dark light

Al.

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 956 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Impressive Weapons Load 2 (again) #2197934
    Al.
    Participant

    I’ve been looking for a picture of an RAF nimrod with a full weapons load.

    Seconded

    My Google-Fu is too weak on this one (I’ve found a couple of nice pics of plastic kits but as a very angry poster here points out, that’s not quite the same; there’s also a good alternative history build of Nimrod as stand off nuke carrier)

    in reply to: Why the love for the Super Crusader? (XF8U-3 Crusader III) #2132672
    Al.
    Participant

    Why the love for the Crusader III?

    Coz I grew up reading the coffee table warplane books of the 80s where the Phantom was painted as a disaster and the USN as idiots for neglecting a gun on their fighters.

    In that light, the super-high-performance Crusader seemed like such a better proposition.

    Later on I discover that a) the Crusader III didn’t have gun either b) the stories about NASA Crusader III pilots wiping the floor with USN Phantom pilots may have been exaggerated c) Phantom performance over Vietnam was not completely disastrous anyway

    Much like with my other cherished ‘everybody knows‘ opinions from the same period of my childhood (TSR2 was the best ever and we were idiots for cancelling it, P1154 would have been amazing, if only the RN had still had Ark and Eagle the Argentinian junta would never have invaded FI and if they had it would have been a lossless walkover for the UK) I’m now prepared to think that the truth may have been a little more nuanced.

    Al.
    Participant

    I’d be amazed (but happy I love the looks of the design) if the Yak 141 had a better range than the Mig29k

    There are absolutely areas where its performance would/would have beaten the various maritime Harriers

    IF (and I do not have any data to hand to tell me yay or nay) it could launch and land like the Harrier then the ability to conduct air ops in horrible conditions would have been far better than the Mig. That may have made it the better alternative for the USSR all by itself. For India I’m not so sure.

    in reply to: Canadian Fighter Replacement #2142622
    Al.
    Participant

    On a hobbyists forum we will all champion our favourite airframe. Frankly it would be weird if we did not.

    But I maintain that we don’t actually know what the Canadian requirements are. I’m slightly concerned that the Canadians don’t either.

    Range?
    Twin engine system redundancy?
    Single engine running costs?
    Interoperability with its nearest neighbour?
    Independence from its nearest neighbour?
    (What does Canada see as its nearest neighbour? I’m going to assume USA but that is an assumption)
    Common cause with similar nation states?
    Alliance with non-traditional allies?
    Air Defence?
    Air Superiority?
    Expeditionary warfare?
    Low maintenance footprint?
    Low purchase price?
    Low operating cost?
    Short runway capability?
    Commercial opportunity for domestic manufacturers?

    I could put those in any order I wanted and justify any of the current fighters as being the best and most obvious choice

    I can pretty much guarantee that after the Upholder fiasco* they won’t buy from the UK though.

    *regardless of technical failings on the Canadian side, charging to rescue sailors of an ally who stood by our side through two wars was revolting.

    in reply to: Cougar/Puma series vs Black hawk series #2152363
    Al.
    Participant

    My knowledge is dated but I thought that in terms of troup capacity it was in round figures

    Blackhawk 10
    Puma 15 to 20
    Mi-8 25

    Al.
    Participant

    Absolutely correct

    Two additional complications. Open bow doors make more noise than closed bow doors. Opening bow doors generates a signal which can be detected.

    So dilemma: stooge around with bow doors open making a bigger noise (and suffering hydrodynamic inefficiency and generate dynamic stresses on your fish) or sneak around with bow doors closed and make a distinct and characteristically threatening signal when preparing to let loose?

    Al.
    Participant

    The bizarre irony of military procurement continues: EAP would have been a better fit for German, Italian and Spanish Eurofighter needs. Whilst the Typhoon as it is better fits the RAF’s needs. Politically and economically that is not the case for either. And the reasons are all political and economic.

    in reply to: NATO names or local names, which do you prefer? #2156746
    Al.
    Participant

    I grew up on the standardised* reporting names so that’s what I prefer

    To the extent that I tend to zone out when reading the (quite legitimate and nothing wrong with them at all) local names

    *I never knew that they weren’t NATO reporting names, so something new learned today

    Al.
    Participant

    TSR.2. Can say about the same things as the XB-70, but still some lament its cancellation some 50 years later. More neutral analysis suggests it may have not been so great in service, and it’s slab sided fuselage and forward crew stations would have made for a brutal ride and jarred the black boxes. Again I love the plane, but it’s time for folks to let it go.

    I am very much in the ‘a plague on both your houses‘ camp when it comes to UK politicians and (especially) defence spending, procurement and decisions. So emotionally I’m tied to the TSR would have been great if we’d only bought the damned thing (and it does look gorgeous). But having spoken to friends of my Dad (which tells us just how long ago the whole debacle was) who told me that the crabfats were REALLY worried about the maintenance issues with TSR2 I tend to agree: bullet dodged

    I’ll add F14. Engines didn’t work as advertised, US DoD refused to address this (even though the fix was conceptually so simple it was arguably harder NOT to fix than to fix). The multi-target interception capability was very carefully stage-managed. That said: if the purpose of a Cold War Fleet Interceptor is to prevent anybody attacking your flat top then hype is probably an important part of the weapon system.

    F35 is in the words of the Chinese premier asked about the consequences of the French Revolution ‘too early to judge‘. The initially offering WAS ridiculously over-hyped. What we will get IS disappointing. However it may be that the basket of capabilities we get does genuinely change the way that air wars are fought*. Ask me again in another decade.

    *or even better; avoided

    in reply to: battle of the sexiest: BBW version #2183936
    Al.
    Participant

    for all you who like em jolly and big boned

    what are your candidates

    I nominate

    https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/d0/93/4d/d0934dab3c080847389f51fd44a6fc2f.jpg

    You say potato I also potato there’s no other way of pronouncing that word. But, the Victor is not jolly and big boned it’s a curvaceous beauty in the Marilyn Monroe mould.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2198849
    Al.
    Participant

    What has been once the M$ question is now the Million time repeated answer.

    The first time I’ve seen it answered (although I’m sure that others follow JSF more closely than I do)

    If that is the official genuine answer then it is very good news for many nations

    in reply to: If you had to choose between Rafale or F-35 #2201995
    Al.
    Participant

    a single bite of British snails would probably kill you.

    Well certainly make one ill. More than one GB restaurant has forgotten to purge the little gastropods first

    On our hols to France this summer my middle son (who is keen to try anything once) was absolutely gutted to order Steak Hachette au Cheval to find that it was just BEEF steak minced and reformed with a fried egg sat on top (‘Like a rider on ‘orseback n’est pa?’) rather than the actual Horse he thought he’d ordered

    in reply to: USAF not F-35 thread #2203073
    Al.
    Participant

    Lovely

    May be even deserving of a cross post to the ‘just a nice pic’ thread?

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -V #2011865
    Al.
    Participant

    HMS Westminster Completes Extensive Refit Programme in Portsmouth

    Pros: bigger CAAM farm than I was expecting
    I like that they have addressed some of the issues which are not headline-grabbing (algae reduction and accommodation)
    Removing the high up Sea Wolf tracker weight must bring all kinds of stability and fatigue advantages
    They look lower, longer and meaner with the change of radars (plural) up top

    Cons:
    All of my pie in the sky dreams have been popped
    Still the orphaned Mk8 4.5″
    Still no Spearfish
    Still no VLA
    I had hoped that the old SW tracker positions would be used for something exciting and warry
    No mention of softkill
    No mention of anti-torpedo

    I wonder how much over-budget BAEs went on this contract?

    in reply to: Seeking An Evocative Phrase #2204683
    Al.
    Participant

    But in this case, there will be no-one else to intrigue. I am probably the only visitor she will have had, or is ever likely to have.

    That latter is rather sad and melancholic but don’t be too sure of the former.

    Many years ago (over a decade) I took my eldest son (then but a toddler) for a walk in what turned out to be delightfully British weather so we took shelter in the local church yard. Number one son was fascinated by all of the gravestones, flowers and inscriptions (even unable to read most of the words). And spent ages hunched over studying one in particular. Whilst he was looking I noticed an elderly lady hanging around near the entrance/exit. When finally my boy had had enough we left. As we did so (and bear in mind horizontal rain on the South Coast of England on a foul November day and she had been waiting for at least 30 minutes all ingredients for exposure and enough I would suggest to send most people packing) said lady tapped me on the arm and asked oh so sweetly ‘Was it sudden? They boy’s mother did she suffer? I’m so sorry for your loss‘ Cue: me having to explain the actual situation. I’ve always taken great comfort from such stoicism and humanity from that old lady. And regret to this day not having had the presence of mind to ask about her loss.

    I suspect that at least one other regular visitor will notice your new token and have their life brightened by the associated mystery. Even if none of her family or (other) friends) will be able to.

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 956 total)