dark light

Soren-a

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Danish Merlin Mk512 sensor fit. #2546925
    Soren-a
    Participant

    Hi

    I just found this thread and wanted to pitch in what I know about the transfer of the Danish TTT Merlins to the RAF.

    The Royal Danish Air Force have taken delivery of all the 8 SAR Merlins that it had ordered, and training is well under way with crews converting from the Sea King to the Merlin. The Merlin is expected to begin taking over the SAR duty from about August next year.

    As it has been mentioned in this thread one of the reasons that Denmark agreed to let the RAF get the Merlins before them, is that the RDAF does not have enough pilots train to fly the 6 TTT Merlins. Also the TTT models are not needed as badly as the SAR versions are.

    Regards
    Søren Augustesen

    in reply to: F-16 with refuelling probe on droptank #2511686
    Soren-a
    Participant

    Hi Peter

    Thats what I was looking for.

    Thanks.

    Regards
    Søren Augustesen

    in reply to: F-18E/F vs F-18A/B #2581887
    Soren-a
    Participant

    Hi

    Since it is proberly true that none/very few of the people in this forum will ever fly the Super Hornet, I found this rather interesting articel written by an Australian defence analyst, how got a backseat ride in a F model:

    http://www.saunalahti.fi/fta/aviat-5.htm

    Regards
    Søren Augustesen

    in reply to: Finally – the Danish EH101 arrive! #2595881
    Soren-a
    Participant

    Have any difficulties arose from Merlins entering service? As far as i know they were fine with the RAF, but some of you seem less than pleased?

    There have been some problems with the flght control software for the Danish Merlins (something about automatic hovering), and there have also been problems with the possibility of cracks in the tail rotor. The Danish Airforce has accepted delivery of the helicopter only because the manufacture will check and replace the tailrotor assembly at short intervals at their own cost.

    But perhaps ATC_pal could shed some light upon why the danes went with EH101 while Norway, Sweden and Finland went with NH90? (Both Norway and Sweden ordered helos for sea rescue as well).

    The reason the danish air force selected the Merlin and not the the NH-90, was that they wanted a helicopter where people (especially the doctors on SAR missions) could stand upright, which they can’t in the NH-90. Norway and sweden wanted a helicopter that could land on their ships, which the Merlins can’t because it is to big. So the three contries had requierments that could not be fullfilled in a single helicopter, so instead of compremising, they brought what suited their needs best.

    Regards
    Søren Augustesen

    in reply to: Your best pics of 2004 #2638175
    Soren-a
    Participant

    D rebel over the Nikon D-70 i’d go with the nikon… has a faster shutter speed so better for military action… almost same price…

    the sigma lens must be a bitch to buy… how can you afford such a thing…??? i’m assuming your not a pro photographer.

    The D Rebel and Nikon D70 has roughly got the same shutter speeds in the area you would normally use (1/250s – 1/1000s). The Nikon is however better at continues shoting when you just hold down the button at click away. Image quality is about the same.

    The sigma lens was not to bad. I paid about £500 for it some 5 years ago, toke me quite a while to save up for it as photography is just my hobby.

    How far were you standing from the planes?

    The Super Hornet, Fokker 60 and second Mirage 2000 picture was taken at the departures day at RIAT at fairford where you a pretty close to the runway – 2-300 meters I guess. The first Mirage 2000 and the F-16 picture, the planes were quite high, and I have cropped a lot of air around the planes away.

    Regards

    in reply to: Your best pics of 2004 #2638472
    Soren-a
    Participant

    Hi

    I use a Canon 300D/Digital Rebel camera. All the pictures, except the Super Hornet one, was taken with a Canon 75-300mm lens. The Super Hornet one was taken with a Sigma 170-500mm lens.

    If you like you can find more pictures at my homepage. I have just redesigned the page, so if anyone drops by feel free to send me a comment on the look and usefullness of the site 🙂

    Regards

    in reply to: Your best pics of 2004 #2638881
    Soren-a
    Participant

    Hi

    Great thread, and nice pictures.

    Here are some of my best shots from 2004:

    http://www.aviationphotos.dk/images/tigerMeet2004_11.jpg

    http://www.aviationphotos.dk/images/riat_2004_23.jpg

    http://www.aviationphotos.dk/images/riat_2004_33.jpg

    http://www.aviationphotos.dk/images/riat_2004_32.jpg

    http://www.aviationphotos.dk/images/tigerMeet2004_13.jpg

    Regards
    Søren Augustesen

    in reply to: For Mirage Phanatics #2697619
    Soren-a
    Participant

    Here is a link to a great low-flying video with Mirage F.1’s:

    http://hvvagner.free.fr/fous.avi (23mb but worth the download!)

    Regards

    in reply to: Mil Av photos and guides #2663554
    Soren-a
    Participant

    Hi Matt

    Im not going to say that I can give you the perfect guideline to how to take great aviation pictures, but I can give you a few tips.

    On the ground:

    1. Practice

    2. If you are using a digital camera – take tons of pictures from all angles and don’t be afraid to experiment – you can always delete the pictures

    3. Practice

    In the air:

    1. Practice

    2. Learn how to “pan” – that is follow the aircraft in the viewfinder and take the picture when it looks good in the viewfinder.
    This will take some pratice to get really good at it. Start with short exposure time 1/500s or faster, and as you get better you can try slower speeds to get the blured back ground.

    3. Practice

    4. Luck. A bit of luck always helps. The more you practice the less
    luck you need to get a great shot.

    5. Practice

    Well I hope you can use this list – and happy shooting 😀

    Regards

    in reply to: First RDAF C-130J arrives #2676754
    Soren-a
    Participant

    Hi

    Here is the same picture (to save you from using the link)

    Regards

    in reply to: Funniest quotes #2680667
    Soren-a
    Participant
    in reply to: Meanest looking ordnance #2671223
    Soren-a
    Participant

    Hi

    According to the book: “Modern Attack Aircraft” by Mike Spick, the RAF suffered the following Tornado losses during the 91 Gulf War:

    1: Tornado carrying general-purpose bombs
    2: Tornado carrying JP233 – hit after munitions was delivered
    3: Hit by missile during loft-bombing
    4: Hit during high-loft bomb run
    5: One of its bombs exploded prematurely
    6: Shot down during high level laser bombing

    The Italian Air Force also lost a Tornado, when it tried to carry out the attack without support.

    Regards
    Søren Augustesen

    in reply to: Czech Republic chooses Swedish Gripen fighters over US F-16s #2685838
    Soren-a
    Participant

    If you set national emotions aside, I think the problem with the “wait until 2006-7 and buy another fighter” idea, is that if the Czechs wait until 06-07 to order the JSF for example they will properly have to wait until 2009-10 before they can be delivered, and I think it will be very hard and expensive to keep the MiG-21s flying that long – most likely more expensive that leasing Gripens.

    Then in 10 years time when the lease expeiers they are free to buy another fighter i they want to, and by that time planes like the JSF will be available faster, and the need to replace the Gripen will not be as urgent as the need to replace the MiG-21’s are now.

    Well just my two cents on this.

    Happy hollidays to all 🙂

    Regards
    Søren Augustesen

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)