dark light

KGB

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 1,157 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: IRIAF F-14 flown by soviet pilots #2181867
    KGB
    Participant

    The post asks if Soviet pilots flew the F-14.

    It doesn’t ask if the Soviets acquired an F-14

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2181871
    KGB
    Participant

    Another Trump False Flag, Militants Claims of Chlorine Attack Turn out to be American Made… [ Editor’s note: The chemical shell being presented to the US as having been used by the Syrian Arab Army is part of a group VT sources say were manufactured in Ukraine to US specification but stupidly labeled by the Kiev regime in English with US specification.
    They were supplied through Turkey to al Qaeda in Idlib province, where they were loaded with chlorine gas. The US has contracts with arms companies in Romania, Bulgaria and Ukraine to supply ISIS, al Qaeda and the “moderate head choppers,” who in reality no longer exist, to support their captured Russian made multiple rocket launchers.
    Earlier Sarin attacks used American contracted materials from the National Reference Lab or “Lugar Lab” in Tbilisi, Georgia, delivered to terrorists by Ukrainian security forces and blamed on the Syrian Army…. read more: https://www.veteranstoday.c

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2183216
    KGB
    Participant

    Apparently Turkish authorities tried to get the pilot before the inevitable happened..

    #Syria // #Idlib // Turkish authorities are attempting to gain hold of the captured Russian pilot of the Su-25 shot down moments ago near saraqeb. Rebels are assaulting the pilot and pushing for a swift execution before external intervention.

    The conflict is down to a simmer but its still all out war in some areas. This is war. War will have casualties.

    KGB
    Participant

    what a beautiful mix that su 19 is. su 27 wing shape. Old school Mig tail, su 24 intakes and Mig 25 cockpit/nose.

    in reply to: German Navy rejects newest Frigate due to poor engineering #2002897
    KGB
    Participant

    @swerve

    what makes you sure that they wont scrap it ? Its non performing. Structural problems.

    in reply to: What will Germany replace The Tornado with? #2183983
    KGB
    Participant

    “Luftwaffe sources tell me, if Germany’s Air Force Chief says ‘F-35′ once again, he will likely be fired. Seems political leadership is still learning towards EU-solution (either nuke-capable Typhoon upgrade or new European jet,” German journalist and defense expert Christian Theils said in a January 30 tweet.

    This is awesome to watch. We are witnessing the rebirth of a new soverign German state

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2185230
    KGB
    Participant

    Visually, nothing. MiG-35 is a made up designation.

    The manufacturer decided name one of its product lines the Mig-35. So it is the Mig-35 now.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2185638
    KGB
    Participant

    Egypt ordered just when the name change/marketing happened. The Egyt ones are Mig 35’s. Custom order, but Mig 35’s.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2186381
    KGB
    Participant

    @stealthflakner

    The 3rd country or Russia itself need to find alternative financing scheme for the deal to proceed.

    They already have currency swap lines in place. This is a total puff piece meant to amp up US soft power where there is none. These sanctions are meant to stifle business between Russia and US Yes Man client states. Non alighned states are not effected

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2186382
    KGB
    Participant

    How will this affect Russian export in future when US is threatening 3rd country with sanction if they buy Russian defence products

    It wont effect it at all. World trade did indeed exist before the US dollar was invented. Ask the British empire.

    You are bringing too much politics into this thread with this question.

    KGB
    Participant

    @sandiago89

    I slightly disagree b/c this was the 3 to 3.5 gen era before the sleek and light F-16’s Mig 29’s and stuff came out. It was an era in flux. I mean the F-14 was too heavy to be considered a pure fighter. All of the jets in this timeframe were a blend of the fighter bomber role.

    Where as previously we had the small/light strap on rockets like the Migs and Sabers. Then after this era we kinda went back to that with the Mig 29’s, F-16’s su 27’s and F-15’s.

    KGB
    Participant

    Voodoo

    https://i.pinimg.com/originals/eb/a8/92/eba892de3619b4008e58ded9ef3de9d2.jpg

    KGB
    Participant

    yeah true.

    @Rat

    I dunno about the F-111 being in the same league as the F-14.

    KGB
    Participant

    Not a fair timeframe with the freaking F-14 counting but not the su 27 or Mig 29.

    yeah Ill take a Mig 21 over a F-14 mahaha not.

    Edit: I’ll take my chances with a Mig 25 Foxbat actually.

    But the question is still a setup.

    F-14 Tomcat
    Role
    Interceptor, air superiority and multirole combat aircraft

    National origin
    United States

    Manufacturer
    Grumman Aerospace Corporation

    Introduction
    22 September 1974

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2189022
    KGB
    Participant

    TR1 where’d that pic come from ? Keep em coming

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 1,157 total)