^
You are confuse between 5th avionics and have nice modernized colour screens inside cockpit. the key is situational awareness.
Im no expert on that stuff. Does the su 35 have all the latest that the su 57 will have ? Probably not. But its probably more than just fancy color screens.
You do not get confuse with my words, the Su-35 S is a very very good aircraft, with positive things and other not so positive things, as EF-2000 or Rafale, or F-15 C, but all these aircrafts are 4th generation or if you like more 4 ++ generation, but miles away from F-35 and F-22, 5 th generation fighters.
I dunno about miles but of course they are better. But there isn’t that many F-35’s in service yet, they will be working the bugs out of them for the next few years , and the F-22 isn’t being modernized and isn’t being built anymore. The backbone of the force is still F-15 and F-16. And Russia is ahead in ground air defense capability at the moment with s400-500. With all of these things considered, Russia is comfortable with its fleet + a small amount of su 57’s for the next few years.
Its 3D because they can move at different angles, side to side. I don’t thing the F-22 does that.

^ It is indeed surprising to see how far along the carriers are yet they have so few of these jets. Which aren’t ideal for carriers anyway + the cloning process.
China should have had a better relationship with Russia by making it clear that they wont just buy 2 and copy carrier jets. They should have ordered a squad or 2 of mig 29 kubs right from the start. But Russia refused.
Maybe they still could. It would be a shame for the carrier program to fall behind because of the jets. But they have to do something.
Or it is simply a faked BS report written in the original report by Minnie Chan from SCMP,
could be. But even if the jets are good, they don’t have enough of them. They have to do something.
What is going on here with the J-20 program ?? Why is nobody keeping track of it ?
The Chinese brass say that the jet is in service. With what engines ? Surly this first batch isn’t fully stealth. They don’t have serrated engine nozzles.
How many are being built ?
Everyone is watching the su 57 at every turn and making theories about the state of the program yet the J-20 program just goes unnoticed. Everyone just nods their head when the Chinese make statements about the program.
Actionjackson said
(his comment suggesting collected data being analysed post mission) they performed analysis of recorded signal data from multiple, distributed receivers. After months of post mission data analysis were able to detect the transition of the source radar from search to lock mode
Look at this. He just takes a vague statement and makes a story about what happened out of whole cloth.
Again. The buzz in the media was that the su 57 deployment was irresponsible and risky. So So Vladimir Gutenev thought it was a good idea to run his mouth and exaggerate how important the Syria trip for the su 57’s was.
The prototypes went there to do this missile test. And so the brass could sit there with their big fancy war room and watch it on the big screens.

^
The buzz in the media , at the time that the su 57 prototypes were deployed to Syria, was that it was a stupid, irresponsible and risky thing to do.
So Vladimir Gutenev thought it was a good idea to run his mouth and exaggerate how important the Syria trip for the su 57’s was. I mean really..What F-35’s ? Had to be Israeli. Were there Raptors even deployed to Syria at that time ? We can find out. This was a load of BS from someone running their mouth.
But just like the deployment to Syria was over analyzed and spun, the words from this random Russian politician is being spun.
Su-57 6º generation?
I had to read many times these articles because i thought it was april fool day in Russia.
I think this man told this after drink 1 or 2 bottles of vodka.
The backbone of the US air force today is a 1976 airframe. But the su 57 can’t be a 6th gen :sleeping:
Military hardware is not consumer goods Rall.
This man tell with other words that they will build few Su-57 because with 4º generation fleet is enough for protect against 5 generation fleet from West.
Stop lies man; if you are going to have few numbers of SU-57 it is only for 2 reasons, or you do not have money for to buy big quantidy of this airplane, or the other option is that this airplane have problems and you do not want buy many until you can fix these problems on airplane.
This sentence of this man can be good for RT and Sputnik readers, for nobody more
You can spin it however you please Rall. Military Watch magazine is not a Russian publication.This was just about explaining what Gutenev meant with his comments. And it is diametrically the opposite of what Falcondude and Actionjackson were saying that he meant by his comments.
they will build few Su-57 because with 4º generation fleet is enough for protect against 5 generation fleet from West
At present the F-35 isn’t out there yet and has years to get the bugs out of it. And the F-22 is a hanger queen. And Russia is ahead of the US in ground air defense capability. Do they mean that in a squad vs squad fight, the su 35 could beat the F-22 ? No. They just mean that the sum of the US and Russia’s strengths and weaknesses, they are comfortable running with what they have + 12 su 57’s for now.
Remember the su 35 has supercruise, 5th gen avionics and 3D TVC
@panzerfeist1
Bragging about production of 5th gen aircraft no one seems to care about here that much. Everyone is more focused the features of the SU-57 than they are about the production.
Itys funny isn’t it ? Nobody cares that much about the J-20 either. How many are they really producing ? Nobody knows. What is the production program anyway ? Whos keeping track of it ?
The Chinese say its “in service”. And everyone just nods their heads.
When Su-57 took off they planed +200 for Russian air force,
Every single military program starts off with lofty statements like that. F-22 was no different.
50 before 2021, and then oil price drop plus sanctions, and India probable left program.
Russia could easily afford to build 50 before 2021. There is a big difference between not having “the money” and choosing not to allocate it. They changed the scope of the program for many different factors.
Russia would never put a government budget surplus or foreign exchange reserve goals ahead of the su 57 program if it really thought that it wasn’t near parity with the US now. Especially considering the showdown that Russia and the west are in.
BTW if you don’t believe me:
tass.com/defense/994572Money is problem.
There is nothing in that link that says anything about the su 57 program. Nothing at all. 12 aircraft was budgeted for at the start. Theres nothing new about the 12 aircraft.
The F-35 is just barely getting out in the field now and the F-22 is mostly a hanger queen. If the su 35 + s400 and the coming s500 wasn’t able to get them close enough to parity , they would find the money for the su 57 if they really needed it. They just would. Is Russia at parity sentimentally ? No. Russia would have to build 150 su 57’s soon to get to sentimental parity.
Show me one economic data point that suggests they couldn’t get money for the su 57 program if they really wanted to ?
Russian FinMin expects budget surplus, not deficit, for 2018
MOSCOW, May 11 (Reuters) – The Russian Finance Ministry expects the budget for 2018 to run a surplus, not a deficit, for the first time since 2011 thanks to rising oil prices, a draft law on the budget showed late on Thursday.
Russian inflation to hit record low this year before 2018 rebound …
https://www.reuters.com/…russia…/russian-inflation-to-hit-record-low-this-year-before…
Not a fan of photography of jets with landing gear in mid stroke.its tacky
So we have an article now from Military Watch magazine that references the Vladimir Gutenev statement and obviously , like we already knew, the interpretation by the sophists Falcondude and Actionjackson is just that.
But they will still spin it. I’ll get back to that.
http://militarywatchmagazine.com/article/70750
Quoted from the article:
– The Su-57 program is very much a sixth generation air superiority fighter program, one which at early stages can serve as a high end fifth generation aircraft comparable to the American Raptor – as in the case of the 12 initial production production variants ordered by the Air Force, but ultimately the Russian military began the program with a greater end in mind.
-The end goal of the Su-57 is to be able to go head to head with the American sixth generation air superiority fighter currently being developed to replace the Raptor under the F/A-XX next generation air dominance fighter.
-Further enhancements to electronic warfare capabilities and radar jamming, stealth, next generation engines, the use of hypersonic and energy weapons and the deployment of defensive missile blinding lasers are among the systems which a completed sixth generation variant of the Su-57 is likely to deploy.
-Unlike the Su-57, the F-22 is a purely fifth generation fighter and has seen little invested in its modernization.
-Russia doesn’t need a massive Su-57 fifth generation fleet to protect itself or maintain parity with the Western Bloc at present, but it will in the not too distant future have considerable need for a sixth generation air superiority fighter capable of matching the upcoming American platform.
Now. Here is how the sophists will spin it.
The article also says this:
Russia’s cutting edge air defense network and its heavily upgraded ‘4++’ generation fighter fleet, backed up by advanced electronic warfare technologies which are reportedly heavily relied on to compensate for a lack of stealth, are more than enough to retain sufficient parity with the Western Bloc that they will be cautious about challenging the Russian fleet openly – in Syria, Eastern Europe, the Pacific or elsewhere.
^They will say that the “lack of stealth” that is written here, INCLUDES the coming batch of 12 su 57’s. But it does not. Because before that sentence, it says this : “It is first critical to understand that at present Russia has no urgent need for the Su-57”. So no. The “lack of stealth, does not imply that the Russian force will lack stealth with the first batch of su 57’s. Even though that’s what Falcondue and Action Jackson will say.
Another report from about the same time in China Defense News [中国国防报] did not mention the J-18 by name, but appeared in this official military newspaper under the headline “How Will China Develop a Short Takeoff Fighter?” This piece makes several interesting assertions, including that China has been working on V/STOL technology since the 1960s and also that Beijing apparently acquired a Russian V/STOL Yak-141 prototype fighter to tinker with and study back in 1994. The author touts the qualities of the Russian aircraft and further suggest that China has “many times” proposed joint research and production of that fighter with Moscow. In the end, this analysis concludes that V/STOL fighters flying off of amphibious attack ships are the logical choice for any navy’s second line of defense (behind the big decks).
^IMO China should have just bought Mig 29kubs right from the start instead of home building su 33’s
The FC 31 was always a carrier bound jet. China always lies to keep the pundits off balance. Why else would an expensive jet like that be developed ? It wasn’t developed just as a side project for export.
China is working on a new fighter jet for aircraft carriers to replace its J-15s
Experts say the task has become more pressing after a series of mechanical failures and crashes, as Beijing pursues global navy ambitions.
The J-15 was based on a prototype of the fourth-generation Russian Sukhoi Su-33 twin-engined air superiority fighter, a design that is more than 30 years old. It was developed by Shenyang Aircraft Corporation, a unit of state-owned Aviation Industry Corporation of China.
With a maximum take-off weight of 33 tonnes, the aircraft is the heaviest active carrier-based fighter jet in the world, used on China’s first aircraft carrier, the Liaoning
China needs to develop the new fighter jet as it plans to create at least four aircraft carrier groups to fulfil its global navy ambitions and defend its growing overseas interests, Beijing-based naval expert Li Jie said.
“In order to improve the combat effectiveness of the Chinese aircraft carrier strike groups, it is necessary to develop a new carrier-based fighter,” Li said, adding that the FC-31 stealth fighter could be used as a model to replace the J-15.
China’s FC-31 is a newer generation stealth fighter that made its first flight in 2012, and is smaller and lighter than the J-15.
Lieutenant General Zhang Honghe, deputy head of the PLA Air Force, also told the South China Morning Post that a “new carrier-based fighter to replace the J-15” was being developed.
The need to develop a new fighter jet has become more pressing after a series of “unpardonable mechanical failures” that have killed one top PLA pilot and injured another.
Two sources close to the military told the Post there had been at least four crashes involving the J-15, although only two of them have been reported by state media.
“The J-15 is a problematic aircraft – its unstable flight control system was the key factor behind the two fatal accidents two years ago,” one of the sources said.
Pilot Zhang Chao, 29, died in a crash in April 2016 as he tried to save his J-15 fighter jet, whose flight control system was breaking down during a mock landing on an aircraft carrier, according to state media reports.
Three weeks later, his colleague Cao Xianjian, believed to be in his 40s, was seriously injured as he tried to deal with the same problem on a J-15. It took him more than a year to recover.
All J-15s were grounded for three months after the crashes, which undermined morale in the air force and navy. The navy called for an investigation after Zhang’s death, the sources said.
“But the aviation experts at first refused to acknowledge that the J-15 has design problems,” one of the sources said. “They only agreed there were problems after Cao encountered the same trouble.”
‘At least 12 crew members killed’ in Chinese military plane crash
Many of China’s home-grown fighter jets have had problems with their engines, aircraft design and modifications. But a PLA Navy veteran said that instead of carrying out more test flights, pilots were pushed to fly the warplanes, even though they had faults.
“Of course it’s impossible to prevent any accident from ever happening during training. But unlike their counterparts in Western countries, Chinese air force pilots are asked to work around these mechanical errors,” the navy veteran said.
Not a single article has been written about this. Because there is nothing here. You and Action Jackson are making propaganda out of whole cloth.
You have started a small propaganda brush fire. Tyler Rogoway might find this thread and make an article about it.
Syria has been lobbing S-200’s at Israeli jets for 30 years. And never once been successful.
But in this one window of time, after Russian and Syrian air defences were synced up and at a time when Russia was trying to establish to Israel, that the balance of power has changed over Syrian air space , one F-16i was completely downed & one F-15 was damaged and something happened to an F-35.