Starting in the display world – have a look at CAP 403 on the CAA web site, then if you want to continue, call Dave Evans at the CAA 01293 573510, who will give you a DA (display authorisation) number, send you a form and give you a list of DAE’s (Display Authorisation Examiners) in your area. Get in touch with the one of your choice and work up your display to a satisfactory level. Also, when you call Dave ask him for a copy of the latest Display Pilots Guide.
First aeroplanes – chose a machine that you are very current and competent on, make sure it has a market and make sure people want to see it. Rember that Harvards are expensive to operate, they are noisey and they don’t have too much airshow appeal – that’s why the Harvard Team went out of fashion in the early nineties. On the other hand, an interesting light aircraft such as a BA Swallow or Tipsy Junior may have a market at shows such as Old Warden. Extras and the like are good for village fates (sp?), and Warbirds are great at Duxford. There are already a lot of Piper CUbs on the circuit, but you ould try a Piper formation team with some mates.
Do remember that the DA has many levels, the basic of which is the flypast rating. If you want to go for aerobaics and/or formation as well, it’ll take a longer work up and the test will be more seaching. Remember also that at shows, people will expect you to display the aircraft appropriately – there’s no point in doing a flypast display in a Pitts, for example.
Dear All,
Many thanks for the replies – all are valid and all appreciated, particularly the nice ones!
As always, I’m short on time, but I’ll try to answer some of the questions and points.
Duxford clashes – I wish I knew the solution, it frustrates the **** out of me every year. I can’t go into details as we want to stay friends, but it would be advantageous to both of us to have displays on different days.
Spitfire – please see comments on the ‘shall we clip the wings’ thread.
Fury – the aircraft was only stored at Old Waden while Skysport were getting it back up to speed. Now it’s been fixed, it’s gone home to Belgium, via Duxford I think. It was (is?) for sale, but the price was way too high for the Collection.
Engineering time – is at a premium, even one day used on a non-essential project is one day too many. We only change what is necessary, not what is ‘nice’. With about 40 different aircraft to service and engineer and only 6 full-time engineers, I hope you can see the problem.
John Blake – retired several years ago, but as a special treat, continued for a few years at Old Warden. He retired because he had to, rather than any other reason – he is sorely missed.
Move the PA Poles – good idea, I’ll pass it on.
Move the radio aerial – we’re trying to, it’s on a promise to go at the moment.
Food – We’ve got the message and hopefully it’ll change this year. If it doesn’t then complain. But please do it writing, e-mail or otherwise, rather than to the staff on the day. The latter can’t do anything about it in the short term, but a well worded written complaint to the right person should hit the spot. (See web site for details: http://www.shutleworth.org or e-mail: [email]collection@shuttleworth.org[/email])
I can’t answer the title question as any aircraft is only worth what people will pay for it – in recent years, I’ve seen Spitfires go from £100K to £750K to £300K and back to nearly £1m. However, within the last five years I’ve heard that a new-build Hurricane would cost aound £750K, whereas a sympathetic restoration costs around £1.5M – it’s a question of labour costs and the additional cost of verifying the state of the original material.
I wasn’t privy to the decisions at the time when the Comet was grounded, but I do know that extensive efforts were made to keep her in the air. It was a question mainly of cost (there were no funds available to pay for storage) and finding an airfield close enough to Old Warden to make it worthwhile. In the event, it was decided that it would be better to have her at Old Warden for a few years where she could, at least, be seen.
Bear in mind also that at that time, the tailwheel was fitted, which would require a much longer runway than the skid. The Comet’s performance tables suggest a very short runway could be used; well within the length of Old Warden and Duxford. Common sense, and the fact that the landing problem is more getting her down rather than stopping short, leads to the requirement of a longer than minimum runway. Both Old Warden and Duxford are fine in that respect. However, with the skid fitted hard runways are out, although the tailwheel is kept on the shelf just in case.
The tailwheel was replaced with a skid some time ago – look carefully at trumpers post and pictures.
I can confirm that current plans at Shuttleworth are to fly the Comet and all of the other historic aircraft there. The question of whether to fly them or not is an emotional one with good arguments on both sides. Suffice to say that I suspect most of the Collection’s unique aircraft would not now be in existance had they not been restored to fly. The Blackburn 1912, the oldest flying British aircraft, is the best example. Had Richard Shuttleworth not recovered the wreck from a barn in the 1930’s, then it would not now be with us.
The Comet should fly again from Old Warden early in the 2005 season. With only 6 full time engineers, about 40 aircraft to look after and several major projects* this year, it was felt that the repairs to the Comet should wait until the runway had been smoothed over the winter of 2004/5.
*Recovering and restoring the Tutor, bringing the ANEC onto the register, recovering and repainting the Jungmann and recovering the Pup.
Cowling = Capot
I’ve still got mine, too, MOTF – I’ll bring it out this year and you can get that one as well……………!
Septic,
The reason nobody has ever written about the Collection pilots is that the philosophy of the place is to demonstrate the sight and sound of the machines, not the lucky chaps who fly them. Accordingly, no definitive list exists.
So if you really want to know who flew what, then you’ll have to first join the SVAS, then ask the Chief Engineer nicely if you can look at the aircraft logs, then go through each one page by page – and a facinating history it is too.
Here’s a few correction’s to the posts so far:
The Bill you speak of is Bill Wainright. He was a graduate of EPNER way before Andy S, so the latter wasn’t the first francofile. Bill left in 1990 to work for Airbus and eventually ended up as their CTP.
The first non-RAF trained pilot was Richard Shuttleworth – the founder – how could you leave him out?
Rob Millinship is the famous Aeromodeller and Pitts builder – he’s currently assisting Don Cashmore in the rebuild of Richard Granger’s Archyetc.
I agree with the hats comment, the guy to the left is Brian Lewis, the then display consultant, the Hatters are John Lewis, George Ellis and Andy Sephton
Bradburger: It’s Brian Skillicorn – an ex-helo TP and C130 driver.
Current pilot’s include: Willy Hackett, Chris Huckstep and Laurie Hilditch.
Of the curent pilots, three are non-test pilots, two of those are RAF trained, three are EPNER graduates, at least three are USNTPS graduates and the rest are graduates of ETPS.
PM me if you need more, Septic.
Airbedane.
Thanks for the kind words Philo, and the subtle edit……;)
Regarding the Islander – it would be a good addition to the fleet at Shuttleworth, but lets leave it for a few years, until it is nearer being an endangered species. Unfortunately, it’s not practical or cost efective to use such a machine for passenger rides. The costs of engineering to public transport standards, setting up an AOC to JAA standards, and licensing and manning the airfield, also to JAA standards, would blow any money made from the exercise and a lot more besides!
A
Neil,
If you put ‘Chipmunk’ or ‘Bulldog’ into the search part of the CAA database, it’ll give you a list of all the UK registered examples.
Good Luck,
A
I agree gbwez1, I read it some years ago and it helped a lot with my understanding of said engines.
If you can’t get it in the shops, most second hand aviation booksellers will put you on their wants list for a copy.
The following is a description of flying the LeRhone in the Shuttleworth Collection’s Sopwith Pup, taken from an article written for a comopetitor magazine……..
…….The LeRhone in the Pup is a nine-cylinder four-stroke motor aspirated by two valves in each cylinder head that are controlled by a single push/pull rod. The associated rocker has an exhaust valve at one end and an inlet at the other. The advantage of the single push rod system is lightness, which is essential for the rotary. The disadvantage is that it is impossible to overlap the exhaust and inlet valve timing, so performance is limited. Nevertheless, it does provide more than adequate power for the Pup.
All rotary engines are characterised by a hollow crankshaft which is attached to the airframe. Around it rotate the cylinders and crankcase, the propeller being attached to the latter. The result is a light weight power plant that does not require liquid cooling. But it can overheat on the ground with prolonged running and the gyroscopic precession of the rotating mass causes some not-insignificant problems for the pilot. The handling of the engine is also specific, any pilot errors in this area can quickly lead to power plant failure.
Fuel is transferred to the engine by air pressure generated by a cockpit hand pump and/or a Rotherham propeller pump. The latter is fitted in the main propeller slipstream on the port forward wing strut and the former is fixed on the right side of the cockpit. At the base of the cockpit hand pump is a small tap. Setting it perpendicular to the feed pipe isolates the pump, turning it parallel with the pipe allows the tank to be pressurised by the pilot, finding the correct position at about 45 degrees to the pipe vents the air system to atmosphere. The various positions of the tap can be used in flight to control tank over pressure, tank under pressure and to cure an air leak. After flight the tap is used to equalise tank pressure with ambient. There is also an air pressure gauge to monitor the fuel tank pressure – the maximum is 2.5 psi – and a Jones valve, which acts as an engineer adjustable pressure relief valve.
Oil flow to the engine is total loss; an on/off tap, which is inaccessible to the pilot, is fitted in the line under the tank. Oil flow is confirmed by an oil pulsator fitted to the starboard wall of the pilot’s cockpit. The oil meniscus moves slowly up and down in sympathy with engine rpm when the engine is running, thus confirming that oil flows. However, given the blue mist that can be readily seen emitting from the engine and the pleasant odour of castor oil in the cockpit, the pilot is in no doubt as to whether or not oil flows to his rotary! Nevertheless, the pulsator may have one use. Engine rpm can be checked by timing the rate of pulsation’s and comparing the result to a calibration chart. But, as with the oil flow, in practice, the pilot’s perception is as good an indication of engine rpm as any – in this case it is achieved by ear and airframe feel.
A fuel on/off tap is located in the fuel line forward on the lower left side of the cockpit. Fuel flow to the engine is pilot controlled by two coaxial levers fitted in a quadrant marked from 1 to 10 on the left cockpit wall. The larger, outboard lever, referred to as the blocktube or fuel/air lever, is directly connected to a blocktube carburettor, which, in turn is located on the pilot end of the extended hollow crankshaft. It controls airflow to the engine and to a certain extent fuel flow. The inboard, smaller lever, referred to as either the petrol lever, the fine adjustment lever or the tampier filter tap lever, directly controls fuel flow into the blocktube.
Contrary to popular opinion, rotary engines of the two lever type, such as fitted to the Pup, can be modulated over a range of rpm. In practice, this is about 700 to 1150 rpm on the ground, noted on the cockpit rpm gauge, which equates to about 50 to 100% available power respectively. The approximate lever positions for 700 rpm are 3.0 on the blocktube lever and 2.5 to 3.0 on the petrol lever. For 1150 rpm the approximate positions are 7.0 and 3.5 to 4.0 respectively. For a given blocktube position, if the petrol lever is set too far forward (too rich), or too far back (too lean) the engine will cut. A rich cut should clear in about 30 seconds, which is disastrous in low level flight; a lean cut can be cured in about 5 seconds. The trick for safe operation of a rotary is to know when the engine is running rich or weak and what to do about it if it is.
Finally, the engine suite is completed by a single ignition system with magneto on/off switch on the port cockpit wall and a ‘blip’ button on the control column, which cuts the ignition when depressed. Although the engine can be modulated by judicious use of the blip switch, it is not recommended as a primary engine control. The engine is ‘shock’ loaded every time the blip switch is pressed and continuous flight with the ignition switched off leads to oiled and fuel fouled plugs. Better to use the petrol lever to modulate the engine over it’s limited range, or if even less thrust is required, to shut the engine down completely by selecting the petrol lever to the fuel off position.
Now, lets apply the above briefing on operating a rotary engine to a sortie in the Pup.
Rotary engine time is a precious commodity and time between overhauls is measured in a few tens of hours. So, given the propensity to overheat on the ground and the wish not to waste the precious engine time, the Collection parks the rotary engined aircraft at the marshalling point of the runway in use prior to flight. Following strap in the pilot immediately carries out normal pre-take off vital actions as his hands will be full once the engine is running. The harness is secured, the flight controls checked and goggles are positioned and secured – the cockpit environment of the Pup is windy.
When settled and prepared, the pilot calls ready to start to the ground crew. The fuel is confirmed on, the ignition off and the engine levers are set closed. The groundcrew turn the engine oil on and confirm the same with the pilot. Each engine cylinder is then primed in turn by depressing the respective exhaust valve and injecting a measured amount of petrol by syringe. Meanwhile, the pilot pumps the fuel tank to a pressure of 2 to 2.5 psi and checks that the pressure is maintained. The groundcrew turn the engine over several revolutions to distribute and mix the fuel.
When the groundcrew call ready, the pilot sets the blocktube to about 3.0, rechecks fuel tank pressure, holds the control column fully back, calls ‘Contact’ and sets the ignition ON. The groundcrew confirm that there is one of their number holding the tail down and that chocks are in position.
The propeller is swung. If all has been set and primed properly, the engine bursts into life with it’s characteristic staccato crackle, the airframe twists in opposition to the torque and a cloud of blue smoke is carried quickly away in the slipstream. The pilot waits for the prime to burn off, then as the engine dies, he advances the petrol lever slowly towards the expected running position. This will vary according to ambient conditions, but will never be more than about 0.5 of a division from position 3.0. The engine is warmed at about 700 to 800 rpm for about 50 seconds as the lever positions for smooth running are essayed.
The engine will go from rich to lean and visa versa with a petrol lever movement of between one eighth to one quarter of an inch around position 3.0. A lean engine exhaust sounds light but rough, a rich exhaust note is harsh and heavy. With practice, the two states can be heard and felt through the airframe and if the pilot is diligent, they can be noted as a slight drop in rpm as the over rich or overlean state is reached. A rich cut is cured by closing the fuel lever and awaiting engine pick up – it should pickup within 30 seconds in the air, but it will stop and remain stopped on the ground. A lean cut is remedied by slightly advancing the petrol lever and the engine should pick up within a few seconds both on the ground and in the air.
At this point the pilot cannot fail to be impressed by the smoothness of the rotary when compared to radial engines. This is probably due to the big end, the largest mass in the engine, being stationary in the rotary engine, whereas it rotates in the radial.
After a 50 second warm-up, full power is tested. The blocktube lever is advanced to about position 7.0. As there is not enough fuel flow to maintain running, the engine lean cuts. The petrol lever is then advanced slowly until the engine ‘picks up’ and the lever position will be between 3.5 and 4.0. Again, the rich and lean positions are noted and this time the lever spread is about a quarter to a half an inch. The maximum rpm is noted, normally about 1050 rpm, but provided it is above 1000 rpm, the flight can go ahead. Time at high power is minimised, about 30 seconds is reasonable. Power is then reduced to minimum by first retarding the petrol lever to cause a lean cut, then resetting the blocktube to the slow running position, then resetting the petrol lever as appropriate.
Following a quick cockpit check and a confirmation that the fuel tank air pressure is sufficient to commit to flight, the chocks are waved away. The blip button is now used for the first time. As the low power setting of 700 rpm provides about 50% of maximum thrust and given that the machine has no brakes, when the chocks are removed, if engine power is not killed, the machine will jump forward and strike the ground crew. This is not an action which is conducive to good ground crew relations.
When the ground crew are clear the blip button is released and the blocktube advanced, followed by the same with the petrol lever, both being set to the positions for high power noted during the ground run. The aircraft accelerates briskly and the pilot must guide the machine between two limiting handling areas. If the tail is raised too quickly, even with full right rudder applied, gyroscopic precession will cause the machine to yaw about 30 degrees to the left. Following that, if right yaw is rapidly applied to control the situation, a ground propeller strike will certainly occur. Conversely, if the tail is kept on the ground too long, the aircraft will take to the air close to the stall with all the associated dangers. The tail must be lifted slowly and progressively as the aircraft accelerates.
Now, back to the engine. As airspeed increases, the propeller unloads and the engine rpm increases. Fuel arrives at the engine via the hollow crankshaft and is fed to the engine via tubes running along the sides of the cylinders. The increased centrifugal force produced by the accelerating engine will enrichen the mixture. Therefore, if the petrol lever is not retarded slightly on take off, the engine will suffer a rich cut and the pilot will be given immediate practice of an EFATO……………………….
That’s enough for one post; does that help you sayers02?
A.
WarbirdUK,
Sad to say, but I am who I am…….
Airbedane is the word used by daughter number 4 for aeroplanes, although she’s grown out of it now. I wanted to perpetuate the title and I couldn’t think of a better way, or a better handle. The only other alternative was ‘Spitsfires’ which was the name given to the beast by daughter number 3!
I’m glad MJ730 is now back in the air……but I wonder if the flaps are still asymmetric……….
A
It’s going off subject a little, but I didn’t realsise MJ730 was back in the UK – I thought only the wings were sent back after the mishap in the US. Is she still here?
A