Originally posted by Eric Mc
The “Great Planes” video on the B-36 features some footage of the B-60 on its maiden flight.
Thanks – thats one Ive been after for a while – now even more so!
Originally posted by duxfordhawk
I would say from what i have seen a Barrel roll is more dangerous than a loop and has been involved in many accidents including the Invader at Biggin,I don’t agree that Ray loops at low level but some pilots may do,Also the OFMC has a very good safety record sadly Mark was lost in a landing accident but the BBMF have had landing accidents too,notably Hurricane LF363 landing and fire
a few years ago,Maybe this thread should get back to what it was about?.
The Invader barrel roll was flown by , lets face it a medium bomber overloaded with IIRC 7 souls on board – practice denied or not its just something you dont do in my book!
The loop is the easiest aerobatic manouvere to fly as long as you have enough airspace. A barrel roll is more difficult to fly but flown well there should’nt be a great loss of height from when you enter it to when you finish it. Its also flown around the longitudinal axis which is basically straight and level. Certainly more airshow losses have occured from vertical exit manouveres than horizontal.
I’m also certainly not questioning OFMCs or any others safety records.
All display loops are flown at low level, otherwise there would be no point as they would be too high and out of view!
Mark’s tragedy and the (then) loss of LF363 were landing accidents away from a display venue and of no consequence to this discussion, or rather my tangential posts from the original thread.
Have’nt said anywhere that any of these guys were reckless and certainly not that “they dont know what they’re doing”!!
My original point was that from my memories and videos of ’70s shows, the display flying was very low – MH434, the Reds (partic the opening big 9 from crowd rear – duck!!), JP teams , Belgian Slivers (aaargh!!) Andreason BA4B all flew very low manouveres with little area for any error either pilot or machine caused. A lot made use of opening or closing the routine with a run over the crowd.
Times have changed and display flying has become better contolled but as someone else has said, theres a lot of luck involved if God forbid something does go wrong.
No, IMHO I would prefer to see warbirds flown sympathetically – by all means barrel rolls, wing overs, half cubans rather than full loops etc.
The proof is in the pudding – the BBMF have flown “cautious” display routines for as long as I can remember- without loss.
Throw in low level loops, multiple aileron rolls, Split Ss and we get problems.
Originally posted by 334_Pegasus
Well I’ve noticed the last couple of RIAT’s there have been far less Boscombe Down aircraft than there used to be…. They could at least send an Alpha Jet!
Absolutely!!!!
But now as a cash strapped 90% civilian outfit, having to justify every flight their appearances are pretty much zero.
pathetic really.
Originally posted by COSMIC WIND
Watch Ray’s displays closely. A masterclass in energy management and making the straight forward look difficult, low level. Sadly, I feel, the accidents mentioned stem from poorly executed high risk manouvres, little regard to enegy/ escape gates and a gung-ho element. To compare like with like is unfair.
I do always watch displays closely – no matter whos flying it.
I noticed the same skills mentioned above performed by Guy Bancroft Wilson, Hoof Proudfoot, Bill Murton etc on many occasions. Little gung-no or bravado (except perhaps in the case of Don Bullock in the Invader)
I’m making no comparisons, just that too many irreplaceable aircaft have met the ground with the loss of equally irreplaceable human beings through low aerobatics.
Point taken about the original thread, its not what we were discussing, just something I feel strongly about.
Originally posted by Steve 964
Have any of you ever seen a recording of the Biggin Hill Air Fair 1982 as televised back then?
There are some great performers on this recording including many that are sadly no longer with us,but the reason I have posted this is to comment on the Hanna/MH434 performance.
The aircraft was still in the Sir Adrian Swire livery at this time and was the last Biggin Hill performance before MH434 was sold to OFMC.
This is a display the like of which I haven’t seen for many years,for instance imagine MH434 being banked round the trees on knife edge with only one wing visible above the trees,and the flying full length of runway with less than diameter of prop beneath the aircraft, – can’t get lower without landing!!
Wondered if anyone wanted to see it,I could run a copy so as to protect my copy ,and it could be passed round in similar fashion to the camera.
By the way you could also see the 83 show as well.
Havent seen that clip but have some old super 8s of my Dads from early ’70s airshows showing Mister Hanna doing crazy things with MH434.
Ive also seen a video of a P38 rolling at very low level, and a P63 not pulling out of a dive after a loop, a RR Spitfire doing the same , recall an A26 barrel rolling……
Low level aeros in priceless warbirds…….. come on guys
No wonder insurance premiums are through the roof and there are so many restrictions and hinderances to getting/keeping old timers flying.
Originally posted by robbelc
Would love to see XE601 fly again. There are some great RAE/A&AEE color schemes( a nice geen and white one) that would look great on her.
Or can we have a two seater in the early 70’s training scheme of grey with dayglow stripes on the nose?
Hunters rule!
That green/white one you are referring to is presumably the unique T12 originally kitted out with TSR2 avionics and then went on to be the first FBW test bed. As a 2 seater that definitely would NOT be a good scheme for XE601! The current ripple scheme would be fine thanks!
Having said that, there are several 2 seaters that would look very good in the old schemes, my favouirite would have to be ’70s era red/white.
Originally posted by LesB
JASEDid they finally get the Avons then? Or just the hyd bits and legs?
How much different are the 101s from the 206s? Didnt think the 2 were compatible??
If they are confined to the dump at Llanbedr (same thing:p !) then yet again 2 unique machines are lost. Couldnt they have been flown somewhere for preservation and then robbed!?
Originally posted by 334_Pegasus
Would be nice to see her at Fairford….
Probably the most common Boscombe bird to turn up at shows!
Sure shes nice but theres so much more tasty stuff there that does’nt get around enough!!
Photo ship is still her main role – I was just identifying tasks ETPS would use it for.
The Aircraft Test and Evaluation Sqn (ATES) at Boscombe still use her for varying tasks, not the ETPS.I’m sure that she is borrowed frequently though for low speed/ tail dragger/ prop job testing. Out of the 3 in use with the then A&AEE, shes the sole survivor. No mention of a replacement yet!
Ah 141 SQN – thanks, like I said IIRC 85sqn , not gospel! , it was a loooong time ago.
Yes!! by all means back into her original TT20 target tug colours pleeeease!
Indian Navy Sea Hawks saw active service in various skirmishes with Pakistan, particularly ’65 & ’71. They were in front line service up until the early 1980s – replaced by Sea Harriers.
You guys got nothing better to do !?:D
You guys got nothing better to do !?:)
Thats a Cessna 650 Citation VI of the Chinese Government, oh yes and a bloody great hangar!