Although this would better fit the Tiger Meet topic, this special scheme is still the sweetest Tiger ever:

Source: http://www.airshots.com
King Jester
Mirage IIICJ C-717, last flyworthy IIIC in the world, during an airshow in Buenos Aires. The aircraft flies regularly for the CEASO (Centro de Ensayos Armas y Sistemas Operativos) of the FAA.

Source: aeroespacio.com.ar
King Jester
Here the 25th Anniversary Mirage IIIEA in special scheme.

Source: Spotter.com.br
More to follow….
Indeed KJ it is a wealth of info, thanks for shearing. Maybe you could shead some light on the current plans to build a new Carrier for the Amarda.
You are welcome. BTW, its not insider info, its just filtered info from spanish fora.
As for a new CV, well, err, hmmm, its simply out of the question, for many, many, many years to come. Lets take up this chat in 2020 again, shall we?.
There is no way we can afford a new ship (the BAZAN SAC 220 design will never we build, for the ARA that is), and there is no second hand ship around that even remotely suits ARA’s needs.
I can imagine a scenario where 25 de Mayo would have gotten LM-2500 gas turbines, new catapult and elevators, a DARDO firing system with Breda turrets, Aspides, and a full squadron of SUEs, Turbo Trackers and SH-3H’s operating on a low budget till 2010. We missed that chance in 1985. She rotted away for almost 15 years, and was not replaced.
We missed our second chance in 1998, when we should have opted for MN Clemenceau. With her scrapping the last situable* conventional CV for the ARA is gone.
Nothing of what the US Navy has already mothballed or will in the near future is situable. Those 60.000 tns + behemoths would drain the navy’s scarce yearly resources in a single month. And where should we get 60 + aircraft to operate on them, and 15 escorts and supply ships to form a carrier group. No way, its simply out of the question.
V/STOL carriers are out of the question due to political considerations as well. So are for the time being former soviet carriers and aircraft.
With a tiny fraction of the money, I would rather shop for some additional land based aircraft, such as P-3Cs, and a dozen former Bundesmarine Tornados in full gear **. 😎
King Jester
* suitable, hmm, you still have to put at least 25 aircraft aboard a Clemenceau, and assign her decent escorts. See the Marina de Brasil example.
** Tornados are prolly out of the question due to the same political considerations which leave out secondhand V/STOL aircraft 😉
KJ: mate the only problem with those rounded hangars is the amount of room you have to move in them.
Yes, I prolly overstated that those hangars would fit a Sea Sprite :p
But a Sea Linx should fit nicely. The problem with the tight working space remains, of course.
On the 140 without the hanger, the Box just above the guys head, is that some sort of optics?
Same take on this as Wanshan already posted, some sort of landing aid or some sort of video survilaince for the landing ops, likely.
King Jester
Thanks for clarifying, it’s nice to get some more detail from someone local.
Well, as I said, my take on the limits treaty is prolly skewed. You are welcome, anyway.
About the original topic, I checked again. The strongest offer seems to be IZAR’s BAM design. Mainly cause they would be halfways paid for with soft credits.
The NPO-2000 design is also a candidate, with more punch.
Altought, given the fact that our current MoD cannot distinguish a frigatte from a cruiser (in an interview he has been quoted as calling MEKO 360s “cruisers” and the M-113 a “tank” :rolleyes: ) there is a lot of confusion. The MoD has made several confusing anouncements that “new patrol corbettes” will soon be received. I suspect that in the end some stripped down ex-french A-69 Lorrient avisos will halfways replace the WWII era tugs, which do most of the patroling and outpost resuply nowadays, and no “new” OPV’s will be build at all.
I would propose a stripped down MEKO 140 design, a single 40mm on B-position, a fully enclosed hangar and extended landing deck for a medium SAR helo (say, an AB-212), cranes for hoisting two whaler boats, 40 men crew max (boarding team included), cargo space under the helo deck (eventually mines), finally provisions for chaff launchers, two rigs for heavy MGs, plus provision for one RAM.
King Jester
Interesting stuff there mate, I had no idea about it. So I guess a co-operation deal would be right out then
Just to comment on both Wanshan an your own reply, co-operation is not that far out the question. It really has only become a matter of funds.
Argentina´s navy trusted ASMAR shipbuilders in 1998/2000 to reform ARA D-1 Hercules (former T-42 type) with a wider helo pad and huge hangar. Altought the resulting hybrid is not particularly pretty, the job was well done.
There was some talks about upgrading chilean subs (U-209s) at the MMDG shipyard in Buenos Aires. Finally the deal did not stick.
In the 2002/2003 timeframe there was a serious plan to build a total of 6 MEKO A-200 frigattes (four for Chile and two AAW´s for Argentina) on the Rio Santiago shipyard in Buenos Aires and ASMAR in Valparaiso. Lack of funds posponed the proyect, and Chile bought the secondhand M-class instead.
There was indeed some talks about building a large series of OPVs, for both navies, but then hesitation (lack of a clear idea of what the functions of an OPV are in the argie navy, really) on the argie side posponed the deal again.
Argentina is currently shuffling two or three offers, the strongest one from a spanish shipyard for a total of four OPVs (can´t remember the design name right now), but has in the past also looked closely at the MEKO 100 design, at a portuguise OPV and at a very simplyfied version of the locally build MEKO 140.
The spanish offer is the strongest, cause it includes spanish government soft credits for 200 million $. Spain is interested in keeping shipyards in Galicia alive, so they can afford to spend that kind of money. I personnally would prefer a local solution to the OPV question, a very simplyfied MEKO 140, or may be a carbon copy of the BAZAN Halcon design (which were build in Spain for the argie Coastguard in the 80´s), that way our own shipyard workers would stay in business.
As for the limits treaty, my view may of course be skewed (im argie!), both the ruling of 1977 and the Vatican solution of 1984 violate a basic principle outlined in the 1880 general limits agreement, which states clearly that Chile has souvereignty on the Pacific and Argentina on the Atlantic. By granting the islands to Chile, chilean souvereign waters and ZEE protrude clearly into the Atlantic. Just my two cents.
King Jester
Meko 140 with and without telescopic hangar.
Closer look at the hangar, and a Fennec on board of P44. Here the telescopic hangar can be seen, and its not boxi like the one on the italian Lupo, but rather rounded, like a corrugated sheet shelter, only the door frame being squared.

King Jester
PD: Source, SOARBATS.COM.AR
What I always find interesting is the idea of teloscopic hangers like what the Russians have on some of their ships, IIRC the Lurssen ships used by the UAE have this function, I may be wrong about that though.
With 90 mts length and 1800 tons displacement they are outside the scope of the topic, but argie MEKO 140´s of the second batch have telescopic hangars. I had the info that these hangars are of cannuck design, but may be wrong. The hangars are spacy enough for an Alluette or Fennec (none of ´em having a collapsible tailboom), so even bigger specialized naval helos (Sea Linxs, may be even Sea Sprite) should fit, altought I´m unsure about the landing pad beeing safe for a Sea Sprite.
What about Jaques Cuosteau CALLYPSO? Under 450 tn (TON minehunter) could support* a Schweizer helo AND two minisubs. Now thats impressive!!
* I know, I know…only landing pad, no hangar.
King Jester
Actually, the Confederate Air Force (now called the Commemorative Air Force, actually, but I refuse to recognize the change 😀 ) had a flying B-29 for many years – as recently as 1995, I’m certain. Not sure if they still do, though.
I’m not sure if you may be refering to “FIFI”? There is at least one flyable B-29 named Fifi that regularly visits airshows.
King Jester
I’d rather that she had elected to get the invaders killed instead.
Yes, she should have nuked Gral. Menendez and his whole lot in Port Stanley!!! Err…., no wait a minute, I think there is a flaw on that plan :confused:
Hammer, thanks for sharing the pics. A month ago there was a tread about the VFX and FX programs. A pic of the “non-naval” FX Grumman F-14 proposal was posted then.
Do you have pics of the YC-14 and YC-15?? The later I’m not even sure existed at all. I’ve seen pics of the YC-14 proto rotting away on the Mojave bone-yard. Was there a YC-16 ??
King Jester
TTP wrote:
no question the scene in “Empire of the Sun” when the P-51’s attack the Japanese Airfield!!! “P-51 Cadillac of the sky!!!”
Sends chills down my spine!!! If you haven’t seen it , Rent It!!! defeinately worth the wait!!!!!
Empire of the Sun its a masterpiece to the ultimate detail. Better yet than the P-51 straffing the airfield me likes the scene when the boy craddles into the downed Zero while flying his glider during the fancy ambassador reception.
The camera plays around with the boy sitting in the cockpit, the glider wusshing back and fort, you only hear the soft windnoise of the glider passing by and the boys heavy breathing and his head turning as if he really is in a dogfight…as you said it brings about cold chills running down the spine.
Some pretty awsome “real” “no CGI” scenes in “Air America” with the Turbo Porters landing on a hill.
Whats the movie about Korea with Robert Wagner and William Holden? “Aces over Korea” me thinks, but that may be the computer game. Anyhow, pretty good footage for the late 50´s.
As for worst scenes, how come nobody has mentioned Iron Eagles I, II, III, IIII (err, sorry, that would be IV), and other various sequels??
King Jester
More quizzes, yuummiieee (drooling…)
#1 — Name at least one pure delta jet with a nose intake
Would MIG-21 I qualify? Its kind’a a double delta, really…
#5 — Name the first helicopter with hydraulic main rotor and tail pylon fold system
Westland Wessex?
#9 — Name at least nine British jet-powered fighters/fighterbombers operationally involved in an Iraqi invasion scenario of Kuwait
A 1991 scenario? Tornado Gr and F, Jaguar, Buccaneer, Harrier, Sea Harrier, Hawk 65 (saudi), Hawk 64 (kuwaiti), Hunter (iraki).
Edit: Don’t really get the question, do you mean british manufactured aircraft, or british flown aircraft? And do you mean 1991? Or an hypotethical invasion anytime during the jet age?
#12 — jaunting the histroic department (although it’s still within the post-WW2 requirement): Looking for the last operational flight of the Junkers Jumo 213 engine (the one that powered a.a. the FW190D series and the Ta152)
It also equipped the AVIA 199 (Jumo powered Bf-109 build by Avia), which was used as the “Mule” by the israelis. Guess last flight was prolly around 1955-58, somewhere. Don’t know whose life it saved.
King Jester
Edited cause my neurons are puzzled…
c. … which were targeted in any sort of way by the Dassault Etendard or Super Etendard.
UK, Chad, Cote d’Ivory, Bosnia and Sudan are all correct.
The country i was still waiting for was the US, obviously because of the USS Stark which was hit by one of Iraq’s leased Sues.
I have to side with troung here. USS Stark was indeed hit by Exocet, but launched from an Mirage F-1EQ (or at least so is stated). IRCC by 1987, all 5 leased iraki SUEs had been returned already. So, Iran should be the answer.
King Jester