dark light

King Jester

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 138 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Does Argentina have cruise missiles #1795554
    King Jester
    Participant

    A very weird spin-off for this topic came into my atention last week.
    Apparently some Chilean and Peruvian military enthusiasts forums (for those who don´t know, there is a real itch between those two countries) have been cranking up the paranoia syrene, pointing out that “Argentina has ballistic missiles pointed at Chile”…..LOL LOL LOL

    The funny part to this story, is that (according to a “reputable non- accredited independant new agency“) argie Defense Ministress Ms. Nilda Garré was called over the “red phone” by her chilean pair and asked for a credible explanation for the alledged “missiles”. Ms. Garré, a former ´70´s left guerrilla leader, who has an axe to grind against everybody who wears a uniform, promptly put several army generlas and navy admirals under investigation for “unauthorized missile pointing” at a friendly country (apparently Ms. Garré doesn´t know that the country for which she IS THE DEFENSE MINISTRESS doens´t have any ballisitc missiles). Always according to this reputable non-accreditted source, the Ministress sent a dude down South with a GPS and a digital camera to make sure the evil right-wing generals were not trying to trick her into believing that there are only oil drilling cranes there.

    Link in spanish here : http://www.totalnews.com.ar/detalle_noticia_arch.asp?cod_noticia=20310&fecha=20070621

    21/06/2007 GARRE SOLO HACE INTELIGENCIA DE VIDEOGAMES

    Nilda Garré recibió una comunicación por el “teléfono rojo”, el sistema que se activa para intercambiar datos sensibles entre ministerios, de su par trasandino José Goñi. Los chilenos creyeron ver el fantasma del Condor II, aquel vector estratégico desarrollado durante la gestión de Raúl Alfonsín,en suelo argentino, más precisamente a 50 kilómetros de Río Gallegos, la ciudadela del presidente Kirchner. Sucedió a principios de junio y se mantuvo en silencio por esas cuestiones de la disciplina del secreto que impone la actividad de inteligencia. Sin embargo el tema tratado fue -para calificarlo suavemente- un dislate de esos que pasan a la historia del anecdotario cómico del espionaje.

    Funny indeed, or should I be wheeping…well, Ms. Garre said, when questioned about a strange FAL spares export to the US at ludricous prices that her ministry authorized, that she does not know “what a FAL is“.

    King Jester

    in reply to: Current Mirage III/5/50 Operations #2524204
    King Jester
    Participant

    Following a deadly accident last 1st of May, the entire M III fleet of the argie Af has been grounded, till further inquiries are concluded.

    The aircraft was performing a demosntration flight , and apparently one of the supersonic underwing fuel tanks jettisoned for no reason, the plane turned over and crashed into a nearby field. The pilot died in the crash.

    Much speculation has been made since, as the day of the crash was somewhat cloudy, and spatial disorientation has been called to blame for the crash, as it was said that the pilot should have been able to control the plane despite loosing one underwing tank.

    No official accident report is out yet, nor is there any estimate when the M III fleet will be flying again. AFAIK Dagger´s and M-5 P´s (Maras) are operative.

    Will keep you posted,

    King Jester

    PS: Christian V., vos por ahi sabes algo más del tema?

    in reply to: Does Argentina have cruise missiles #1798336
    King Jester
    Participant

    You’ll find it here. Looks like a large target drone on launcher.

    51°58’03.41″S 69°11’57.61″W

    Well, sorry to disapoint you all guys, no secret “Scud-x” launcher here. Its oil drilling equippment, the whole area is a huge oil field, clustered with towers, pumps, cranes, worker camps and colector pipes. Just look at the size of the “object”, its 15 to 20 meters long (you can compare the size to a standart shipping container, there are several on nearby camps).

    I agree it can certainly fool anybody (including me) by the odd shape, winged-like appearence, but no, just drilling equippment.

    King Jester

    PS: Wasn´t it Saddam who secretly tried to centrifuge uranium with oil drilling pipes? I´m pretty sure Colin Powel showed pictures just like this one on the UN assembly couple of years ago… :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Does Argentina have cruise missiles #1798339
    King Jester
    Participant

    You’ll find it here. Looks like a large target drone on launcher.

    51°58’03.41″S 69°11’57.61″W

    Have no Google Earth on my home computer, so I will have to check tomorrow at work, but those coord’s place it somewhere in the middle of Santa Cruz, Patagonia.
    My bet is some odd oil drilling equippment, a crane, or the like.

    Cheers,

    King Jester

    PS: It could be an airport escalator, thought 😀

    in reply to: Does Argentina have cruise missiles #1798376
    King Jester
    Participant

    Sorry for the basic question but can somebody tell me want type of missiles this is? Thanks

    Hi Nonpilot, it would help if you give us the exact coordinates to the picture, and the height at which you got the screenshot. I´m no Google Earth expert, but that thing must be darn big to show that much detail on Google Earth (i.e., an Exocet or Harpoon would be hardly recognizable given the resolution of image Google has).

    So, where exactly is that thing? :confused:

    King Jester

    in reply to: Navy news from around the world, news & discussion #2063781
    King Jester
    Participant

    Few days ago the argie icebreacker Almt. Irizar (Q05) caught fire while returning to her homeport after completing its 25 + antarctic summer season.

    http://www.clarin.com/diario/2007/04/11/um/thumb/boat2.jpg

    Damage is extensive, yet another two Sea Kings got lost (in 1994 two were lost aboard ARA Bahia Paraiso, which run aground and sunk), while there are no human losses to mourn.
    The captain is still abord, everybody else had to abandon ship and brought to safety. The ship is stable, but has no own power, and will be towed to port for repairs.

    Next summer antarctic campaign (scientific studies and base repleshment) are at least , uncertain.

    King Jester

    in reply to: World of Lürssen #2065387
    King Jester
    Participant

    Hi,

    I think this one is pretty good:

    http://www.schnellboot.net/laender2.html

    Cool, many thanks!

    King Jester

    in reply to: World of Lürssen #2065397
    King Jester
    Participant

    Nice work mconrads, keep it up!

    BTW, would you happen to know a comprehensive online source for profiles of ALL FAC classes? (i.e. Combattate, SAAR, Swift, italian Sparvieros, Vosper, also OSA types and so forth).

    I´ve alwasy tinkered around with the idea of putting together a web site jsut for FAC´s (pretty much my pet-vessels), but haven´t come around timewise.

    King Jester

    in reply to: A question about side-by-side jet trainer #2505511
    King Jester
    Participant

    I would have bet the Morane Saulnier MS 760 was the first…but it was beaten by four years by the Avmpire, posted by fighting-irish.

    http://www.bartoli.com/safo/articles/ms7602d.JPG

    Thank you bartoli (hereever you are) for the picture.

    On a side note, the argie FAA will finally phase out the MS 760, after its 40th anniversary in service. Nobody seems to know what is going to replece it, as there are not enough IA-63 Pamapas in service to cover the required flying hours for pilot qualification. Guess ist more of the same: bleed the FAA till its dry…

    King Jester

    in reply to: Military Learjets from Argentina #2505571
    King Jester
    Participant

    Another picture, this time post-war (possibly in somwhere in the 90´s) of T24 and T25, with the Flaklands/Malvinas logo on the side of the cockpit, (the little logo refered by hpsuace).

    http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a260/avionesunapasion/Cosas/Learjet.jpg

    King Jester

    in reply to: Military Learjets from Argentina #2511942
    King Jester
    Participant

    Possibly – I refer to the irregular shadow/mark/logo just above the cheat line and directly below the forward part of the cockpit glass, which looks rather like the little stylised Falkland Islands map sported by Argentine units/planes that considered they’d taken an active part in the conflict.
    hps

    Afetr the war all participant (surviving) aircraft did indeed sport the small logo.

    Buty here I think its the shape and shadow of the venturi, as seen here in this shot of a much newer Learjet bizzjet.

    http://blobs.shoppay.be/products/025-Learjet%2045%20exterieur.jpg

    King Jester

    in reply to: Military Learjets from Argentina #2511977
    King Jester
    Participant

    Re the Learjet in flight, if (as you imply) this is from sometime before June 1982, it’s neither T-23 nor T-24: it has the dark blue cheat lines, but lacks the integral centre-section recce pod. As far as I know, the other two photo-recce Learjets of Grupo 1 (T-21 and T-22) also possessed this pod.

    May be, I took the links from the source site without checking to much for time consistency, so you may be right.

    (nb subsequent editing: I failed to notice the little Falkland Islands logo on the nose, which suggests it must be either VR-17 or VR-18 during or after the conflict.)

    I fail to see any logo, you wouldn´t be mistaking the shape and shadow cast by the small air intake venturi beneath the cockpit?

    I have an idea the plane from which it was pictured is the same HS.125-700B shown in your first photo, LV-ALW – borrowed for the duration from the Argentine state oil concern YPF. The last two letters certainly look like LW.

    Very likely indeed, as you clearly can see the aerodinamic strakes (spelling?) on the upper wing of the HS-125 on that picture.

    King Jester

    in reply to: Military Learjets from Argentina #2512000
    King Jester
    Participant

    I would like to see some pixs of the impressed Lears if anyone has them.

    Chris, here are some:
    http://www.redargentina.com/malvinas-argentinas/learjet3.jpg
    This is certainly not a Learjet, but an HS-125 impressed into service.

    http://www.redargentina.com/malvinas-argentinas/learjet2.jpg
    The one on the background is a FAA military executive transport (prolly T-23 or T-24), but the wing on the foreground is certainly a civilian plane.

    King Jester

    PS: As for the subject of the topic, as already said, not a chance a Learjet could have been modifed into an Exocet platform in time. On the other hand, given enough time, may be….argie technicians showed quite a bit of ingenouty while adapting “stuff” such as bomb racks and gunner sight into C-130´s, improvized chaff dispensers on A-4s and Camberras, and finally by putting together the ITB (lorry portable double MM-38 Exocet launcher which damaged HMS Glamorgan) with Exocet containers from a destroyer, a Rasit army radar, a 1938 Siemens searchlight 400 V CC generator and a hand held Texas Instruments TI-51 calculator.
    Also an army Ltnt. mounted two Pucara rocket pods on the roof of an agricultural tractor during the battle for Goose Green.
    And then of course the culinary genius of the ground grunts, who managed to cook, roast, stew, flam, boil, and/or fry indigenous mouton and lamb with just the basic mess kits.

    in reply to: Super Etendard in air combat #2514202
    King Jester
    Participant

    Very much into “what if” territory here, and I’m not well informed about the characteristics of the Phantom, but in general I’d think the answer is a definite yes. The SHARs did extremely well and far better than many expected, but the quad-mount for AIM9L came in just too late to be used – the Phantoms would have provided a much greater weapons load (AIM7s plus the AIM9s?) and greater range/endurance, plus they wouldn’t have had to break off, as the SHARs did a number of times, when those Mach-2 Mirage IIIEAs and Daggers out-accelerated them heading homeward.
    Mind you, if we’d still had a Phantom-bearing carrier the Argentinean junta might not have nerved itself to make a move…
    hps

    IRCC this was done a few years back on the ACIG forum. IRCC Jonesy pointed out and showed actual RN figures comparing operative status of conventional CATO carries (i.e HMS Arc Royal with Phantoms) vs. STOVL operations (i.e. Invincible class + SHAR) in dire weather conditions (and South Atlantic has some of the worst, more so in winter).
    Don´t remember the exact figures, but CATO was severly limited as compared to STOVL, which would have outbalanced inherent weapon system superiro performance enveloppe.
    Needless to say, argie aircraft was pretty much limited to nice weather ops, anyway, and little if any at all missions were flown under foul weather, anyway.

    King Jester

    in reply to: Lonely ADV Tornado #2518993
    King Jester
    Participant

    The rumour is that they want the Typhoon at MPA before the end of the 2007. I suppose we’ll have to wait and see.

    I may be wildly missunderstanding the previous, does MPA stand for Mount Pleasent Airbase? If so, what the heck the urgence for? Forward fielding a fairly new system (theething problems and what not expected during system introduction, plus shortage of qualified flying personel — BTW, South Atlantic is a demanding environment for pilots and machines — plus the infrastructure nightmare of setting up a 4 AC squad. when airbases at home aren´t even ready yet to take the Thypoon….)

    If the MOD or the RAF are selling the “Falkland issue” to the UK voter as being of “high concern” then they are fooling the british nation and selling them a “red herring” for some other thing they wish to cover up or get out of the scope. Its utter BS and ignores reality completly. The level of thread is possibly at its lowest in years, with the last 5 years of “progre”* government in Argentina (and prolly more to come), with the lowest serviciability of argie AF systems in years, both transport and combat, with no anphibious asset on the argie navy at all to speack off, whatsoever, and a general rejection of “military endeavours”.

    No need for Thypoons, or even F.3´s, IMO. Don´t get me wrong, Argentina is going to upheld its claim on the Malvinas for as long as it takes, but a military solution is out of the question for the foreseable future. You can expect comercial sanctions, some of which we have already set in practice, such as limiting comercial airliners headed for the Falklands to overfly argie airspace, etc etc.

    * “progre” may need an explanation, whcih isn´t easy, as it is a complex thing. Stands for “progresista”, whcih is kind off a mix of some socialist concepts, such as universal and gratuituos heahlt care (good thing IMO), with some corporativist concepts such as state run basic infrastructure services (not a bad thing per se, but bad cause its used to create artificial employement) , all with a thick spread of “extreme warranties” for human rights, union rights, minority rights, and all kind of rights. Basically its the model of the state with no policing force what so ever, where everytihng is allowed and warranted. In this “progre” model, all authority figures are bad, which in practice means that police can´t detain (after all , everything is allowed), judges can´t condem (after all offenders have rights, right?), and all military resembling has been cornered up, and systematically brocken down. The argie armed forces have suffered such a strong purging, I doubt they will ever recover.

    Soory for dragging the topic of course, but I´m really surprised the MOD is manuevering the way it is, in regards to the “Falkland issue”. Last weeks press release stating to “being well prepared to face an agresion” was kind of unnecessary provocation, too.

    King Jester

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 138 total)