dark light

KGB

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 1,157 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Chinese air power thread 18 #2125710
    KGB
    Participant

    MOSCOW, December 22. /TASS/. Russia has sent the second batch of 10 Su-35 fighter jets (NATO reporting name: Flanker-E) to China under a contract signed back in 2015, a source familiar with Russia’s military and technical cooperation with foreign states told TASS on Friday.
    “Another batch of 10 aircraft has been sent to the customer. China will receive the remaining 10 aircraft in 2018,” the source said.
    The Federal Service for Military-Technical Cooperation has declined to comment on the report.

    Read also

    Russia’s advanced Sukhoi Su-35S fighter put into operation

    Earlier, a source close to military and technical cooperation told TASS that the first four fighter jets had been delivered in late 2016. In November 2016, Vladimir Drozhzhov, deputy director of the Federal Service of Military-Technical Cooperation, told TASS Russia had started fulfilling the first phase of its contract with China.

    Russia and China clinched a deal for 24 Su-35 fighter jets to the tune of at least $2 bln in November 2015. The contract also covers the ground equipment and spare engines.
    The Su-35 is a Russian-made multipurpose generation 4++ super-maneuverable fighter jet equipped with a phased array radar and steerable thrusters. It can develop a speed of up to 2,500 kilometers per hour and has a flying range of 3,400 kilometers and a combat radius close to 1,600 kilometers. The fighter jet is armed with a 30mm gun and has 12 hardpoints for carrying bombs and missiles.

    More:
    http://tass.com/defense/982446

    in reply to: What will Germany replace The Tornado with? #2125783
    KGB
    Participant

    Its a ballsy little jet. Flight performace wise its a Porsche while the F-35 is a Volkswagon Bug. But the “almost 5th gen” talk is utter nonsense.

    https://thumbs.gfycat.com/NeighboringVacantHumpbackwhale-max-1mb.gif

    @Tomcat
    yeah yeah. Non canard design will never out agile a canard design . Can see it with Typhoon vs F-15 as well

    in reply to: What will Germany replace The Tornado with? #2125901
    KGB
    Participant

    Economics isn’t Madrats thing..

    German people remember why their country has always required innovation to survive as a nation

    IMF said it estimated the German current account surplus — which measures the flow of goods, services and investments — to remain the world’s largest in 2017 at $285 billion, followed by China with roughly $190 billion and Japan with $170 billion.

    Germany is a founding member of the EU, the G8 and the G20, and was the world’s largest exporter from 2003 to 2008. In 2011 it remained the third largest exporter and third largest importer. Most of the country’s exports are in engineering, especially machinery, automobiles, chemical goods and metals.

    Germany is the most productive country in the world.

    in reply to: What will Germany replace The Tornado with? #2125910
    KGB
    Participant

    Fedayakin

    To pick a few things apart, where do you get this 30 year gap thing from?

    The fanboy underworld grants the Rafale special treatment. The French released these misleading RCS readings that were too good to be true (sub 1 meter squared) and ever since then, the Rafale has been bestowed this “almost 5th gen” status. The infighting about acquiring Rafales vs su 57’s in India has not helped either.

    The Rafale is probably the most agile non TVC jet out there and I fully support Germany in acquiring it. But this special status being granted to it is nonsense.

    in reply to: Amerika Bomber #2125911
    KGB
    Participant

    why are people so lazy as to not leave any description of the topic ? just a link ? don’t be lazy

    in reply to: What will Germany replace The Tornado with? #2125922
    KGB
    Participant

    Yes. Totally.

    Germany should buy European and should be expected to. The whole EU project is France and Germany then the rest. if I was Macron, I’d put on the pressure.

    in reply to: What will Germany replace The Tornado with? #2126170
    KGB
    Participant

    Aurel

    True. However I have my doubts this “project” will go anywhere. Soon enough our glorious leaders will realize that this will be pretty much a French aircraft with at best minor German contributions. But w/e.

    Buying the bloody F-35 to gain operational experience with stealth and then an extensive Typhoon MLU

    Europe is on a path to sovereignty and self leadership. Macron cannot stand Trump. The Trump election has finally woken Europe up. They just created a nato minus the USA.

    Avoiding the F-35 has a lot to do with this. I think the 5th gen Euro fighter is a go.

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon discussion and news 2015 #2126269
    KGB
    Participant

    The NATO 2% commitments goes back to at least 2006

    This was a stupid idea dreamed up by some academics at the Atlantic Council.

    Europe as a whole, lends a trillion dollars a year to the US government. (because the US has no money) Yet the Americans have the gall to claim that the EU isn’t paying its share in the defense shakedown.

    in reply to: Canadian Fighter Replacement #2126476
    KGB
    Participant

    @Ozair
    That’s quite the serving of red herrings you came up with there. Pictures and everything. You proved my point. The Rafale program has ZERO overhead. So how in the living hell could it cost more than the F-35 ?

    Again. If you think that the F-35 is easy to make and that the production will close the cost gap, then you are smoking something.

    The good news is Canada already manufacture a large number of components for the F-35 and for the approx.

    LOL This is exactly what killed the Raptor. Scattered production.

    At the heart of the ongoing weapons acquisition problem, retired military leaders and defense experts say, is a failure by the Pentagon and Congress to acknowledge at the outset the true cost and technical difficulties of building complex systems like the F-22.

    The military launches ambitious programs based on low-ball estimates by contractors, critics say. Eager to speed money to their home states, members of Congress allocate funding for these leading-edge defense programs, even before the technologies are developed and tested.
    When predictable engineering problems cause costs to explode, Congress typically reacts by cutting the flow of money. Production is then curtailed and the Pentagon searches for a lower-cost weapon. The vicious cycle begins again.

    “If everybody involved would be more realistic and didn’t lie about risk, technical difficulty and cost, we wouldn’t have these problems,” said Thomas P. Christie, a retired official who spent nearly 50 years working in Pentagon acquisitions. “We jump into these decisions, then get surprised about the outcome.”

    in reply to: Canadian Fighter Replacement #2126495
    KGB
    Participant

    Except economies of scale principals established for the last 250 years disagrees with you. The F-35 will hit 150+ a year compared to the Rafale looking at 15-18. Do you understand why making more of one thing at a time allows you to reduce the cost of manufacture?

    It is just hilarious if you think that the economies of scale principal is going to bridge the gap. The Rafale plant was turned on in 1992. Every little issue was worked out of it decades ago. Its probably paid for itself. Dassault can bang out a copy of the Rafale with their eyes closed.

    Compare that with this trans Atlantic , multi national monstrosity that is the JSF production program. Its going to take years to get the production right. If ever. (see the F-22)

    in reply to: Canadian Fighter Replacement #2126509
    KGB
    Participant

    ^ It does not matter who’s bids said what.

    An F-35 is never going to be cheaper than a Rafale.

    in reply to: Canadian Fighter Replacement #2126684
    KGB
    Participant

    @Y 20
    The anti-F-35 (which some of which are also the pro-rafale) group tend to argue the following

    1. If the F-35 quote is cheaper than the Rafale, then the F-35 quote is faulty. and either doesn’t contain the price for all the other stuff, is an outdated quote, or a bad quote all together
    2. If the Rafale quote is cheaper than F-35, it is accurate and fair. Totally ignores all the issues of the above quote.
    3. None of them have any idea of the F-18 quote.

    The F-35 is the most expensive weapons program of all time.

    There is no way in hell that an F-35 costs less than a Rafale. And it has nothing to do with add ons. Its like saying a top of the line flagship iPhone X or Samsung S8 is cheaper than an iPhone 5s or Samsung from 2014. Its just not possible.

    in reply to: Canadian Fighter Replacement #2126689
    KGB
    Participant

    Anything it better than the F-35.

    This is smart for Canada. They get a good used replacement. And no. They won’t end up costing more than new. Nor are they obsolete.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2126780
    KGB
    Participant

    ^ I’m not saying all will. We wont know that. But its a fair amount of countries that are operating 2 engines right now.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2126786
    KGB
    Participant

    Good thing is Mig is diversifying into civilian program in Military one they do not have any new product except for Mig-35/29K.

    The demise of Mig seems to be a trendy topic lately. Anything that survived the 90’s or was worth reviving after the 90’s , is probably here to stay. There are 26 countries with Mig 29’s in service. Brand new replacement Mig 35’s would be perfect for these countries. They wont have to change a thing. Just plug and play.

    It blows my mind that Sukhoi is not building a supersonic airliner. It would be the perfect niche market to keep them busy

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 1,157 total)