So Russia’s dream of developing its own 5th gen are dashed. Except that the jet is already developed and is entering production.

This was the senior stealth scientist who said that there was gaps where the vertical stabilizers connect to the fuselage. This scientist -doing an ActionJackson- wasn’t aware that the su 57 has all-moving vertical stabilizers. Which just goes to show what a fools errand doing an ActionJackson is.

In case you were curious about that IHS Janes hotlink. Here it is :

Janes360 – Page Not Found!
404 Error

^ I’m not convinced

Here’s just some more objective fact based reporting from Business Insider. This time, with a link to The Diplomat.

So these mainstream outlets are telling everyone that the su 57 has external weapons. Shameless disinformation peddling.

^ Here comes the super troll again. Where did you put the red crayons ? He just made a new batch of BS up. Just like the Business Insider hit piece. It’s a witch hunt through and through. The exact some condescending tone, the same junk accusations.

The Iranian fighter “has it better” now. Nice touch. No axe grinding childish behavior detected..

You couldn’t be that arrogant. So it has to be blatant trolling. You are trolling this thread if you have the gall to write that Internet enthusiasts like yourself have a superior grasp of stealth than Russia and the Sukhoi design bureau. Ironically the country who makes the best AIR defense systems in the world. Systems that NATO members would risk losing the F-35 to acquire.

Anyone who wasn’t so arrogant would question their own Internet pseudo knowledge of RCS (IRST & all) before they made such claims that you do about the su 57.

Some sage analysis from the western defense media on the su 57. And this is the kind of analysis that has convinced a large number of people that the su 57 isn’t stealth.

^ 4th gen jets are still the backbone of the US airforce. France just started on a 5th gen project while Russia’s is going into production.

It is funny watching the Americans pump China’s tires. I guess with their Russian engines, they are still the underdog.

Love it or hate it, you can’t ignore it. There is nothing quite like the su 57. Maybe deep down they know it’s better. Which is why it gets all the attention.

There you go yet again. You couldn’t be that arrogant. So it has to be blatant trolling. You are trolling this thread if you have the gall to write that Internet enthusiasts like yourself have a superior grasp of stealth than Russia and the Sukhoi design bureau. Ironically the country who makes the best AIR defense systems in the world. Systems that NATO members would risk losing the F-35 to acquire.

Anyone who wasn’t so arrogant would question their own Internet pseudo knowledge of RCS (IRST & all) before they made such claims that you do about the su 57.

@SpudmanWP

Looking at the Su-57 makes it self-evident and valid.

The delusions you internet fanboy stronkists have.. Is just astounding.

No US or NATO official has operated on anything other than the assumption that they are dealing with stealth competitors in Russia and China. Or did you think they refrained from starting F-22 production again because the su 57’s engine cowling was unpainted ? Lol.

But hey. I wont stop you from enjoying your fantasy world. I wish you’d just keep that fantasy world in F-16.net or something like that.