It’s already obvious that you don’t see anything. Neither recession in the previous two years, nor stagnation now. I remember such people as you, right before USSR died – they too didn’t see what’s coming…poor idiots.
Why do people insist on bringing up the Russian economy when they know so little about the subject..
The entire world economy is stagnating. Recession is a subjective term. (2 quarters of negative GDP growth) But Russia’s recession has no baring on its comparative health to any other economy. Russia had a business cycle recession. Nothing is more healthy and necessary for a capitalist economy than a business cycle recession.
Despite Russia’s business cycle recession, it still is the lowest debt country in the G20. It still is a net exporter with no net debt. It still has tons of forex and gold.
Canada on the other hand, had no recession at all. But guess what.. Canada is a trade deficit country and one of the most indebted governments and public in the western world. Canada has no gold and almost no army.
so whos better off ?
J-16s at SAC :p
They have the old school air brake.
http://bmpd.livejournal.com/2501988.html
Nice MiG-31 pics.
Not a fan of the green interior.
Why is Berkut dreaming?
The next thing you have to explain to us, how would you accommodate 20000L of INTERNAL fuel on this PakFa Interceptor?
Don’t you guys understand anything in how this work! You would basicly need to design a all new platform. You could make it PakFa’ish with different set of airfoils, but it would have to be 40-60% larger in size.
That people.. means nothing else than a new Interceptor Program! And you would need to heavily tweak the D30-F6 engines or get new engines. Cause no one here can say the Idz-30 engine has the right requirements to operate like the D-30-F6 engines does. Namely on prolonged AB settings.
After some time doing research on the D30-F6 engine. I can only conclude Aviadvigatel designed it with many different AB settings, and that on minimal Burner, it consume less fuel compared to other jet engines with same settings.
Also, we are talking about a low-bypass TurboFan engine. The PakFa engine is a Turbojet engine. There is a big difference here.
20k fuel is what it would take to get the same performance and perform the same mission scope as the Mig 31 ?
I think the mission scope and strategy could be augmented to suit the Pak Fa interceptor rather than just try and make the Pak fa do what the Mig 31 does.
PAK-FA will supercruise over Mach 2 just like MiG-31 and can carry large long range missiles like izd 810 so it can take the MiG-31 role. PAK-DP can just use variant of PAK-FA T-50.
Plus they could make an interceptor variant to better tailor it to the job. The more I think about it, the more I think that a Mig -31 replacement is a boon for the complex. They should just make a Pak Fa interceptor variant. The pod style engine design could allow for just bigger engines.
Isn’t engine size and fuel storage the only thing stopping the current Pak fa from having the same capability as the Mig 31 ?
Maybe they should dust off that Mig 1.44. It was originally intended to be a Mig 31 replacement of sorts. Or just get the J 20 back in the form of a production licence
Berkut is just dreaming.
Well, in reality considerably tighter, due to oil revenues and currency troubles, as well as general economic trends.
But I doubt we will see too big of an effect on the general platform procurement trends (tactical birds, etc), though the more “questionable” programs will certainly be pushed back some.
Its still about the same as 2014. The Ruble is divorced from oil and interest rates have normalized. The general economic trend is neutral to positive. Not down. I hate to have to nit pick at this but I just don’t think your assessment was entirely accurate.
These are bonds. Bonds carry Ruble currency risk
Playing a Surge in Russian Bonds (EMB,VWOB) By Todd Shriber | February 21, 2017 — 11:43 AM EST
http://www.investopedia.com/news/playing-surge-russian-bonds-embvwob/
Btw, there is actual patent from LM for the wide band RAM so they are far from being pixie dust.
There was the F117 crash in Serbia and the stealthy helicopter crash in Pakistan in 2011. Im forgetting one more but im just sayin, this stuff is getting around a bit
. There is no scenario where being easier to detect is an advantage.
There is a scenario where maintenance of stealth coatings could result in lethal downtime for an aircraft. For certain missions , Id take a strange shaped F117 if it meant that I was relying less on coatings and all of the maintenance headaches therein
…now it only takes a pixie dust RAM coatings to solve everything?
..
Exactly. This stuff is not magic.
But some people think that its as easy as putting a an extra coat of RAM on a hot spot.
In another thread recently, a poster assumed that a certain new 5th gen plane in development was as unstealthy as a 4th gen because it didnt have the “ram” yet
Is there an Israel Af thread or a Lockheed/US export threat ? (Not being snarky)
Dunno what to make out of it.
Neighter US media nor RT news want to give this strike much air time. Somewhat hush hush about this..I’m pretty sure Russia was informed of this attack in advanced and that they had worked out ROE together with Israeli.
One of the youtube vids show what could bits and peices of an S-200 missile.
Yes. It was all hugs recently when Netanyahu met with Putin in Moscow. During Moscow Visit, Netanyahu Received Special Gift From Putin — a Nearly 500-Year-Old Copy of Josephus’ The Jewish War.
This months winner
Not a new invention though..
It has been examined as early as WWI. And a few more times during the years. Even though there are some reports that pilots liked it etc I haven’t realy analyzed why it didn’t develop. I’m guessing it realy has to do with safely landing/takeoff. Personally I can only imagine it’s not safe at all.
\Dan
Nothing new under the sun.
GPS and computing power solves lots of old idea’s problems. I think that can be applied here.
If the Soviets could land a space shuttle with no pilot with that computing power, I think we can have computers taking care of all the variables in this design
The side arrays are still quite unnecessary, mostly useful for SAR but f-22 isn’t really A2G oriented. So it is easy to understand why they cut it to reduce cost
The IRST would be a good add on with the amount of stealth platform in the future
The point being though, that if money was not an issue, they would have kept it on.
The 2017 Russian Defense Budget is out, according to Janes it got a massive slash of almost 26% by comparison with 2016!
If so expect salami slice cuts across the board, it will be “interesting” to see the efect on the VVS.
2015 was a 21% increase.
2016 was a neutral.
So it is basically going to be the same as 2014, before the price of oil crashed.