dark light

Sydhuey

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 26 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The Australian National… #791784
    Sydhuey
    Participant

    The Australian National Aviation Museum at Moorabbin Victoria have a complete Beaufighter Mk 21 and spares and the closed to public Museum at Camden NSW also have a complete Beaufighter Mk 21 and spares , have you thought of approaching them ? There aircraft will never run or fly but the engines may be fit for rebuild , swap some restored for static engines for these?

    in reply to: Will this be in its RAAF… #799570
    Sydhuey
    Participant

    Will this be in its RAAF scheme with 31 Sqn ie: TSS scheme Dark Slate Grey/Extra Dark Sea Grey over Sky, this aircraft (A19-144) was flown by the only Beaufighter ace in the Pacific Butch Gordon and scored one destroyed one damaged in this machine.

    This is a historically significant aircraft and should be in its original scheme.

    in reply to: Sorry mate , got the 14 Sqn… #799574
    Sydhuey
    Participant

    Historic article on 14 Sqn Marauders in Nov 15 issue of SAM and modelling article of the aircraft in Dec 15 issue of SAM

    in reply to: Three researches I know, 2… #799874
    Sydhuey
    Participant

    Three researches I know, 2 of which specialise on P-40’s (all 3 are published) have been head-butting a brick wall for years trying to break the myth of Desert schemed Kitty’s in Italy , I have seen quite a few photo’s most of which I can’t show of Kitty IV’s in a TLS scheme. Several books on P-40’s also talk about how after the P-40K new deliveries didn’t come in British colours anymore with reference to agreements with British purchasing commission just std factory colours for ease of delivery , then several pages later contradict themselves with a B&W photo of a Kitty IV with the text saying its desert scheme, when its TLS.
    I have seen pics of both sides of the subject Aircraft FX760 GA-? and its predecessor FX-740 and the tones and schemes match a TLS machine on both not a desert scheme .

    Another scheme myth broken recently was 14 Sqn Marauders  for years every one said they were in Desert scheme when in fact they were in TSS scheme when several colour photo’s were found to prove it.

    As I said it is hard to break the fixation that all 112 Sqn Shark mouthed Kittyhawks must be in Desert scheme, yes thru North Africa into Sicily, not in Italy in the close support role the Sqn’s of 239 wing the Desert scheme stood out like a sore thumb and the Middle Stone was quickly over painted with Dark Green on Kitty II and III and the Kitty IV delivered in OD over NG had Dark Earth applied in the std TLS pattern over the Olive Drab (OD was an official alternate to Dark Green), similar with many of the Mustangs in Italy being in OD and Ocean Grey 

    in reply to: No operational Kittyhawk IV… #799993
    Sydhuey
    Participant

    No operational Kittyhawk IV’s in Desert scheme , any in Desert scheme were at OTU’s in Egypt or South Africa.

    As I said earlier the fixation with desert scheme being the only possibility means interpretation of B&W photo’s gives you a reverse scheme as the RAF museum machine was done, Kittyhawks only had one official pattern with two primary schemes and the Dark Earth stayed in the same spot in both , on B&W photo’s in Desert schemes the Dark Colour is Dark Earth, in TLS schemes the Dark Colour is Olive Drab/Dark Green, when you understand the colour positions and compare it to an official pattern it is easy to pick the two schemes, and when you look at Pictures of Kitty IV’s in Italy it is pretty obvious they are not in Desert scheme.

    If this was a late model Spitfire in Europe in DG/DE as a “representative” scheme rather than the correct Green/Grey scheme it would have been howled down very quickly.

    in reply to: This is the thing its not a… #800051
    Sydhuey
    Participant

    This is the thing its not a Desert Kittyhawk, its supposed to represent a Kittyhawk IV in Italy in a different scheme.

    As I said the fixation with Kittyhawks with Sharks teeth in Desert schemes.

    Tomahawks , P-40E/F/K in Desert schemes , P-40L/M/N were in a version of TLS or just std US supplied OD over NG.

    in reply to: Yep I think its about 7-8. #800334
    Sydhuey
    Participant

    Yep I think its about 6-7.

    5 off the top of my head.

    P-40N

    Walrus

    Hudson

    Beaufort

    Anson

    in reply to: Yes that P-40E would be an… #801188
    Sydhuey
    Participant

    Yes that P-40E would be an excellent acquisition for the RAF museum , and it was an original RAF Kittyhawk 1, though not delivered, that in North African desert scheme would be outstanding.

    in reply to: I don't think the aircraft… #801205
    Sydhuey
    Participant

    I don’t think the aircraft is that bad, yes its only static display , just paint it in the right scheme, there is this fixation that all Shark Mouth Kitty’s must be in Desert scheme , if it was in its correct scheme it would actually be more of a talking point as it would break the myth of desert schemes.

    in reply to: Horrible layout, my computer… #801298
    Sydhuey
    Participant

    Horrible layout, my computer screen is 55 cm wide and the text takes up 13 cm if that’s not a waste of space, I don’t know what is!, At least make the text 1/2 the screen width. Search function useless (though has been said it will be looked into).
    ww2aircaft.net and even britmodeler.com have far superior layouts and actually have more information on historical aircraft , pity when the best two magazines on historic and military aircraft are Flypast and Airforces monthly, the forum isn’t even in the same class.

    in reply to: Valour In The Air – OUT NOW! #816584
    Sydhuey
    Participant

    Well I finally got this book to go with my other Air V.C. books as I thought the Art profiles would add nicely to the other publications , only to discover the book is riddled with errors .

    The most glaring was the narrative on Flt Lt Bill Newton that lists wrong aircraft, serials , codes and misidentifies photo’s, Bill Newton flew his 16 Mar 43 mission in A28-7 “H” (which took 4 months to repair after this mission) , not his personalised aircraft A28-15 “Q” which he only actually flew on missions twice because of repairs and servicing and he flew A28-3 “C” on his 18 Mar 43 mission when he was shot down.
    The RAAF operated 22 DB-7B Boston III’s diverted from a British order to the Dutch East Indies Navy, this was part on an order for 80 Boston’s for the Dutch East Indies Navy , 32 DB-7B’s as a rush delivery diverted from the British order and 48 purpose build DB-7C’s which never actually got to the NEI before it fell to the Japanese and were diverted to Russia.
    The “DU” Sqn code applied to 22 Sqn Boston’s was applied in Jul 43 , 4 months after Newton was shot down, prior to Jul 43 the Sqn’s aircraft ran single letter codes, the aircraft DU-Y he is credited with flying on the 18 Mar 43 mission was actually A28-18 which didn’t join the Sqn till well after Bill Newton was shot down .
    The photo of a supposed DB-7C is actually a USAAF A-20G, as I have said the artwork is misidentified and to top it off the photo of the formation of RAAF Boston’s actually shows A28-7 DU-H the machine Newton actually flew on the 16 Mar mission 6 months later and behind it is Newton’s personalise Aircraft A28-15 DU-Q.

    Arthur Scarf’s Blenheim has for years been misidentified as PT-F, but research that went into the Corgi model of this aircraft showed that the “PT” aircraft were Blenheim Fighters with 27 Sqn and 62 Sqn bombers were FX, the two units combined latter in the Malaya campaign because of losses well after Scarf was shot down.

    Hugh Malcolm’s Bisley (Blenheim V) may have had a black code letter not the normal red letter , a photo album recently found of 18 Sqn ops in North Africa and Italy show the initial new Bisley’s (Blenheim V) the Sqn took to North Africa had Black codes and latter replacement Bisley’s after the 04 Dec raid when Malcolm and most of the Sqn’s aircraft were lost from other units and depots had the more common red codes (and some grey ones too).

    The artwork of John Cruickshank’s Catalina shows it before its upgrade when it had the later search radar radome fitted above the cockpit and is missing the heat xfer exhaust’s to heat the wing leading edge both of which were fitted for the 17 Jul mission.

    Overall I was disappointed in the book with the amount of errors coming from a dedicated aviation publisher.

    in reply to: Whats happened to the RAF Museum A-20G? #923494
    Sydhuey
    Participant

    jeep man what’s W&R

    in reply to: Whats happened to the RAF Museum A-20G? #923819
    Sydhuey
    Participant

    Well I got onto the RAF Museum and got a reply, its still undergoing restoration and no completion or delivery date is confirmed yet. It will be awhile I think.

    in reply to: Whats happened to the RAF Museum A-20G? #930205
    Sydhuey
    Participant

    Have you got an Email Mike of some one that will answer not just there generic one ? thank.

    in reply to: Whats happened to the RAF Museum A-20G? #930221
    Sydhuey
    Participant

    Thanks Martin , I couldn’t find anything either, up till late 2012 there was various bits on a couple of sites and the RAF Museum had about its future arrival in their news updates then nothing. Last I saw the fuselage was just about done , though it had Stars and Bars with the red surrounding which was wrong, the red surround was well and truly gone by the time A-20G’s got to the Sqn’s in 1944. No mention of it on any site here in Oz either, its just gone quiet.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 26 total)