dark light

Wallace

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 99 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Shutter or Aperture ? #443469
    Wallace
    Participant

    There is a kind of a general rule of thumb that says use Aperture control for static shots and shutter control for moving but you really need to use what works best for you. I’m shooting a lot more in manual these days than anything else mainly at f/8, f/5.6 or f/4 depending on which lens I am using and how much depth of field I want from it.

    in reply to: Strathallan Aircraft Collection – latter days #989829
    Wallace
    Participant

    Last week, I had the good fortune and a rude reintroduction to the condition of “our” beloved old Lanc.
    http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3727/12247800854_6ee12ca77d_o.jpg
    G-BCOH Lancaster, Doncaster by wwshack, on Flickr

    The South Yorks Aircraft Museum has the rear fuselage of G-BCOH and I would also guess one of the bomb-bay doors is also there.

    I wept when I heard the news, I was sad when I saw this but also glad that something remains of the old girl and much of my Sundays in the late 70s and early 80s.

    in reply to: Interesting video regarding old instruments #997535
    Wallace
    Participant

    Interesting not wishing to pick holes in it but I wonder why the health physics team were not wearing face masks and yet the people they were scanning were wearing face masks?
    The guy that was changing the filter in the airborne sampler, where there would be a high concentration of particles was not wearing any protective equipment either.

    It does make you wonder about sites such as DM and Kingman where huge numbers of aircraft were broken up on site. Nearer home and a few miles down the road is Dalgety Bay, the beach there is contaminated with radiation from gauges dumped from the HMS Donibristle.

    in reply to: Museums and Tripods ….. #1038630
    Wallace
    Participant

    East Forture had a strange policy regarding tripods. If you wanted to use one then you MUST therefore be a commercial photographer and the museum (right or wrong) claimed copyright on your photos. To use a tripod you had to apply for a photography permit.
    I had no problem the last time that I was there using a tripod, so maybe they have mellowed a bit.
    I shot a lot of HDR and no one challenged me
    http://farm7.staticflickr.com/6114/6367857775_e9471494a1_z.jpg
    RD220 Beaufighter RAAF, East Fortune by wwshack, on Flickr

    in reply to: More images found of 1970s scrap in Quarrywood, Elgin… #1075154
    Wallace
    Participant

    I am glad that you guys have found the pictures on my web site because I had forgotten about them!

    I was sure that the mystery fuselage from Forres was a Buc, the same midnight blue colour scheme, however I will stand corrected.

    Quarrywood was some place that’s for sure, we’ll never see its like again.

    Just for the record, I’m quoting out of Wrecks and Relics 8th edition
    “Forres… the situation at the D & S metals scrapyard in Gordon Street has hardly changed….noted in 1981 were large pieces of Buccaneer S.1 XN973 (ex Lossie Dump) and a pair of Gannet wings.”

    And yes it does look very much like an 8 instead of a 9.

    in reply to: Color correction #444823
    Wallace
    Participant

    White balance – your camera needed to see some white to determine the correct temperature correction.

    The Red is over saturated. Something to bear in mind is that the Unsharp mask method of sharpening actually makes this saturation worse. There are alternative methods to sharpening a picture such as Lab mode/High Pass Filtering.

    in reply to: Camera users (DSLR) #445499
    Wallace
    Participant

    Great idea, I hope it works for you.

    If you are going straight to print then you could probably get away with in-camera sharpening. Images for printing needs more sharpening than images for the web, so shooting in JPEG may work.

    If it is a disaster then you will have had the opportunity to learn from your mistakes and go on to better things from there.

    in reply to: NEAM Night Photo Shoot 25th Nov #461679
    Wallace
    Participant

    There is no mention of the February night shoot on the NEAM web site, is this event still going ahead?

    in reply to: NEAM Night Photo Shoot 25th Nov #465420
    Wallace
    Participant

    Is it necessary to book for this event or can one just turn up on the night?

    in reply to: Dirty Soft. #447250
    Wallace
    Participant

    Soft, Un-sharpened, Blurry they all mean the same in their books. The cockpit looks to be out of focus, there is another word, but I can’t be sure because the the image size.
    I noticed the white mark, it may even be another aircraft in the blue sky.

    BA aircraft are notorious to get right, the British Airways titles either show up as not sharp or over sharpened.

    This is an idiots guide to a.net rejections – http://planecatcher.com/IGRR.htm I will desist from saying who is the idiot. Just remember that an a.net rejection does not mean that you are a bad photographer, just that you don’t meet their standards.

    in reply to: 3 From Cumbernauld #466966
    Wallace
    Participant

    Best helicopter flight I ever had was in a R22.

    The R22 is reputed to be the largest production helicopter in the world. The 4,000th one was delivered late 2007.

    in reply to: Solway Aviation Museum #487514
    Wallace
    Participant

    http://i26.photobucket.com/albums/c110/WShackleton/XV406_Carlisle_20090329_040.jpg

    in reply to: Solway Aviation Museum #487716
    Wallace
    Participant

    I used a Hoya R71 filter, which filters the light up to the IR part of the spectrum hence near Infra Red.

    Organic material reflects IR light and appears white, non organic material absorbs the light and appears dark. Water is black.
    It produces great monochromes.

    Wallace
    Participant

    Infra red is not quite finished.

    This will answer another question about which site that I post to….
    http://www.airplane-pictures.net/image16248.html
    http://www.airplane-pictures.net/image16217.html
    http://www.airplane-pictures.net/image4536.html

    or the whole collection
    http://www.airplane-pictures.net/search.php?p=infra+red&Submit=Search

    These are near Infra Red images using the Hoya R71 filter. I love the monochromes that they produce. I would not be able to post pictures like those on any other on-line photo database.

    I was thinking the other day of how much I preferred developing a 10×8 print compared to coaxing an inferior toned print out of an inkjet printer.

    Wallace
    Participant

    One of the things that bothers me about modern day aircraft photography is the close cropped and centered mentality that pervades the on-line aviation photo databases. It seems to me that Composition is now a dirty word and anything off centre or even showing more than a few pixels between the aircraft and the frame is a waste of space.
    (I have been lucky in finding somewhere to post my photos that encourages photographers to Think Different, rather than the run of the mill stuff that one usually sees.)

    Photographers are no longer thinking as photographers should do, they merely record the fact that one has seen such and such a plane and that’s it.

    With some of the blue sky type photographs it boils down to no more than a “Boeing sandwich.” Two slice of sky with an aircraft filling.

    There have been some nice nostalgic photos here, I only wish that I could find my old stuff and post a few memories myself.

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 99 total)