dark light

Peter Mills

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 188 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Charlwood #1363135
    Peter Mills
    Participant

    Yes, the Sea Vixen is still a runner! Small, incremetal amounts of work have been carried out on her over the past couple of years. We really need fuel for her now to continue to keep those Avon 208s blasting away though. We intend to run the Vixen a few times this year (Assuming the fuel situation can be resolved).

    in reply to: Charlwood #1364653
    Peter Mills
    Participant

    On behalf of the “small team” at GAM I wish to thank all of those who have made such kind, positive remarks. Not all outside exhibit museums are doomed to see their exhibits rot quickly away, unlike some of the doom merchants who post here regularly seem to foretell. It is true that of course that they can only truly be preserved under cover. However, until then we will endeavor to hold the line ready for the day when they come inside. Yes, the Lightning is making steady, progress. Although anyone watching the attempts fit the “puzzle piece” that was the starboard flap on Saturday may have doubted it!

    in reply to: Hawkinge Museum #1342231
    Peter Mills
    Participant

    At the risk of appearing to be a clone of Seaking93! Exactly the same arrangement would be used by us. In fact we had a major article in FP a few months ago. Again coming to some arrangement for either a donation or a fee has been no problem with sensible, enthusiastic photographers and if they are really commercially aware understand that such arrangements benefit both parties.

    PDS, does this present you with a problem?

    in reply to: Hawkinge Museum #1343739
    Peter Mills
    Participant

    At Gatwick Aviation Museum we have the same policy as at FAAM Yeovilton and Cobham Hall (as expressed by Seaking93). This has recently changed from no restrictions after we discovered someone making money from pictures without even acknowledging the source!. As a private, non-public funded organisation, we have no problem with people taking photos for private use but when someone makes money from the photos of our exhibits and we receive nothing that is clearly wrong.

    in reply to: The best Saturday morning for some time…… #1371584
    Peter Mills
    Participant

    TMN,

    Very glad to hear that you enjoyed your visit. As you can see we are actively working on the aircraft to bring more into running condition as well as improving their general well being. The gentleman who showed you around would have been Ted. The Lightning is not ready for engines yet, it will be some before the prospect of runs are close. We are currently estimating about 18 months. Watch out for a major new update to the Lightning web pages in the very near future! Written by the engineers working on ZF579.

    in reply to: Death of Pelican 16 #1390503
    Peter Mills
    Participant

    Chris Ashworths book is generally considered by Shack men as the authoritive work on this aircraft. It is out of print and can be difficult to find. Chris Ashworth was, I believe, a Nav on Shacks and only recently passed away. Barry Jones book is good but has a few minor factual errors.
    Sadly, in its day the Shack carried out it role quietly in the background whilst more “glamorous” aircraft tended to feature in the publics imagination. As a result little was written about the Shack at the time and therefore there is now a dearth of material. One word of caution do not insult the Shack, only ex Shack men have that right !!!!

    in reply to: Museums – money crisis? #1427735
    Peter Mills
    Participant

    David,

    In my experience when showing youngsters of the “playstation generation” around our aircraft they are somewhat awed. It is suddenly very different when you can see the size of even a relatively small airframe and touch hard, cold metal. Eyes are opened and most can clearly see that there is little or no relation to the computer generated kind. I can only hope that this impression lasts, because if we can capture just a few of these “hearts and minds” then we are setting up a chance of ensuring the future for many of these aircraft. I certainly see repeat visits and from many a real interest in the aircraft. So perhaps we should not dismiss the younger generations so lightly.

    in reply to: Buccaneer Pics #1355797
    Peter Mills
    Participant

    XN923 during her repaint last year.

    in reply to: Dove Celebration #1416729
    Peter Mills
    Participant

    VP967 at Redhill is very close to being ready to ground run.

    This airframe has had many man hours work on it and externally has been completely restored. Work on the interior is on-going. This Dove is owned by Kevin and Daniel Hunt and they have spent much time and money on this restoration.

    in reply to: Cypriot Shackletons #1352874
    Peter Mills
    Participant

    It a heater for keeping the crew warm on cold winter nights.
    It was the final attempt to keep the temperature inside warm for those crew who were not Naviagtors, who somehow always got the warmth!

    in reply to: Preserved Harrier pictures #1353292
    Peter Mills
    Participant

    I can confirm that Harrrier two seater in RN colours XW268 is still in a yard in a corner of Sussex. (Saw it a couple of weeks agao) It not a scrap yard however and is owned by a company that “spares recovers” Harrrier, Jaguar and other ex Military jets. It is just about recoverable though if much more of it disapears or she is not moved soon (i.e in the next six months) it will be too late.

    in reply to: Vulcan XL391 at Blackpool #1358939
    Peter Mills
    Participant

    This has been inevitable for some while, back in May there were attempts to move this airframe on. A number of organisations were approached. The cost of moving such a large airframe is far in excess of any purchase costs. That assumes that the airframe doesn’t just fall apart when touched. Which seems quite likely given what Duncan just reported. Its a shame that it was left so long, there is only one proper conclusion and that is sadly the scrapman.

    in reply to: Pembroke survivors #1378979
    Peter Mills
    Participant

    At Gatwick Aviation Museum we have three Percival Prince type derivatives.
    One Pembroke and two Sea Prince T1’s. One of the Sea Princes has just been restored to a taxiable condition. In fact a couple of weeks ago it was trundled down our short grass strip and managed to get back! Pictures of this event will soon be added to the web site. There are a couple of pictures of the interior of this aircraft taken a week or so before the taxi. We will soon begin a in-depth survey of the the Pembroke with a view to repeating the work carried out on the Prince, the objective being to put her into a taxiable state next year. There is a Pembroke in the US which is due to fly very soon, maybe this month.

    in reply to: Whose Heritage? What Takes Priority? SCRAP Sally B today #1558302
    Peter Mills
    Participant

    Phillip,

    well said! This subject has been aired on a regular basis. Once again I notice that the US contigent is most vocal in their dissent. I believe that you had no intention of insulting the americans, but they sure can be touchy!
    IWM is constantly complaining about lack of funds, yet receives what for some, are vast amounts. As is often the case it comes down to priorities and the management decisions that decide these. It’s quite clear that the IWM is firstly a commercially orientated organisation and therefore the decisions it makes are duly influenced this way. Until we get a change of emphasis/management this will always be the case. Poll the “forum members” to ask if they would rather money be spent on getting either a Spitfire or Shackleton into an airworthy state and I would bet the Shack would come a poor second. Some would even deny that a Shackleton is a warbird! It needs more people to raise their heads above the parapet, do not be bowed under by the flack coming from the P51/Spit lobby.

    in reply to: Some thing different for the jet boys.TSR2 #1810073
    Peter Mills
    Participant

    Some “small” parts of the TSR2 are preserved, here at Gatwick Aviation Museum we have TWO Olympus 32001 engines for the TSR2. I spent a short while at RRE in the late sixties and was told by the development engineers that most of the avionics systems had only reached design stage, only about 20% had even reached pre-production before it was stopped.

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 188 total)