@Ozair Germany’s reluctance appears to be almost completely associated with their desire to foster a healthy domestic military industry and has nothing to do with Russian or US relations. Given the German Chief of Air Force has already advocated in favour of the F-35 I don’t see how you can make that baseless claim.
It has everything to do with US/Germany and greater US/EU politics. Russia has little to do with it. This is the first shot in Germany’s quest for independence. The Tornado happened to be expiring now and it is actually a bold political move for Germany to reject the obligatory client kit.
This is the new world order in the making. Germany and France are rightly going to run Europe.
Given the German Chief of Air Force has already advocated in favour of the F-35 I
yeah just like India. The US buttered up the air forces to vouch for the F 35
FBW said..Thankfully, most people realize Germany is no vassal of the US, and Germany goes it’s own way on defense matters.
Umm Germany is just now, starting to toy with the idea of sovereignty. The Trump election was all that it took. Obama ran Germany for 8 years. Hence the questionable immigration policy.
@Y 20
I’ve never thought of Haavarla as a Russia apologist in the slightest. I think he’s just saying it from a technical standpoint. The su 27 series has some inherent utility for these middle of the road countries.
The American posters just cant accept the story because its treason on the part of their govt.
Raptors are protecting the guys that did 9/11. And no. I don’t expect any American to be able to stomach this.
@JBoyl
Anyone who thinks American environmentalists will roll over and allow sonic booms over the U.S. just because the jet is built in America is crazy…If the environmental lobby hadn’t killed the Boeing SST, it would have had the same restrictions as the Concorde
When people are arriving in NY from London for less time than going across the states, the political pressure will mount. Every exec and their dog will be pissed that they cant fly fast over land. and it will be costing them money
The Serbs showed what an open panel does to the stealth of a stealth jet. Minor error you say but in a war zone, that’s a fatal mistake.
FBW wants you to use the ignore function so that he can go unchallenged. So its just him and the polite posters who go along to get along.
His game goes like this.. He posts overly technical and politely worded petty criticisms or questions about Russian equipment and in doing so, he drags polite or unwitting posters into agreeing with him and making little concessions. Then when someone calls him on it, he screams troll.
(like when he suggested that the serrated engine tips maybe/must not be for the su 57 b/c they weren’t good enough) “I guess Russia *could* have an LO Mig 35 in the works”
The N. Korea section is truly shocking, there was no sabre rattling until fat man started nuke testing and test firing missiles on provocative trajectories near his neighbors. Discounting the war of words between the two egotists, the actions that threaten to upend that region have been prompted by DPRK. Wonder if Bondarev would feel differently if Ukraine was test firing prototype ICBMs in the waters of the Black Sea? S. Korea and Japan have every reason to worry when Jong-Un has shown willingness provoke with attacks on S. Korean islands and ships.
This political commetary is worse than useless in a forum like this. Fat man and US agreed to wait 60 days before opening talks. Fat man did no tests for 60 days. What did Trump do in the meantime ? 3 aircraft carriers and B1 bomber runs.
Not worth commenting
man hours into the jet
The CPFH is about 14% above that of the F-16How much more code…
Why does that matter? That plays no part in the F-35’s cost to produce. If anything, it makes it less expensive since it has less specialized chips.Every F-35 has special coating..
Yes it does, which makes it more survivable & better able to do its job without extra help.Fighter pricing is all politics.
No it’s not. It’s all based on what it costs to create (in the US anyway) with a little profit thrown in.Its not like there hasn’t been high volumes of these other fighters.
Care to state when the Gripen, Rafale, Eurofighter, or Superhornet was produced at rates approaching that of the F-35 at FRP (100+ per year).Then you have to add that per jet to get a fair price
Why? I quoted the price that customers are paying for it. It’s not like the Rafale, Eurofighter, and Super Hornet’s dev is not already paid for.
@Spudman
There’s just no way. You say code doesn’t matter. The more code there is, the more processing power there needs to be. Look at the price of computers or phones or anything with processing power. The faster, top of the line stuff costs way more. It just has to. Bigger screens also.
@cherry ripe
Is Russia more of a threat to Finland nowadays than the USSR in the depths of the Cold War?
Its not even close. But the attitude of the western establishment to Russia is worse. And governments that aren’t in DC are weaker than ever. Finland will probably fall into line and buy whatever DC tells them to.
@halloweene
Its a Titanic level disaster. Or the shuttle Columbia. For one of the 1st operational F-35’s to be broad sided by an old Soviet missile is a historic disaster.
@Spud
Just answer one of the actual realities about the cost and the man hours into the jet.
Code. How much more code does the F-35 have compared to the Hornet ?
Coating. A Hornet just has paint. Every F-35 has special coating. It costs way more by the gallon. Its just a raw cost that no amount of accounting gimmicks can overcome.
Fighter pricing is all politics. The F-35 pricing is all poltics. Somehow, they are getting away with these numbers in the news. But those numbers aren’t meant for hardcore enthusiast consumption. Even volume wise. Its not like there hasn’t been high volumes of these other fighters.
On the development side, since the USG & Partners have already paid for the basic development,
Then you have to add that per jet to get a fair price compared to the Rafale or anything.
Given that the F-35 is cheaper than the Rafale & Eurofighter, close to the Gripen & Super Hornet,
Its not possible. Listen to what you just said.
Again. This is IPhone X for less money than a BlackBerry Torch in the case of the Eurofighter or Hornet.
The $80 mil number is the URF/REC Flyaway price. Every customer knows this
How could anyone seriously believe this ?
Treaty ally cost and export prices are 2 different animals. Unless the US govt is subsidizing the F-35 by 10’s of millions, there is no way that the cost is under 100 or anywhere near the cost of Rafale or Gripens.
How much more lines of code is there in the F-35 compared to a Rafale or Gripen ? The stealth coating ect. This is just not possible. This is like saying an iPhone X is costing slightly less than a Samsung S6. Its just not reality. And if sub 100 prices are kicking around, its because someone is subsidizing it.
They admitted that one of their aircraft was stuck by a bird.
well they shouldn’t have said anything.
@bring it on
Keeping it under wraps? What would the alternative be? Allowing the media to access something that is routine and a part and parcel of operating tactical aircraft in an air-force?
The IDF certainly doesn’t, and shouldn’t feel the need to talk/share any more information
The problem with your view is, that Israel admitted something happened. Why not just deny it all then ? Why did they tell anyone that an F-35 was damaged ? They brought it on themselves by disclosing anything at all.