nice looking plane though
ha *thumbs up*
i do believe you its just when a picture file is compressed it looses detail, so it made it look abit cartoony to me
Just curious is that like a caravan Park behind the Ryanair?? Or is it just Buildings?
🙂
they are houses. last time i was in Lanzarote there was a law that said that no house can be over 2 stories tall, and must be painted white or that peachy colour. not sure if this is still the case?
might be the way its edited then. it still looks a tad cartoony to me
is it me or is that photo seriously fake.
the 787 looks like a computer graphic. whilst i think the model 40 is real, their are no shadows on the 787 as their are on the model 40. and the light is only shining on the leading edges of the 787.
Definitely no reason there for it to hunt due to heat haze! No modern AF lens on a modern camera should have any problem in those conditions.
just a thought.
Hmm… I’ll be honest, because there’s no point in doing anything else. If manual focus is giving you better results than auto then your lens is faulty.
exactly what i was thinking. unless the lens is hunting due to heat haze, i can see no reason why AF would be worse than MF. maybe its just in your mind?
aweful pictures.
Exactly what I was going to say!
exactly what ive done
pretty sure they operate as aer lingus regional
http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2010/01/26/337610/aer-arann-to-operate-12-routes-as-aer-lingus-regional.html
though that dosent explain their mainline routes going missing
Iran. its full of old stuff. most of them still flying commercially too
nice pic, if a tad over-exposed. not too much of an issue though. itll take you time to get used to your camera
im sorry but that is one ugly aeroplane