dark light

Al.

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 956 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Al.
    Participant

    A.I. Stands for Artificial Intelligence, is that right?

    Possibly, but Al (aye elle) is simply a shortened version of my name!

    You ain’t the first forumite to make that mistake and I doubt you’ll be the last.

    Al.
    Participant

    Climate Instability
    Climate Instability
    Its Climate Instability
    Climate Instability is the scientific term
    Global Warming is a straw man argument put forward by those who don’t believe (or have commercial interests in ignoring) in Climate Instability

    Clearly there is nothing wrong in taking a contrary view

    And pointing out that there is not a provable linear relationship between X and Y is laudable. But scientists have not made that claim (some well-meaning simplifiers have)

    But just as I would be ill-mannered, disingenuous and oafish in labelling such a person stating a contrary view as a climate-change-denier arguing against a claim which hasn’t actually been made is a bit off

    in reply to: Frankenplane Prototypes #2222877
    Al.
    Participant

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]235299[/ATTACH]

    Almost looks real.

    I’d say more than that; it looks like that’s what JSF was meant to be all along

    in reply to: LRS-B #2232404
    Al.
    Participant

    I think that subsonic is most likely

    The incredibly high-speed uninterceptable nuke delivery role has already been taken by SSBNs and ICBMs

    What (IMMOO) USAF want is a longer ranged, longer loiter, simpler, cheaper, lower maintenance B2

    Sometimes the technological improvements allow us to address the non-sexy bits. Availability being the big one for B2 (kinda like the SHornet; yes it could do with longer range, yes the solution to stores seperation is an offence in the eyes of the god of engineering, yes it does not look as sexy as the F14 but it gives the USN what they need)

    in reply to: Breguet 941S STOL transport info #2232733
    Al.
    Participant

    On the other hand, I did not even know this design existed. So many thanks for opening my eyes.

    in reply to: Little bit of fun if your up for it. #2025048
    Al.
    Participant

    Ok chaps can you help me out here how much of the ship do get for the money say 225 million

    Depends on the threat level, I might be inclined to go the FFBNW route.

    in reply to: Dassault Rafale, News & Discussion (XV) #2233267
    Al.
    Participant

    I have never seen anything to suggest that our Indian chums are idiots so the suggestion that this post-contract-awarding stubbornness is purely to allow the Raf* deal to die is the only analysis which makes sense to me.

    India missed the boat to but the M2k production line which would have suited them down to the ground, they found themselves committed to a fiscally open-ended competition, and cannot maintain face by withdrawing so pursue a (non) negotiating strategy which will lead to the contract dying.

    *I used to hate that contraction (mainly due to the possible confusion which UK armed forces “The Indian government is trying to buy the Royal Air Force, goodness me they are ambitious!” but the spelling pitfalls of confusing French warplane and Israeli company mean that it now makes sense to me)

    in reply to: Frankenplane Prototypes #2233924
    Al.
    Participant

    It’s not OT. The thread is all about creative expressions.

    Discorde is like the ‘attainable xb-70’ on a budget. The XB-70 was never truly affordable.

    Absoblutely. Genuine OT posts are people flogging their personal dead horse* where it has no place to be or being thread fascists to boost their own self worth

    That was a genuinely interesting post submitted to appeal to likeminded aersospace geeks

    * like I’m doing here I spose!

    in reply to: Frankenplane Prototypes #2234186
    Al.
    Participant

    Wasn’t there plans to install a Spey in the Mirage III? I can’t recall if it was considered for the RAF or a foreign customer, but I would have liked to seen that!

    Also, did anyone ever consider the Concorde as a bomber? Kinda like an Anglo-Gaelic version of the Tu-22, Tu-160 or B-1B. Would have made an excellent long range, high speed launch platform for cruise missiles and other stand off weapons I think.

    Mirage IV with Speys and TSR2 avionics I thought, possibly for both RAF and ADA

    We messed the Normans about on that one and so probably sewed the seeds for future Gallic intrangence (no one to blame but ourselves)

    I had never thought of giving the Discorde Speys in place of Olympus, but as with many aviation fans had dreams that we would militarise the Concorde

    in reply to: Little bit of fun if your up for it. #2025157
    Al.
    Participant

    Hmmm…

    First thought is that they are already armed to the teeth!

    A second hand ro-ro would suit the marines and their needs nicely as there is no need for amphibious capability, Wouldn’t cost a bomb.

    Not exactly lacking in fisheries protection and whatnot, though the frigates are long in the tooth. Look to replace through the second hand market, Consider Type 26 if nothing stands out though preference for something heavy hulled.

    Those F18s must cost a fortune in maintenance so have a word with Saab about leasing Gripen Cs. Similar with the P3s, very heavy shipping traffic so focus on SAR rather than ASW and consider replacing with US2s. Look through diplomatic channels to join the 5 powers and consider a seaplane tender / oiler such that airforce and navy could participate in exercises and disaster relief. Nothing too grand, smallish converted merchant vessel would suffice.

    The oil field is rather a long distance away. Purchase a few extended AW609s, get rid / lease to Russian oligarch the presidential jet and charge the oil firms for rotating personel on the rigs. If someone else pays for the integration then upgrade with a lowish end radar.

    Extend puma and herc life dependant upon hours and give about $2 billion back to the exchequer ( dependant upon frigate buy) to hold a big party with!

    I agree with a lot of Chaffers stuff here. certainly like the idea of investing to reduce maintenance costs

    With that existing kit it seems that they either face a real existential threat or have ambitions to be a regional power (or both) so I would look at using some of those spare billions to generate a decent AIP boat force. I would also be tempted to go the Indian route and look to maximise ties with vendors from different nations (alliances being even more important than kit)

    in reply to: Falklands – cruise missiles strike. #2025168
    Al.
    Participant

    I think also what I really thought would be to have Tomahawks – just having the ability to target airfields should anything start would be helpful. The targets are non moving and we know them already, basically. Just a thought.

    And they are in our inventory so are a known engineering quantity

    in reply to: Falklands – cruise missiles strike. #2025184
    Al.
    Participant

    I’m not familiar with terrain on the Falklands,

    The IS a metalled road you know* but otherwise you are pretty spot on about lack of transport infrastructure

    * which famously eats land rovers, as the drainage ditches are 12 times deeper than they need to be as the civil engineers read the figures for annual rainfall (about the same as UK) decided there must be an error and the figure must be for monthly and unilaterally specced them unnecessarily (and dangerously) too deep accordingly!

    in reply to: Frankenplane Prototypes #2234341
    Al.
    Participant

    [QUOTE=mike currill;2195883]

    This is why the British F-4s with Speys had a lower max operational ceiling and lower “max speed at altitude” than the J79-powered F-4s, even though they put out more thrust than the J79s on the test stand.

    Also the Spey had a cross section quite a bit larger than the J-79 so it increased drag. Most of the extra thrust was required to overcome the extra drag.

    Part of the story.

    Although it was part of a British obsession with re-engining everything possible with Speys* and did not bring all of the touted benefits (and inevitably cost more than expected)

    it did provide more oomph on takeoff which was important when operating off of a carrier which was right at the bottom end of necessary size, and gave better low altitude performance and had a lower fuel burn

    * which I occasionally spoof and occasionally think could legitimately have been taken further.

    in reply to: Frankenplane Prototypes #2234612
    Al.
    Participant

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]234529[/ATTACH]

    EE Lightning updated

    http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m309/ChernayaAkula/WhIf/F-5Ewith_trapezoidal_wingsbuttefly_taildiverterless_inlet_zpsfa66c1b8.png

    F-5 demonstrator for YF-23 flight controls

    http://fc09.deviantart.net/fs70/i/2014/129/2/f/yf_56n_sea_magnum_render_3_by_venom800tt-d7hr3d1.jpg

    MKI mates with Typhoon

    The EE Lightning was always powerful rather than pretty but you have managed what I always thought was impossible and made it look even uglier. Perversely I am quite impressed!

    That Tiffie MKI hybrid looks very manga Tomcat analogue

    in reply to: How would you re-build the Argentinian military aviation? #2234616
    Al.
    Participant

    Trash-talking the UK about the Falklands Island can be done without any actual air power and in fact it’s probably better that way, because that way there’s no danger of the international community taking it seriously.

    Absolutely. And with the added advantage that with no capability to mount an invasion there is no risk of starting a conflict where actual people will die.

    If I was (were?) rebuilding Argentinian air power on behalf of current regime with current priorities I would stick to faffing about and neglecting to buy anything. Cheap short term political capital and PR sleight of hand without any risk of getting into a fight.

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 956 total)