dark light

stendec7

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 67 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Postwar British jet farm at Birlingham, UK #1070294
    stendec7
    Participant

    See Hawks are not “ten a penny”.

    Near Pershore, Worcestershire.

    Planemike

    I agree. I would give anything to have a Sea Hawk I could own and restore. To see these aircraft like this is heartbreaking. As someone said, at least give them a coating of WD-40,or put a cover over the cockpits to stop them milking up.
    We know how the A1 Lightning ended up…….

    in reply to: TSR2 thoughts #1071831
    stendec7
    Participant

    Is there any evidence of that or is it just heresay? It strikes me that TSR2 has exactly the wrong airframe to be used as a long range interceptor – small wing in comparison to the fuselage, it would have had a poor high level loiter performance. It was designed as a fast, low level strike aircraft – and not one with a huge range, it was a tactical aircraft.

    Similarly, it would not have been terrible agile for the same reason – pre fly by wire, the best dogfighters had a large wing area – the F-15 being the prime example.

    I don’t think it was the intention for it to be “agile”, or a “dogfighter” The thinking was that she could be pushed up towards the North Cape, from where, using her own radar in conjunction with GCI (eg Saxa Vord), she could launch AAMs against Soviet bombers heading south-west.
    Compared to the Lightning, with its very limited fuel capacity and outdated avionics, TSR-2s with tanker support could have fulfilled this role admirably.
    As indeed would have been the case whatever she might have been tasked with.

    in reply to: TSR2 thoughts #1073645
    stendec7
    Participant

    Not only would she have been years ahead of anything flying, in terms of the Tactical, Strike and Reconnaissance missions. There were also plans to utilise her great fuel load, hence loiter capacity, to act as a long-range interceptor to catch Soviet aircraft coming down from the North Cape
    TSR-2 was something special…killed by the enemy within. Has anything changed?

    in reply to: Historical Airfield Question #1060501
    stendec7
    Participant

    Shortage of airfields that could be be reactivated could probably be overcome as things stand right now. But err, what exactly have we got left to FLY from them?
    Madhouse Britain. Two plus two makes 17(ish).

    in reply to: Documentary … "The WatchTower" #1062410
    stendec7
    Participant

    There was also a drama called “Cries from a Watchtower,” a Play For Today, which was screened in 1979. But I don’t think it was aircraft related.

    in reply to: Vintage bomber flypast #1063555
    stendec7
    Participant

    TSR-2 Mk.1
    TSR-2 Mk.11
    TSR-2 Mk.111
    TSR-2 T.3

    and err, a Mk.1 Short Stirling chugging along behind.

    Sorted.

    I forgot to include, leading the formation, an Avro.730. It’s not THAT much of a fantasy either. But for a bunch of short-sighted, inept, criminally incompetent, utter and complete MORONS (no offence) And equally short-sighted, in the historical context, cretinous nonentities (no offence) THIS and so many greater glories would have been ours for the taking.
    We NEED a Churchill, we GET a Cameron. Nuff sed.

    in reply to: Not looking good – XM603. #1070865
    stendec7
    Participant

    Its future hasn’t been good for about 5 years. I’m surprised it’s still there. I’m not sure why the company didn’t break it up when the Nimrods were being broken up. Frankly it is an eyesore now and needs removing.

    What part of “Aircraft Preservation” are you having a problem with? The Canadian Halifax was an “eyesore” when she came out of the Norwegian Lake, now look at her. Dauntless dive bombers were “eyesores” when they came out of Lake Michigan, some of them are now FLYING.
    Thank heavens you’re not a doctor…

    in reply to: Shackleton XF708 IWM Duxford #1073344
    stendec7
    Participant

    Anyone got any internal shots of this lady? Much left inside?

    in reply to: Brunters turns into Lyneham #1074069
    stendec7
    Participant

    Or the money we spent on Nimrod MR4A ?

    Or the Air Marshall’s new curtains.

    in reply to: Brunters turns into Lyneham #1074390
    stendec7
    Participant

    I have been told one is going to Cosford at the end of the year no idea which.

    Better hurry. It might not be there by the end of the year. Nice to think of all those countless billions we send abroad isnt it?

    in reply to: Vintage bomber flypast #1074398
    stendec7
    Participant

    TSR-2 Mk.1
    TSR-2 Mk.11
    TSR-2 Mk.111
    TSR-2 T.3

    and err, a Mk.1 Short Stirling chugging along behind.

    Sorted.

    in reply to: Brunters turns into Lyneham #1074977
    stendec7
    Participant

    nah! they wont be scrapped, they will take all the good bits off the old aircraft and keep them, then put all the bads bits together from other aircraft so that they can fly. then they will sell them on to some 3rd world country. probably!!!!

    What, like the UK yo mean?

    in reply to: Javelin Views #1082935
    stendec7
    Participant

    Is the cow part of the original spec?

    Ahhhh, That’s what it is. I thought it was plug.

    in reply to: Glen Miller – Truth to be Revealed #1035010
    stendec7
    Participant

    Bruce Barrymore Halpenny wrote a long article on this in his Ghost Stations (Volume 3, I think it was) He then waxed very indignantly in Volume 4 when someone had the temerity to argue with him about it.
    As far as I’m concerned, Glen Miller was kidnapped by UFOs and taken to the Mother Ship on the dark side of the Moon(light) Serenade.

    in reply to: Duxford, Again…. #1056599
    stendec7
    Participant

    The Hawker Fury looks absolutely flawless.

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 67 total)