dark light
Airliner World
Combat Aircraft
AeroPlane
Flypast
Airforces
Aviation
Pcpilot
Air

dreadnought

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 79 total)
1 2 3 4 5 6
  • Author
    Posts
  • April 1, 2005 at 11:00 am in reply to: New Solo Display F-16 for the KLu #2625680
    dreadnought
    Participant

    they run outa money in teh half of repainting??

    front is nice blue angel like, back is like a tiger force custom paintjob meeting

    dutch art or complete crewup?

    March 19, 2005 at 9:16 pm in reply to: Caqn the mothballing of Flyvapnet Gripen A-Bs kill the Gripen Program? #2632099
    dreadnought
    Participant

    The Gripen program isn’t doing all that bad.Hungary,South Africa and the Czech Rep. have all selected the Gripen.Thailand I heard were going to order it to replace their F-5s.Bulgaria,Switzerland and Slovakia are also interested in the Gripen to replace their Mig-29s and F/A-18s.Informal discussions have also been held with India and Pakistan.
    While it may noy be in serve with many countries yet,it does appear to be going better then the Eurofighter 2000 and Rafale programs as far as exports.

    switzerland is not going to replace any brnd new F18’s with gripens, they are then meant to replace the F5 fleet, as switserland onlt has 32 f18’s , where do you get such a crazy idea?

    March 17, 2005 at 7:01 pm in reply to: Do you think Brazil should have a nuclear submarine? #2057396
    dreadnought
    Participant

    brazil better equip it’s airforce with a new fighter instead of a useless ssn

    March 15, 2005 at 9:12 pm in reply to: USS America goes down next month… #2057527
    dreadnought
    Participant

    I don’t think a name is such a big deal, it’s a ship sunk under the purpose of tests. (Personally i value the name enterprise alot more 😉 )

    as for the america’s choice, it’s the only carrier resembling modern carriers, a forrestal is outdated design

    anything is better then the scrapyard, i hope we get to see the go down on tv

    March 13, 2005 at 5:11 pm in reply to: Eurofighter and Rafale comparision Question #2634360
    dreadnought
    Participant

    Hi all

    Many people says the Eurofighter and Rafale is comparable in performance, effectiveness and stuff. But if you see that evaluation performed by the Britain’s DERA (Defense Evaluation and Research Agency) used to evaluate the Eurofighter’s and others fighters’ BVR capabilities against an Su-35 plane, the results of 82% for the EF2000 and 50% for the Rafale is a big diference between them. I mean, 32% is a lot of gap in effectiveness between these two planes! Where is the “comparable in performance”?

    If anyone is interested in reading the article, here’s the link:
    http://www.eurofighter.starstreak.net/Eurofighter/tech.html

    Comments will be appreciated.

    Thanks

    you do need to read anything comming out of britain with a grain of salt, off course europfighter will do alot better in any! british test, it’s called marketing your own products with a wink to foreign sales and securing own funds for aquiring the jet.

    March 9, 2005 at 8:17 pm in reply to: British CVF thread #2058263
    dreadnought
    Participant

    first i wanna see it build…….

    March 6, 2005 at 10:08 am in reply to: USS America goes down next month… #2058480
    dreadnought
    Participant

    From Distiller’s link:

    Wow, two carriers will be suck this year. In that case, good time for scuba divers!

    in 6000 feet of water??

    you must be a superhuman 😀

    March 5, 2005 at 7:00 pm in reply to: F-15K 1st Flight #2637823
    dreadnought
    Participant

    It’s quite funny to see how Boeing’s marketing people can label a 33 year old fighter as their “newest fighter”. 😀

    regards,
    Castor

    because it still kicks everything up in the air to the moon if it get’s in his way? even after 33 years

    February 25, 2005 at 7:22 pm in reply to: Rafale on Foch #2059596
    dreadnought
    Participant

    you’ll have to take into account the limitations of foch’s catapults
    a rafale would be severely limited in warload, only air to air armament would really be practical

    February 24, 2005 at 4:45 pm in reply to: American navy V european (joint) navy #2059811
    dreadnought
    Participant

    yes European ships will be very close to the bottom of the ocean……….Either against it or under way to it

    February 20, 2005 at 7:51 pm in reply to: What is this a torpedo calculator? #2060170
    dreadnought
    Participant

    a simple stopwatch, like in the old days you launched a torpedo and you knew how long it would take for the torpedo to impact, so you follow on the stopwatch, if you didn’t here a bang anter the calculated time, you well missed 😀

    January 28, 2005 at 5:59 pm in reply to: Submarine run aground #2061517
    dreadnought
    Participant

    looks like a small miracle that the sub didn’t sink

    strong sub

    January 20, 2005 at 8:26 pm in reply to: Three submarines damaged by earthquake #2062213
    dreadnought
    Participant

    Would the subs have detected the killer wave?

    ever seen “the hunt for red october”???

    sisemic activity makes sounds

    January 16, 2005 at 11:20 pm in reply to: Will Manned Aircraft Ever Become Outmoded? #2612550
    dreadnought
    Participant

    it would be the biggest mistake makable, but mistakes are there to be made and hopefully learned from.

    January 11, 2005 at 9:38 pm in reply to: Your Favorite Warship? #2063066
    dreadnought
    Participant

    USS ENTERPRISE

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 79 total)
1 2 3 4 5 6