dark light

Peter Mills

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 188 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Peter Mills
    Participant

    Sadly, we will not be running the Shackleton.
    Two reasons really, one is we simply don’t have enough time/manpower to prep her and secondly the fuel cost is between £600 and £800 for AVGAS.

    For the past three months or more, all of our main engineering effort has been with the Sea Vixen, (we’ve fixed a number of hydraulic problems + HT issues) and a little on the Prince. We have to modify the stbd side fuel system on the Prince to make it an electrical system. This should be completed in the next couple of weeks, we have all of the parts now.

    We’re also trying to get the STAD to run beyond idle, it’s resisting all efforts at the moment. It’s often the subsidiary items that take disproportionate amounts of time. Many man hours without any progress feels like time wasted when there is so much to do!

    in reply to: Shackleton fuel? #1212167
    Peter Mills
    Participant

    It’s a common misconception that the Viper fit on the MKIII Shack was originally a part of Phase III update. In fact it was a separate initiative that was later rolled into the Phase III fit. The earliest Phase III aircraft had to be returned to AVRO to have the Vipers retro-fitted.

    The fuel was indeed AVGAS with a limited time allowed at full throttle. There are four gauges in the stbd side just above the Flt Eng that record total run time and take-off run time. The maximum allowable run time was 30 hours, after that they were removed and sent to the engine bay to be refurbed. The AVGAS burnt the compressor blades.

    Although the original fit only allowed for idle or full throttle, later mods introduced an “inching” control to allow the throttle to be moved to almost any setting. All controlled of course by the Flt Eng, no throttles for the “drivers”.

    in reply to: Torrey Canyon Disaster Footage #1227391
    Peter Mills
    Participant

    The Hunters were using napalm loaded into drop tanks to try to ignite the oil spillage. Many Hunters were sent to St. Mawgan for a few days while this operation took place. There was the fascinating sight of a group of plumbers (sorry armourers!) mixing the concoction in 45 gallon barrels with big wooden stirrers!

    in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1174758
    Peter Mills
    Participant

    There is another side to raising this amount of money for a single project. How much money has it siphoned off of the general funds that would be spent by people on other museums? In this current financial state, the amount of cash that is likely to be spent on historic aviation related activities is almost certainly a lot less than other years. You can only go so many times to the well. With this much money going to the Vulcan I can see that it will, inevitably make it more difficult for other organisations to raise the money they need to keep going

    Whilst as an ex Vulcan engineer I applaud the work done and the achievement to get her flying again, I have always been uneasy about the amount of money going to this single project. My feeling is that for the relatively few people who will get to see her the money may be better used if spread around the general aviation community. The overheads alone of keeping this one aircraft flying would keep many museums/collections going for years. I have given money to this project, mostly because I, like many, have a sentimental affection for the Vulcan. Now, when I use my head I can clearly see that I may not have spent my money in the most cost effective way. Having looked at the accounts (such as they are) I will not be giving/pledging any more to this project. There are many deserving organisations in this country to whom a small fraction of what has been spent on the Vulcan would be wisely used and would make a big difference to them.

    I wish them good luck, I hope that the people who have given so generously will be rewarded by the aircraft fulfilling all of its engagements this year. If that doesn’t happen the current mild disillusionment that I know exists may turn to something else.

    in reply to: Hawker Seahawk #1177680
    Peter Mills
    Participant

    I used the one in your flypast profile.

    Can I suggest that you send me a PM with your email address? That’s probably the best way to sort it.

    Cheers

    Peter

    in reply to: Hawker Seahawk #1178145
    Peter Mills
    Participant

    Hi sagindragin,

    Have you received the email(s) I sent you about the pictures?

    I will leave them available until the end of the week, they’ll be removed on Sunday. If you’ve got them already would appreciate an email.

    Thanks

    in reply to: Hawker Seahawk #1183797
    Peter Mills
    Participant

    Our Sea Hawk has been paint stripped and is currently down to the base metal finish. In this state all of the rivets etc are very clear. Which part of the port fuse do you want a picture of? I can get you what you need in a couple of days.

    in reply to: Shackletons-I knew we'd get back onto them again! #1193765
    Peter Mills
    Participant

    Makes a refreshing change from the constant, relentless Spitfire postings!!!!;)

    in reply to: Shackleton serial? #1193792
    Peter Mills
    Participant

    Whilst Blue Silk was a development of Green satin there was no physical commonality, the T/R, Tracker units, aerial and indicators were all different.

    One LRU could have been fitted to almost any aircraft, over the life of the airframe/equipment it would be most unusual for any unit to remain in the aircraft it was originally fitted to. Line Replaceable Units were not assigned to individual aircraft serials, they often acquired a label or sticker when removed temporarily from an aircraft undergoing major servicing etc.

    in reply to: Shackleton serial? #1196439
    Peter Mills
    Participant

    Aerial is quite correct, Green Satin was never fitted on Shacks, the only outside possibility is WR972 used for trials throughout its life. Blue Silk was the standard fit, it was a development of Green Satin and was designed to improve on Green Satins performance over water. All marks of Shack used Blue Silk.

    in reply to: Shackletons-I knew we'd get back onto them again! #1204464
    Peter Mills
    Participant

    Officially the guns where fired by the siggies, some of who still retained their AG badge from earlier days! In reality most of the crew would take the opportunity to bang away. Didn’t please the pilots much though, used to fill the cockpit with cordite smoke!

    Mo Botwood has very little to do with the Shack Assoc now. After he started it he basically handed it over the the current management a couple of years ago. You really should contact them, they would be very pleased to receive any photos that you might offer. The editor of the “Growler” lives very close by and is always looking for new pictures or stories, so I know anything you offered would be gratefully received.

    in reply to: Gatwick Fairey Gannet AEW.3 #1228892
    Peter Mills
    Participant

    Wyvernfan, sorry for the delay in replying.

    Yes, I believe that our S.1. is the only one capable of running, and yes they are Gyron Juniors.
    The port engine has a large crack in the compressor casing so it doesn’t get lit often! The starbd engine has quite a lot of vibration, although that was fitted by us a few years ago. The original was seized solid. We do have another spare in the engine shed, but I think that may have a few bits missing.

    As for taxying, well very unlikely, the nose wheel needs replacing now. We have been promised a new one but haven’t seen it yet. I wouldn’t put it beyond the bounds of possibility, but!!!!

    in reply to: Gatwick Fairey Gannet AEW.3 #1229881
    Peter Mills
    Participant

    Sadly the Gannet is not runnable, it’s had no real done work on it for many years. It has never been run since it arrived, as far as I’m aware. It needs a lot of work, one prop blade from the rear set (I think!) has the tip broken off. We do have a spare Double Mamba in the engine shed, not sure what condition it’s in, probably better than the installed one, at least it’s been inside for many years.

    You can add Sea Prince T1 to the list of runners, although due to lack of fuel it’s not run for a couple of years. Mind you, it’s only a tractor engine so will run on almost anything! Currently the starboard fuel c0ck operation is being reworked, the original Teleflex having jammed again! It’s being modified to an electrical system, the same mod we did on the port side a couple of years ago.

    We hope to be adding to our runners list this year, the Hunter T7A is close to being ready for engine fitment.

    in reply to: History of IT in Aviation #1230640
    Peter Mills
    Participant

    One of the first digital computers used in an airborne system was probably the Elliot 920B (8k core memory) at the heart of the mission system in the Nimrod MR1. This was in service in 1969, the operating program (not an OS!) was loaded using a very heavy box that read the mylar tape instructions. A later innovation was a program written to compute the figures derived from compasss swings, the Navs loved that one!

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton to fly again.. In The U.K!! #1178712
    Peter Mills
    Participant

    Shackleton Mk2c

    Postfade,
    nice pictures, but what classifies a Shackleton as a MK2c?
    I have worked on all marks and have some definitive information and nowhere can I find, nor can I remember a 2c.
    It may just be fading memory of course!

    Peter

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 188 total)