If the Kyndas were the closest units then the JMSDF might have been able to split their resources and take out two rather one
I do not pretend to be an expert on skimmers, but I think that you miss a fundamental difference between 80s era Sea Sparrow and Evolved Sea Sparrow. The latter is a capable system fitted alongside (a variety of) illuminators which can do clever time -sharing tricks. The former was/is little better than useless.
Soviet-era Surface Action Groups were designed specifically to saturate and overwhelm US CBGs
(Which obviously led to tail-wagging-dog as US CBGs were then improved to deal with saturation attacks from Soviet-era SAGs and so on and so on)
No disrespect to 80s era JMSDF but they simply did not have the air defence in depth to deal with this opposition. Neither were they ever designed to have the kind of ASuW systems to engage their foe*
That JMSDF composition was to prosecute Soviet submarines. And they would have done so very professionally.
But against that opposition the JMSDF would have disengaged and come up with a Plan B.
*I forget the number but it’s big (at least two zeros at the end) of Harpoons which planners reckoned would be needed to sink a Kiev or a Kirov. I reckon that JMSDF go em-con use the two dog-leg capability of even early model Harpoons to engage the nearest unit from multiple directions and whilst it is busy they make like John Wayne and the shepherd
If its true and it passes all of the hurdles and meddling (that is not a dig at Argentina, that applies to any defence procurement) this all seems VERY sensible
Pukara, SE and Mirage have all served Argentina very well and are known quantities
(The most recent Mirage F1s look excellent and would be a very strong addition)
Incremental improvements in numbers, spares and capability with these airframes would all be welcome. Far more so than the nebulous ideas of buying a handful of exotic, exciting, sexy and expensive aiframes with expensive new supply chains and maintenance requirements.
Some components just need to forged (it aligns the grains don’t you know)
I remember when CNC machined bicycle components were all the rage and my mates went through loads of pretty bright blue or pink anodised aluminium machined components when a single dull old drop-forged steel one would have lasted if not forever then certainly the lifetime of the bike (maybe even the owner)
I’m willing to guess that the loads (static and dynamic) applied to warplane components will be several orders of magnitude larger
I think Taranis is of interest to some people (and that is more uniquely British than Concorde). I do agree though, that without having any context to these models, they are just that. I mean BAE had some real cutting edge designs in the 90s, and now it makes the ar$e of the F35 for a living.
BAe’s real money comes from asset-stripping small companies it buys up. And buying small US firms to sell to the US government.
If new planes are going to be produced anyway, why not stealth them up a bit ? I think he’s talking about new models.
The USN is unusual in that will purchase a significant number of new airframes. So stealthing up the Super Hornet can be a big project (I’d want them to sort out those ridiculously canted pylons and do way with clerical tails but might be in a minority)
Any next-gen Raf will be a much smaller buy so the mods will perforce be more modest. Especially so since the French have a very sensible policy of wearing airframes out before scrapping them.
France and Sweden have both fielded Stealthy surface ships (earlier than most) and both have successful submarine industries. So they have a good knowledge base.
They also have a track record of using their airframes until they wear out (rather than binning them with plenty of usable hours like we in the UK do) so I cannot see either fielding a VLO version of what they already have. VLO UCAVs (as well as winning in acronym bingo) gives them a new capability so look more likely.
I found this looking for Advanced Tomcat designs (inspired by the thread on this site)
[ATTACH=CONFIG]251737[/ATTACH]
Photo from https://warisboring.com/grounding-the-ayatollah-s-tomcats-d02551f1104e#.b3lndiqup
beautiful aircraft. Cross between a Avro Aero and a su 34
The classic example of an aircraft which looks like it’s breaking the sound barrier when it’s stationary
Exclusive: Japan to Speed Up Frigate Build to Reinforce East China Sea – Sources (excerpt)
Looks interesting doesn’t it?
The only other info I can find is this picture http://www.defenseworld.net/news/13160/Mitsubishi_Unveils_Japan___s_Future_3000_Ton_FFX_Frigate
It will be interesting to see what comes next
I still fail to imagine a scenario where both Typhoon and a vlo theatre bomber
If the VLO asset is a UCAV then politically and operationally it might very well be preferable to have an inhabited aircraft in the same area
There is also the fact that by emitting the VLO asset becomes less VLO. LPI is not NPI.
Assuming that my hindsight genuinely was 20/20
Common electronics in separate airframes
Firm price contracts
Not try to rationalise competing companies down and reduce future competition
Have prototypes and sort the issues out in them before trying to manufacture in quantity
Have some kind of conflict of interest laws and regulations (poor decisions do not need to be due to deliberate corruption and neither is inadvertant bias limited to the US procurement process)
Number the airframes properly (F24, F25, F26)
Spend money on long and slim munitions rather than on fitting short and fat bays on the new designs
Well, beautifull undoutebly, but they get all dirty…
naysayer
Black
I’ve aways wanted a black car but buying second hand has always meant that colour is the lowest on my list of criteria
I’ve got a black car now and it deals with potholes and speed bumps better than any of my previous ones. And it’s easy to get in and out of, has plenty of headroom and carries me, wife, three boys and approximately a ton of youth football kit easily
Black cars are best
In a sensible world the US Army would have control (in all senses) of their own CAS and COIN
And I don’t say that to be listerine: we go one stage further in the UK by not letting the British Army have control of Utility and Transport helos