dark light

TonyA

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 10 posts - 121 through 130 (of 130 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Wonderfull Woburn (lots of pictures) #1607714
    TonyA
    Participant

    G-AGEG

    A couple of pictures of G-AGEG on finals

    Tony Andrews

    in reply to: Hawker Typhoon parts. #1554509
    TonyA
    Participant

    Typhoon

    Here is the patch with the signatures. Unfortunately the weather wasn’t great on Friday so the cockpit area was covered while I was there so the fuselage didn’t look as good as it could.

    in reply to: Hawker Typhoon parts. #1554841
    TonyA
    Participant

    Typhoon

    At Fairford this weekend

    in reply to: CockpitFest Newark #1795847
    TonyA
    Participant

    Cockpitfest

    Here’s the Hurricane … if I’ve attached it right

    Tony Andrews

    in reply to: Sea Fury Queries #1557603
    TonyA
    Participant

    Re-engined Furies

    It’s normally the R3350. Since this turns the opposite way to the Centaurus it is impossible to use the same propellor and would, presumably, be impossible expensive to poduce special 5-bladed units.

    Other option for racing is the corncob R4360 as fitted to Dreadnought and Furias.

    Tony Andrews

    in reply to: B-17 suffers gear collapse on landing roll #1558832
    TonyA
    Participant

    B-17 Gear Collapse

    From the illustrations referenced earlier it looks as if the gear, when fully down is, somewhere, in an overcentre position – i.e. weight on the gear either pushes the wheels backwards and pulls the main part of the retraction mechanism straight or causes it to hinge away from the retracted position and come up against a stop. Definitely, Once partially retracted the retraction mechanism is bending upwards, pulled by a relatively weak arm, the wheels are moving forwards to put a large upwards load on this (if on the ground!) and there is no way that the vertical strut will not fail or bend, followed by the rest of the gear collapsing.

    Tony

    in reply to: How can we improve Old Warden? #1560014
    TonyA
    Participant

    I too find very little to really gripe about at Old Warden – I don’t like the clashes with Duxford although that only normally interferes once per year so I normally still get to about 7 or 8 shows a year.

    I have found the shows to be a bit ‘samey’ in the last few years though that observation reflects
    1. continuous increase in the Collection and based aircraft allowing a full show from internal resources
    2. increased popularity of evening shows meaning they are now almost the same as the main displays
    3. CAA issues over irregular display pilots
    4. It’s the ‘same’ frequently unique group of aircraft so it’s not too boring to see them over and over again!!!!!

    Nevertheless the Collection has proved some truly memorable airshow moments over the years and continues to do so. I has also, in general, kept advancing despite several periods of financial problems.

    As has been mentioned earlier, I also particularly miss the more themed shows of the ’80s and early ’90s, particularly the June civil aircraft show that regularly featured interesting visiting light aircraft – this Year’s Shuttleworth Anniversary show with legacy Shuttleworth light aircraft was a welcome return to that concept.

    I feel there could be scope for making the shows more fun without diluting the flying spectacle – this, to me, is about the only significant failing against La Ferte Alais or Old Rhinebeck. Guest commentators (such as Jeremy Spake this year) can add something different. The vigorous Chipmunk has also made the shows more dramatic and I think the theme is worth pursuing.

    Also, as noted elsewhere, obstructions on the flightline are not welcome. A good job has been done in discouraging windbreaks, vans near the front, and raised tailgates and I would welcome the withdrawal of speakers and flagpoles from the crowdline so that the unique display line can be seen more fully.

    Only 8 weeks to the first show – will the ANEC be displaying?

    TonyA
    Participant

    I think there is a view that the late Allison models, such as in the P-63 had got their supercharger limitations well and truly sorted out – indeed they had infinitely variable automatic adjustment rather than 2-speed selections as on the Merlin. However, by this time, there were very few aircraft to take advantage as the US was using either radials or Packard Merlins and the P-63 had a stigma from looking like the P-39.

    The survival of the Allison in non-aviation activities such as boat racing and tractor pulling, not to mention incorporation of various parts and ideas in the current 3000+HP racing Merlins must say something about its fundamental merits.

    in reply to: Highest percentage of survivors #1560185
    TonyA
    Participant

    In survival terms the B-23 does very well. Only 38 were built and they were out of front-line action by the start of WWII so they wer mostly used as executive transports which meant they didn’t get scrapped. Then many carried on as transports post-war leaving about 16(?) or nearly 50% surviving today. Although I don’t think any are airworthy today, there were quite a few flying well into the ’70s

    in reply to: Florida Warbirds – Help? #1602677
    TonyA
    Participant

    Also at Kissimmee are Stallion 51 with a fleet of P-51s plus a few others although, as a commercial operation, access may be limited.

    Further, in an industrial unit off the approach road to Flying Tigers is White One – an FW190 airworthy restoration project.

    The Splash-In at Lake Parker is also an interesting part of Sun’N’Fun – much more relaxed than the main airfield.

    The museum at Clearwater is indeed closed. Most of the aircraft moved elsewhere in the area (can’t remember where) except the Neptune which was dumped at sea to create a Coral Reef.

Viewing 10 posts - 121 through 130 (of 130 total)