
    Participant

    So anyone know which aircaft the IAF pilots now like best.. the M2K or the MKI?

    I dont think I have come across a pilot who has had the fortune of flying and evaluating the two a/c. There are a lot mig-29 drivers but not sure about M2k.

    But I would say that since the MKI (and the K) are the only ones where you got to pee in a bag or in your pants or hold it in for 10 hours its not a fancy job. Like i said its a whole new ball game with the MKI.

    in reply to: F-15C trounced by Su-30MKI #2677319
    George J
    Participant

    …….The US pilots had 4 F-15C defending an airspace, and the Indians came after them with squadrons of Su-30s, Mig-21s, and Mirages. Was there any actual dogfight situation that happened? Sorry, I don’t remember who posted the story.

    Err nope both sides played both parts. I.E attacker and defender. Both sides got to escort and defend the M2K, Mig-21/27 strike package.

    About the FI story:
    The facts may be right but it was a purely artificial engagement with no AWACS support and only one type of interceptors of the BADZ was used.

    The IAF knows that it didnt really win anything it was purely a ‘goodwill’ exercise, if the USAF gets its F-22 thanks to a ‘poor showing’ then I am sure that the quid pro quo for GOI should be good too. 🙂

    About the Su-30K/MK being flogged, thats the truth. This flogging has some happy and unhappy consequences 😉 . More happy than unhappy so i guess its all good.
    ________
    Mercedes-Benz Ocean Drive specifications
    ________
    Extreme vaporizer review

    in reply to: Can anyone tell me how a HUD works? #2683140
    George J
    Participant

    Total internal reflection. Its not a mirror per se its a glass that allows the image to reflect and yet allows one to see through. Thats what allows the view to either focus on the image being projected or ‘look through’ to whats ahead of them.
    ________
    buy silversurfer vaporizer
    ________
    MARIJUANA SEED

    in reply to: Modern Fighter data processors #2689906
    George J
    Participant

    There may be some valuable data on various DRDO publications so please feel free to post them if anything is found. However, in the case, the only reference is “me”. 😀

    There are bits about the CAC in the Vetrivale article too. The CAC is also called the Open Architecture Computer.

    CAC being a open arch. box is well known info (from circa 2001: Hormuz Mama). But it being a 64 bit open arch box is the gray area. There is a slant ref to it somewhere in the DRDO publications…just can find it.

    Anyway where did YOU learn this info from? If you can share i.e.
    ________
    teen vid
    ________
    N SERIES TRACTORS

    in reply to: Vietnamese Su-30s?? #2690601
    George J
    Participant

    If Tejas is sold with the Kaveri engine, Vietnamese acceptance would be easier. I don’t think Vietnam would accept Tejas with GE F404 engine, as it may make it vulnerable to a US embargo. ………. Even if relations with China turned sour again (quite unlikely at this point with a superhighway being built between Vietnam and Guandong), ………

    The LCA does not need the Kaveri to fly but the IAF needs the Kaveri to make the LCA viable. I dont think even the IAF would accept the Tejas with ‘store bought’ GE-404’s. Everyone in the design, mfg and user establishment knows that. LCA will have the Kaveri…eventually.

    Also I dont think the Vietnamese are going to sour their relation with the US anytime soon. If they wanna be ‘one of the fastest growing economies’ in the area they have to do business with the US…just like China.

    Since this thread is highly speculative, its very difficult to speculate how things will turn out. If the kaveri does well then thats great. If the AL-31FP does well then perhaps a scaled down AL can be developed in liu of the Kaveri, if the Americans are generous then there might be a TOT on the GE-404. Hence its too early to speculate. The RD-93 on the FC-1 is another story I am keenly watching.
    ________
    volcano vaporizer
    ________
    Marijuana strain green crack

    in reply to: Modern Fighter data processors #2690902
    George J
    Participant

    …..
    Coming to the Su-30MKI and LCA where there seems to be a lot of confusion, an original mission computer was fabricated for the later using COTS and eventually found it’s way into the Vetrivale programme. Hosting ARINC 429 and 1533B channels, it could perform 50 million ops per second. However, the LCA will use a new PowerPC/VME-64 based Core Avionics Computer (CAC) developed by ADA, which combines the functions of the mission computer, display processor and video switching units. It has PCI Mezzanine card based MIL-STD-1553B and RS422 master and cursive video graphics modules. The CAC is used on the MiG-27 and Jaguar upgrades as well……

    I need the reference for the CAC, was it in DRDO TechFocus a few months ago?
    ________
    wholesale vaporizers
    ________
    Reliant

    in reply to: Vietnamese Su-30s?? #2690906
    George J
    Participant

    Well I am pretty sure once the Vietnames get a taste of MKV they wouldnt wanna buy anything less than an LCA 😀 . But I am being a bit jingo about it.

    I can see them using FC-1 too…..for target practice. :rolleyes:

    And coz the LCA can also be customize I m pretty sure that a Tejas-V (we have to stop calling it LCA by then) can also be arrange to compliment the MKV.

    Which airforce wouldnt like to streamline logistics and maintainance?

    You never know…..I tell you we live in interesting times.
    ________
    Toyota JZ engine
    ________
    Medical marijuana dispensaries

    in reply to: LCA picture request #2690912
    George J
    Participant

    I cant find the Brochure Pic. Maybe Harry has it.

    These are from BR AI03 page. There are some outdoor displays of the TD-2 with PGMs but no Litening, there are separate pics of litening in the indoor displays.

    NLCA mock up displays:

    http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/IAF/Images/Special/AeroIndia2003/Indoor-LCA-Navy.jpg

    http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/IAF/Images/Special/AeroIndia2003/Indoor-LCA-Twin.jpg
    ________
    drugtest
    ________
    Marijuana vaporizers

    in reply to: New edition of "Su-27- Flanker Story" in July #2690991
    George J
    Participant

    can you ask him the question about the MKK/MKI fuel load discrepancy?

    I would second that but I think there is a lot about the MKK/MKI that is classified and thats the way it should stay.The least that Fomin can do is explicitly state what’s classified rather than attempt to provide info.

    Also since his book is ‘well liked’ by a lot of folks, he should try and get user inputs on their experience with their Su-27/30 variants. Knowing the PLAAF that would be a blackhole (which i guess bodes well for the sematic warriors on this forum and others) but the IAF might give him some inputs if he asks them nicely.

    More info on avionics would be nice. New stuff on the AL-31FP would be nice…

    Basically as much as he can put in post 2000.
    ________
    Toyota Publica history
    ________
    Bmw F800S History

    in reply to: Vietnamese Su-30s?? #2691005
    George J
    Participant

    Off the cuff, somewhere down I wouldnt be too surprised to see. Su-30MKV (MKI customized for Vietnam) with Brahmos-A as the tip of the spear with some LCA’s making the body.

    Wishful thinking…maybe…but you know know.
    ________
    Toyota KZ engine
    ________
    Digital Vaporizers

    in reply to: Su-30MKM #2691886
    George J
    Participant

    Ken:
    Thanks for the info about Fomin. I hope he comes out with another edition of the book. As long as Sukhoi sells Su-27 derivatives this book will always have readers and buyers as long as they maintain accuracy. I wouldnt be too surprised if a bulk of these buyer are users themselves. 😉

    One of the problems that Fomin will face will be how much is ‘too much’ info about the MKK and MKI programs. Both dont seem to want reveal much. In fact one of the important factoid that we have debated to death on this forum and others is rumoured to be wrong by a ‘couple of tons’ about one of the aircrafts. But since its not ‘open source’ it cant be used for any discussion. Sort of frustrating but then again while this is merely a hobby for most of us…others live and die by it.

    So i guess there is only so much that Fomin can even talk about.
    ________
    buy vapormatic
    ________
    Xt600

Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 434 total)