dark light

KGB

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 301 through 315 (of 1,157 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Airbus: European Future Fighter Program #2148251
    KGB
    Participant

    (previous post didn’t contain a serious vulgarity but did trip the sensor)

    Anyway @ Mrmalay No. I don’t think Europe agrees with US 5-6 gen philosophy. Rumors of US 6gen say that the jet will be even slower and be even more reliant on stand off weapons/stealth.

    The Euro fighter is a rocket ship and the French jets are pretty spunky too. I think they want to go faster and be more manuverable along with better data/stealth ect.

    in reply to: Airbus: European Future Fighter Program #2148260
    KGB
    Participant

    @MigL

    That’s a load of ********. The central authority was generous with Eastern countries it controlled. They’d put in factories all over these countries. Some have turned into profitable corporations now. Tijikistans alluminum industry for example.

    As the saying goes in post Soviet Eastern europe. Along with “freedom” came poverty.

    in reply to: Airbus: European Future Fighter Program #2148830
    KGB
    Participant

    @Deino

    Well. People are talking about Europe’s fighters. Seems related to the topic for me. Arguments die out naturally. There’s no reason to step in.

    People seem to want to make every thread as boring and wooden as the Military aviation news thread. Yeah. That thread is always on topic. Never any swearing or argument. But just imagine the whole forum was like that thread. It would be tragically boring.

    in reply to: The 'JUST A NICE PIC…' thread #2148881
    KGB
    Participant

    ^where is that ? (the ladies+jet)

    in reply to: Maneuverability of multirole fighters #2148884
    KGB
    Participant

    http://i.imgur.com/oSAMs8r.gif

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2149425
    KGB
    Participant

    @stealthflanker @FBW

    i wonder why we need to compare MiG-29 and Su-27 when they serve different Hi-Lo mix.

    They really weren’t.

    Here on Wings of Russia, they use those exact words. The USSR was looking to replicate the US’s Hi-Lo mix. And Mig was tasked with countering the F 16

    Should start at the right time 6:45

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2149484
    KGB
    Participant

    @Vnomad

    Most today’s users inherited their Mig-29 fleets form the 80ies or early 90ies.

    And they elected to keep using them. They did not sell them off or scrap them.

    Isn’t it enough to raise some question about Mig-29’s future?

    I see it as the opposite. Many of the biggest users are still in good relations with Russia. (India, Belarus, Kazakistan, Iran, Iraq ect)

    With the Mig 35, they can purchase a brand new jet with 5th gen avionics, thrust vectoring and the latest tech, that will fit seamlessly into their existing simulation, maintenance and hangar programs. Pilots will already be versed in the jet as well.

    So many of these countries will eventually need replacement fighters and I just don’t see many of them being dumb enough to start from rock bottom with an entirely different brand.

    Oh and this.

    Like your underline message is that the Flanker concept and design also is flawed..
    And the [B]the only effective and correct judge of things is which side produced and exported the most.

    [/B]

    The Shah of Iran was basically forced to buy 60 Tomcats so yeah. That certainly is a flaw in the theory

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2149490
    KGB
    Participant

    @Vnomad

    Ukraine, Uzbekistan & Kazakhstan inherited their MiGs from the Soviet Union. The state of Korean aircraft is open to question.

    They’re not dying on the vine but buyers haven’t exactly been lining up for more, including the ones who already operate them (like Malaysia & India). Ironically, its prospects on the export market have gouged away by its successful larger cousins (Su-27 & Su-30s). The Su-30 probably has a better claim to being the F-16 of the non-Western world, despite its size.

    Poland is also a former Soviet yet you mentioned it in your own post. So I wasn’t and still aren’t sure what exactly you were getting at. I was just making the point that there is a lot of Mig 29’s currently in service. Whether they were exported to those air forces or not.

    Many of these nations are developing and some are even frontier markets. They aren’t developed enough to have a complete air force. So they covered their main needs first. ie full size front line fighters.

    @FWB

    No, the F-15 variants (ordered + delivered) exceed that of the MiG-29 exports

    I highly doubt that but I don’t feel like looking it up. Is this contingent on the red herring about X Soveit states not counting as export markets ?

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2149756
    KGB
    Participant

    @ Vnomad

    Most of which retain MiG-29s in limited quantities of which an even smaller number are actually airworthy. Not exactly a fitting analogue to the F-16. Outside of the former-Soviet states, the only major operators are India & Poland

    Ukraine has 80 Mig 29’s. Uzbekistan has 60. Iran has 40. Kzakistan has 40. North Korea 31. Burma 31

    There are tons of them out there operating. The theory going around that they are dying on the vine and that there will never be a market for the Mig 35 is just bunk. Most of these air forces will do the practical thing and buy a replacement that all of their infrastructure is built around.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2150044
    KGB
    Participant

    @Vnomad

    There are 26 flags currently operating Mig 29’s.

    There are 9 flags operating Mirage 2000’s

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2150130
    KGB
    Participant

    @ TR1

    Works well for constant disinformation though.

    Military jets, whether its fighter, transport, rotary or anything, are famous for being way late and over budget ect. Happened with the Raptor and the F 35 too. Still happening with the F 35 in fact. And throughout the whole process, air forces and the manufacturer, in the US , EU or Russia, lead the public on about specifics, time tables ect.

    To say that the Pak Fa is some special case and that there’s a real injustice here , with Cold War 2.0 buzzwords and all, (disinformation) is just nonsense.

    Russia must be bombing hospitals intentionally in Syria, because they served up some “disinformation”about when the Pak Fa was supposed to be in service.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2150135
    KGB
    Participant

    the MiG-29 really doesn’t offer anything the Flanker can’t do. Yet it doesn’t seem to be much cheaper to operate, which makes its existence even more questionable in today’s environment.

    Then there is MiG-35. I am still unsure how that jet will fit in with the airforce. Still not sure how it fits in.

    And according to this guy, its already a failure !

    I’m suggesting just that, if Mig-29 would have been designed from day zero with different and more flexible performances in mind, and possibly single engined, it could have offered some real cost savings

    Wow does this thread ever attract the bottom of the barrel of the armchair economists and armchair air wing market consultants.

    Why oh why do so many western biased commenters have such a beef with the Mig 29/35 ? The very existence of this jet seems to perturb them. They’ve been heralding the end of this jet before it even made the comeback.

    The Mig 29/35 is simply the F-16 of the non US controlled world. Always has been. Always will be.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2151020
    KGB
    Participant

    Originally came here to post this. Since there is constant skepticism about Russia’s order books. “who buyin the Mig 35 brah ? Nobody”

    Russia’s Rosoboronexport state arms exporter at the end of the year will exceed 50 percent, Rosoboronexport said Wednesday citing Director General Alexander Mikheev.

    Over the past five years, the share of aircraft supplies in the total exports of the company was about 45 percent.

    “We note a surge in demand for combat jets. Its share in the total volume of Rosoboronexport supplies will exceed 50 percent in 2017. At the same time, the company successfully delivers products to other branches of armed forces as well.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2151021
    KGB
    Participant

    Do we really have to read that garbage from MadRat here ?

    The whole point of the su 35, su 34 and the su 57 is that they are all built around the T10 platform. Yet here we have an expert saying

    “Imagine if the Russians had actually built aircraft in series production that supported one another’s supply chains.

    Then we have this zinger

    The crumbling of the Soviet era war machine continues with every passing day.

    Not even worth a response. Russia has been bringing in new Corvettes, subs and fighter jets as just finished winning a war in the middle east. Resurgent demand from a winning proxy in Libya, new deals with Egypt and Iraq. New deals with gulf countries. But hey Russia is crumbling.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2152823
    KGB
    Participant

    @Seperonx

    You are 100% right. China sat back like a b*tch even at the most diplomatically and militarily intense moments of this war. There could have been points in this war where all could have been lost. And Russia sure could have used some diplomatic backup. But nope. China cowered in the corner. Now they are waltzing out to pocket the loot.

    Iran already shafted Russia on Sukhoi Superjets. Even though Russia saved their ass too.
    (dead)
    http://ifpnews.com/exclusive/iran-inks-deal-russia-buy-several-sukhoi-100-jets-report/

Viewing 15 posts - 301 through 315 (of 1,157 total)