Sounds like a plan.
I see you show two landing lights. Avro’s drawing shows one (port only). I know PA474 has two these days but wondered whether the second was a later requirement … ?
Sounds like a plan.
I see you show two landing lights. Avro’s drawing shows one (port only). I know PA474 has two these days but wondered whether the second was a later requirement … ?
That’s superb. Can’t you offer them via a POD site … ?
That’s superb. Can’t you offer them via a POD site … ?
Lovely! When will you be publishing them? I really like your pencil drawings, Barry.
Lovely! When will you be publishing them? I really like your pencil drawings, Barry.
Two other queries!
On the Type 464 …
– landing light: port wing only? single light? did it retract?
– di-pole aerial for the standard beam approach: was it actually fitted to these? contemporary photos suggest not
thanks
Two other queries!
On the Type 464 …
– landing light: port wing only? single light? did it retract?
– di-pole aerial for the standard beam approach: was it actually fitted to these? contemporary photos suggest not
thanks
Brilliant info, thank you.
G
Thanks Eddie – but what’s the source? I need someone to say “my dad built them” or “I have the Avro drawings” or some such. (And yes – main difference would be engines and related systems, I think).
Also – This might seem an odd question, given the received wisdom – but new information prompts me to ask, were the 464s converted Type IIIs – or Type Is ? Anyone know *definitively* ? (I know that 617’s Grand Slams were Mk I Specials so maybe that causes confusion, but it would be good to nail the issue).
That’s really useful, thank you. I knew I’d read something similar somewhere but couldn’t relocate the info!
Yes, and they had to get it right because they had the last mine – no pressure. Sad that he went the way he did that autumn.