Yuupieehh, quizztime, quizztime, quizztime!!!!
Not much left unanswered, but here I go:
1.d: The Kamov Hormone Ka-25BT – anti-mine helo?? (http://www.aviation.ru)
3.a: May be Grenada or Panama? You weren’t asking for actual combat, but operational sorties…
Anyhow Bosnia, as Billy said, is prolly the one you were asking for.
3.c: Iran is the missing one, as already mentioned by MPA.
4: I read this one not long ago, missplaced the magazine. I think its the Viggen. Not sure. There is also a commercial aircraft, very well known, which has an ingenious anti-FOD system. Were you referring to this one?
King Jester
dan_pub
Quote:
Originally Posted by flex297
Anyone has an idea whis Air Force or Navy could have this Maritime Patrol DHC-6-300M Twin Otter in its inventory? The badge is huge and clear but I do not recognize it..
The badge looks like Greece or Argentina.
Not argentinian for sure.
This roundel seems to have something, like a crest or so, in the middle. Buggers me why the canadian mapple leaf is on the tail, may be some tech demonstrator by DHC?
King Jester
In Argentina it was a head to head race* between the Gloster Meteor Fmk 4 and the indigenous IA 27 Pulqui.

The lonely prototype flew on August 1947, the Meteors had arrived a few months earlier, but did not really operate in numbers due to lack of pilots with jet training.
King Jester
edit: * a race to be the first jet flown by the FAA, not really a competition to equip the FAA. Meteor and Pulqui were to be complementary. Pulqui II was to be the replacement of the Meteors.
WACHENR0DER wrote:
However for a nearly 3 hour movie it was quite entertaining
Yes, its looong. Nobody warned me, so after holding and holding I had to leave the Theatre and go to the P**sroom, about 20 Minutes from the end. Small bladder, its in the family…
King Jester
Were did they get all the firewood for their burial ceremonies, in a countryside where there is not a single tree left or right?
King Jester
As MarocMirage already mentioned, it’s Israeli. It’s kills are:
8 June 67 – Reuven Rozen – Syrian MiG-17
21 May 69 – Reuven Rozen – Egyptian MiG-21
2 July 69 – Eitan Carmi – Egyptian MiG-21
2 July 69 – Eitan Carmi – Egyptian MiG-21
11 December 69 – Menahem Shmul – Syrian MiG-17
26 February 70 – Amos Amir – Egyptian MiG-21
2 April 70 – Amos Amir – Syrian MiG-21
25 April 70 – Amos Amir – Egyptian Il-28
8 October 73 – Oded Marom – Syrian MiG-17
12 October 73 – Avi Lanir – Syrian MiG-17
17 October 73 – Michael Tzuk – Egyptian MiG-21
19 April 74 – Abraham Shalmon – Syrian MiG-21
19 April 74 – Abraham Shalmon – Syrian MiG-21
Skythe, I could not find the original topic here on the forum…
Do you remember we were trying to clear the MIII CJ 159 mistery?
Well, you were right, the plane the FAA returned to the IAF is not 159. The real 159 is, as already mentioned, a Gate Guardian in Funes, Argentina.
Now, the question is: Why not return the real one?
Cause they pured about 5 tons of concrete into the wings and cockpit floor to keep it on the ground!! Funes is a known twister area.
King Jester
Camaro wrote:
a force of poorly trained conscripts is no match against professional soldiers as it hapened again and again and again
(i`m talking infantry)
The accent is on poorly trained. Poorly trained pros (iraki Rep Guard?) would be no match for well trained conscripts (german Bundeswehr?).
what was the ratio… if i recall,it was 2000 britts against 10,000 argentinians, please correct me if i`m wrong.
The brit Task Force counted some 23000 men total (including sailors, infantry, flying personnel, etc). IRCC nearly 2400 landed on San Carlos the first day and eventually the brit land forces build up to some 7000 total.
There were almost 14000 argies on the islands (again, counting aircraft mechanics, liason, communications, logistics, medics etc). The combat force was about 8000 to 9000 men.
All that said, there was not a single battle were the attacking brits were outnumbered 5 to 1 as you mentioned. Brit fractions faced and dealt with argie defensive positions which held 1.5 or 2 times numerical advantage. Argie infantry was sparcely distributed over wide areas, with good fortifications BTW, but on a “micro-tactical” level (don’t know if the concept is clear…) i.e. within range of infantry weapons such as the L1A or FAL, brit attackers did only face small groups at a time. The rather ineffective argie C3I capabilities to call in fire support, and more on the concept of static ‘trench-warfare” defence adopted by the argies, allowed small brit units to take out sistematically the outer defence lines and by the end of the day, step by step, displace the more numerous argies. As they say about eating an elephant, one bite at the time…
There also were some mass surrendings, as in Goose Green on May 27th, were 450 Paras “captured” 1200 argie defenders. They managed to do the trick cause nearly 500 of the argie “reserve manpower” weren’t even infantry at all, they were AF ground personnel, AAA gunners, even an MP unit IRCC. After the outer defence had collapsed on Darwin isthmus, the assorted reserve was only eager to surrender.
After the cease fire and surrender was signed in Stanley on June 14th, some 3500 argies to the East and the South of town had not had the chance to enter combat at all.
King Jester
Is there anyone who can tell me conclusively whether or not Arg A-4 drivers got any ACM training? I don’t know much about modern air force training regimes, but wouldn’t they have gotten at least some basic training in ACM, given the Scooter’s abilities – also would they not have used the A-4s for CAP (even guns-only) for the Veinticinco De Mayo? Or would they have relied on the Arg Air Force to protect the carrier?
First question: Don’t know for sure. But I don’t think they got more than just basic ACM training. In any case, they had strict orders to avoid engament and escape if possible.
Second question: Only the argie navy A-4s were equipped with AAMs at all (AIM-9Bs IRCC). Strike was their pimary mission, AD their subsidiary mission (same criteria as the Super Etendarts whcih finally replaced them.)
King Jester
Mixtec wrote:
but their has never been an all out war between any countrys in South America in modern history (after Colombus)
Mix, I can think about at least 2 “all out wars” in the XXth century, i.e. Chile vs. Peru and Bolivia (Pisco War), and Bolivia vs. Paraguay (Chaco War).
After Columbus there has been a considerable quota of blood shedded.
But I know what you meant, no classic war (other than civil wars or COIN wars such as in Colombia or Peru) which involved the majority of a country’s population, bigger cities or the occupation of a large part of any country or its capital.
King Jester
ForkTailedDevil wrote:
Apparently trouble is brewing around the Falklands again. The Argentines want to restrict all flights into the Falklands to Argentinian carriers. I know its probably just the Argies being beligerant.
Well, TJ already put up a link which better explains the issue.
TJ wrote:
http://politics.guardian.co.uk/fore…1148092,00.html
Its a simple matter of courtesy, the Uk does not permit local carriers to the islands, why should argies permit non-local (foreign) carriers to overfly argie continental territory or even stop for refuelling? :confused:
Want to get there? Simply fly another route, or step down from the pedestal and reach an agreement…
I´m calm, never mind, I´m calm…. 😉
skythe wrote:
I’ve got a question regarding the Falklands, maybe someone would be kind enough to enlighten me. When the Argentinians invaded the islands back in 1982, why did Britain have to go to war all by itself?
Three items: LGBs, AIM-9Limas and satellites. Definitly not all by itself.
King Jester
PD: A military solution to the Falklands/Malvinas conflict is out of the question, but unauthorized trawlers may get shelled in the near future. 😡
I´m still calm, yes I am.
Skythe wrote:
Speaking of Argentina, the IDF/AF Museum recently received one of our former Mirages back from Argentina. It was supposed to be 13-kills 158, but apparently the Argentians made a mistake and sent 159. So now it’s on display, still bearing Argentinian camo but adorned with its mate’s former identity and kills markings
A couple of words about that Mirage.
First about the camo pattern. The two-tone graysh/greenish on the IAF museum CJ was never argie AF standart. I don’t understand why the AAF freshly painted the Mirage with THAT camo before delivering it back to Israel. May be the only paint buckets at hand were those two colors? They don’t match any argie camo pattern….
The argie CJs flew with these colors (two tone brown/earth) :
But some airframes were painted in this two tone brown/dark green scheme:
About which airframe was returned to Israel, apparently the “real” 159 is AAF C-715, a gate guardian at the Liceo Aeronautico in Funes, Cdba. The aircraft is painted in a fictional three tone camo pattern:
The airframe returned to Israel is C-713 (IAF 142, according to my sources). I don’t know if it was a mistake, or simply a practical question. C-713 was in depot, while C-715 is already a gate guardian at a (somewhat) remote location. Disassembling and shipping C-713 vs. C-715 may simply have been less expensive/complex. But this is just a speculation, it may very well have been a scr** up.
Picture and info source: http://arqueologiaaeronautica.hypermart.net/cazascazabombarderos.htm
King Jester
Distiller wrote:
(two Mirage IIIs callsign Pluton) despite returning home earlier, did in fact take off 30 minutes later from Rio Gallegos (21:50 local) than the Canberras from Trelew (21:20 local). So, that would make Pluton Mirages the last operational sortie to be dispatched.”
Have to make a little correction, the Canberras also took off from Rio Gallegos (at 21:20) instead of Trelew (their home base for most of the war). Don’t know why they were relocated, taking into consideration their range was more than enough to continue operating out of Trelew and Rio Gallegos was quite crowed to begin with (not for night time ops, though).
Didn’t know about the F-28 in Desert Storm, nice to know that.
King Jester
Distiller wrote:
7. — What was the Argentinan Air Force’ last operational involvement in a war? Which aircraft were participating?
*No UN stuff plz*
?
That rules out UNCYFIP (Cyprus) and UNPROFOR (ex-Yugoslavia) ops, but I wouldn’t be sure if it also rules out Desert Storm (with UN approval, but not strickly a UN operation)…
I looked it up, and I think I know what Distiller wants to hear. The surviving Canberra from Bachus flight was the last argie AF plane to return to base, but the fighter cover (two Mirage IIIs callsign Pluton) despite returning home earlier, did in fact take off 30 minutes later from Rio Gallegos (21:50 local) than the Canberras from Trelew (21:20 local). So, that would make Pluton Mirages the last operational sortie to be dispatched.
King Jester
PS: I’ll give up if it isn’t this…
Distiller wrote:
The Robinson Raven is not military and since this is a military aviation forum I don’t count it.
Not that I knew beforehand, just found out myself too, but the R44 Raven is in military use with the Dominican Republic.
That would make two different Raven helos (the Hiller and the Robinson) good answers.
Link:
http://www.fuerzasmildom.com/english/army6a.php
Would have posted a pic, but they seem to be “melted” in the website, can’t link them directly as images. Anybody knows how to do it?
King Jester
Flood wrote:
Just looked again and feel that you are confusing the army UH1Hs that flew medevac with the air force Bell 212s – both of which were at Stanley Racecourse with shrapnel damage on surrender
Yes. You’re right about the 212’s. It were a few Army UH-1s that flew with red crosses till June 16th. Then they were handed over by the argie crews to the brit forces.
Transall wrote:
6)I thought the C-46 was the “Commando”, not Comanche?
If Comanche doesn’t work, may be the Westland Commando (stripped version of the Sea King) will do…Do you want to share the credit for this question?…sort of team work we did here 😀
King Jester