The introduction of ASV21 occurred much earlier and was not a part of Phase III. It was introduced at late Phase1/11 approximately 1959 onwards. Phase III meant a complete airframe rebuild plus the changes included new nav and compass system, an additional position in the tactical compartment (2nd Sonics) The ability to carry the American nuclear DC plus a host of other minor avionics changes. (all the switches became grey and not black) And most importantly improved soundproofing, oh, and a nice creamy decor inside. Still b****y noisy though!
The Viper fit was a separate “upgrade” which eventually got rolled into the Phase III modifications, this is why it is often believed, incorrectly, to be part of the Phase III. These changes also meant that the engine generators had to be enlarged to provide the electrical power, this in turn meant uprated gearboxes etc, this configuration gave the Griffon its MK58 designation. Incidentally, Gatwick Aviation Museum have the last MKIII to undergo Phase III conversion, WR974, this was completed in March 1970.
Just a quick “off the top of my head” PTR175 fitted to Hunter T7-T8, Lightning, Nimrod (2).
Ben,
no offence taken, apologies if the reply was a little terse.
I was simply stating the facts. We would have loved to have received any of those airframes, however they are a commercial organisation after all. Plus with the problmes we have with the local council it may have made the situation more difficult.
I can also confirm that the “Jaguar” we have XX734 came from Aerospace Logistics. We were offered XX121 about 18 month ago, that offer has now been withdrawn. I have no idea why, again I assume that the company has decided to get more money for it. The Faygate yard does indeed belong them.
Peter Mills
The answer is simple, they are not linked to Gatwick Aviation Museum.
Most of the “Harrier Wrecks” are actually owned by a spares recovery company which just happens to be located in Charlwood.
The museum only has one airframe XV751 which is on display.
Peter Mills
Joe,
the Vipers are not installed.
We do have them, in fact one is being restored by RR Heritage trust.
RRHT take 5 years to do one Viper. We aren’t complaining ,the job they do is, as you might expect, superb.
We do have a long term plan to restore and fit them, but really is long term.
One consideration is to run the fuel from the tip tanks only. This would allow us to run the Vipers on JetA1, AVTUR etc instead of the original AVGAS. This would prolong the life of the Vipers, probably for as long as the airframe exists.
Peter Mills
Peter,
It’s not the lack of air that causes the overheating, it’s the lack of coolant flow through the rads, they dried out whilst at Cosford and now a combination of internal corrosion and crystallized glycol restricts the flow. We did give a couple to a local vintage rad repairer, that resulted in one blown rad on the first run.
Peter Mills
Beware !
I recently obtained an AP from Hendon, no problems, reasonable cost and timing was slow but OK. When I asked about another manual it turned out that what they thought they had was only the cover and separators but no content! They had no idea what had happened and that was the only “copy” they had. It was an AP for a radar so I asked Cosford if they had it, they get theirs from Hendon!
This is just a warning to say just because it’s listed it may not be any use.
By the way anyone know where I can get a copy of AP2890G (ASV21)?
Vipers and Shackletons
It’s correct to say that the Viper 203s on the Shackleton ran on AVGAS (115/145), equally true that the fuel supply came from the main tanks as the Griffons.
Initially, there were only two throttle setting, idle and full. The engine was limited to a total of 30 hours run time at full, with a maximun run of two minutes at a time.
The Flight engineer had complete control of the engine including the throttles. The pilots only indication was a second set of rpm gauges fitted to the centre console. A set of four gauges on the side by the Flt Eng recorded run times, both full and idle.
Later modifications introduced an “inching” mechanism to allow almost any rpm to be set. The thrust from the Viper was roughly equivalent to the output of the Griffon at full throttle. It was said that there was no need for fuel jettison on Viper fitted Shacks, just wind up the Vipers and watch the fuel gauges rapidly descend towards empty!
On board you could tell when the Vipers were fired up, the aircraft flew level, the normal slight nose up attitude disapeared!
See the link for information about the original install
http://users.bigpond.net.au/Shackleton/viper.html
Peter Mills
Chris Ashworths book (THE definitive book on Shackletons!) does have a whole appendix on the Nomad.
This link is basically
http://users.bigpond.net.au/Shackleton/nomad.html
a shortened version of the text.
There are also three accompanying photos showing the engine installation + the wing radiators.
Additionally there is some interesting info on this link (from the same site, thanks to Mo Botwood).
http://users.bigpond.net.au/Shackleton/mark4.html
Peter Mills
Herald
In the past this airframe has been offered to Gatwick Aviation Museum.
It is now in a fire training area and has been for a couple of years.
Our understanding is that it is still on charge with the Fire and Rescue services at the airport. Until it is “written off” it cannot be disposed of.
Every few months the museum queries the status of the Herald and is given the same reply.
It is now deteriorating quite steadily, if it’s not moved or some preventive action taken soon it will more difficult to recover it.
Its demise is not imminent, but action soon would help to ensure that it’s still around in the next few years.
Shackleton Periscopes
There was more than one place to use the periscope on the Shack.
Mostly used to observe the bomb bay, one point is in the floor between the Flt Eng and the WOP. There is another at the rear of the bomb bay in the galley floor. The periscope itself is stored opposite the entrance door.
I too am a little concerned that the Shack may “lose it’s wings”. Looking at the photographs there appears to be a cordless drill on the wing. It may be coincidence, but it’s next to the access panel for the outer wing bolts. The only other items below that panel are the taxy and landing lamps. Maybe the intention is to refurb the wings off the frame. That’s OK, as long as they go back on.
Props turned by wind… Funny!
Someones pulling your Plo***r! If you had any idea how much wind force would be required to turn the engines over from the props you’d be a little more skeptical. Of course it is possible, not sure how much more would have blown off the rest of the airframe by then. At GAM we lost the DA behind No.3 a few years ago in “hurricane force” winds, but oddly enough the prop blades didn’t move. Hand rotating the engine does it no harm ( either direction). In fact it’s part of our pre-start checks. Turning constantly for a prolonged period would not do the engine any good mind you.
This is a historic aircraft, representing the only part of the RAF’s Cold War participation that was active and hot (as opposed to deterrence).
I think you’ll find that remark somewhat at odds with the day to day operations carried out by the RAF’s Maritime squadrons. They were probably “in contact” with more soviet units daily than any other part of the RAF!
Peter Mills
The lens were fitted in place of the AI23 radar in the “bullet”.
If my memory is correct the bullet also had ballast in to ensure that the correct weight was in the nose. The AI alone weighed 225lbs.
The F1A’s were a lot faster than the squadron F3/F6 models.
TFF pilots would have great fun at the end of the day slowing opening their throttles as a squadron F3/F6 approached and then out running them!
It was a common occurrance to hear over the radio a frustrated F3/F6 pilot
cursing the TFF pilot.