Except it isn’t more. The oscillation occurs for light loaded aircraft only. On operations how frequently will we see light loaded airframes take off from a carrier? The answer for you given your preference to dodge actually answering a question is that we won’t. Light loaded airframes likely comprise less than 2% of all cat launches and to get around the issue there is the really easy fix of just loading the jet a bit heavier…
I also expect this will be a non issue for EM catapults given the acceleration profile will be a lot smoother and F-35C will likely be launched from a lot more EM catapults over its life that steam.
Do you have a hard number on that from a reputable source ? I don’t think they load jets up for certain training ops. But maybe they will load them up just to get rid of the problem. Thats a lot of extra work and dead wight to pack around for nothing.
The big delay was years ago, the program has been running more or less on time and on budget since then. (and lets face it, delays are more or less par for the course in aerospace projects. Even the Gripen NG is running well behind its original schedule, as is the PAK FA, etc.)
Nobody disputes that the program has had issues, but such is the level of scrutiny that it draws that every little glitch is blown out of proportion by clueless critics in the media. We have seen that happen over and over again already and I expect this to be the same thing.
Except that with the F 35, most of the criticism is coming from people close to the program. This doesn’t always happen.
Again, what do American states have to do with Russian aircraft in Syria?
California’s economic prowess gives it no more say in the situation in Syria. Utterly irrelevant.
I come here to try and get away from economics. I won’t reply to him again.
But I will just say that, the critics of Russian aircraft or operations always dredge up the Russian economy.
In all of the Russian aircraft threads, there will be some discussion about the aircraft. Order numbers, development ect. And some people can’t help themselves but to post something dismissive about the Russian economy even when it is not true. “RuAf is ordering x amount of su 34’s” “but the Russian economy is so bad that they will end up cutting it down to X” “they are developing the Pak Fa.. But the Russian economy..” “the Kuznetzov is finished its operations in Syria and is headed home.. Because the Russian economy..”
As someone who specializes in economics.. It is very hard to just bite the tongue sometimes.
Calm down?
It is Russia and its media that take to hyperventilating over imaginary threats. Witness the ballistic missile defense silliness…
So it is up to you to decide what Russia views as a threat ?
Russia views it as a threat whether you like it or not.
Russia views an ISIS controlled Syria as a threat.
In a pragmatically realistic view, yes Poland has the right to choose who it aligns with and to install any type of instalation it sees fit inside its territory.
double post
Poland is a sovereign state. They have every right to do what they want on their territory that Russia does.
Not relevant to the topic.
It isn’t so much that the Russian economy doesn’t do anything but oil and gas, its just that it doesn’t do any of those things very well.
Imagine a store that sells lots of things, but only makes money on a couple…
I am sure getting sick of having to talk about the Russian economy any time Russia’s military operations or military equipment is talked about.
China stealth bomber. Is there a concept thread ?
.jpg)
Artists rendering of the J-Berkut
There was just no way that China would have opted for the Berkut over the Mig 1.44
.jpg)
http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/6839/the-navys-f-35c-has-a-major-nose-gear-problem
More than a decade after the Lockheed Martin F-35 began flight testing, the Navy’s catapult launch and barrier recovery (CATOBAR) variant, the F-35C, remains mired with teething issues. Now, one problem appears to be more debilitating than previously realized, and it’s rearing its head at a critical phase of flight for any Navy fighter—the catapult launch.
The issue occurs when a lightly loaded F-35C’s landing gear nose strut is compressed while the jet throttles up, right before launch. As the catapult fires and the hold back bar is released, the jet is rapidly pulled forward, during which time the strut oscillates violently up and down. The bouncing continues as the aircraft proceeds down the catapult track at increasing speed.
The problem was vividly demonstrated among a group of F-35C’s participating in the type’s third set of sea trials aboard the USS George Washington last summer, giving pilots a wild and potentially dangerous ride down the deck.
The airplane seems to be able to take the hammering, but the pilot sitting over the strut can be severely affected by the ordeal. The movement sends their already-heavy advanced helmet mounted display and oxygen mask flopping up and down, applying pressure to the pilot’s jaw. The erratic oscillations also keep the pilot from being able to read critical info on their helmet-mounted display, an anomaly that can persist sometime after the jet has departed the deck and entered smooth air.
So.. my post about the F 35 specifically got drowned out by Mirage fuel tank talk ?
The point isn’t that it is somehow bad that Russia has lots of oil. The issue is that it doesn’t really have much of anything else.
They have pipeline interests in Syria and the middle east
Russian exports in 2015:
[IMG]https://s28.postimg.org/a43gsn0wt/Country_Analysis/IMG]
Russian imports in 2015:
Just curious.. Do people think that having lots of oil is some sort of political or economic home-run for countries ? And somehow Russia doesn’t count b/c it has lots of oil ?
Venezuela Has World’s Largest Oil Reserves – 24/7 Wall St.
247wallst.com/energy-economy/2016/08/…/venezuela-has-worlds-largest-oil-reserves…
Russia does have pipeline interests in Syria that will effect them locally
Besides, Russia’s days as a leader in commercial space launch are numbered.
Russia is a pipeline power. That’s part of the reason why they are in Syria.
Why look up some data if you two can bicker, instead?
[img]http://fromtone.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/GDP-by-sector.j/img]
And this was with oil at $100 per barrel. So even if production is around the same, the value of the oil sector has shrunk considerably in this pie chart.
Russia’s exports consist almost entirely of raw materials, mostly oil and gas. Fact.
Being a leader in a couple niche areas doesn’t matter much if your whole economy depends on oil, gas, and mining.
Besides, Russia’s days as a leader in commercial space launch are numbered.
The funniest thing about these “oil economy” allegations is that the whole US economic “recovery” was built on oil and the US was the new energy super power. And oil was supposed to bail out the western nanny states.
Pre 2014

USA, the new oil superpower – Value Research: The Complete Guide …
https://www.valueresearchonline.com/story/h2_storyview.asp?str=26811
Independent Scotland’s bounty – the biggest oil fields in the UK North …
http://www.offshore-technology.com/…/featuredeep-pockets—the-biggest-offshore-oil-fiel…
Post 2014
US Shale Oil to Write Down 40% of Oil Reserves – Breitbart
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/12/…/shale-oil-drillers-write-40-oil-reserves…
UK-Based Oil, Gas Sector Insolvencies Hit Record High
https://gefira.org/en/2017/01/03/uk-based-oil-gas-sector-insolvencies-hit-record-high/
Now the west is pretending that its oil revolution didn’t happen and its back to “Roosia is oil economy”