dark light

bms44

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 271 through 285 (of 309 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Money no object #1279104
    bms44
    Participant

    ….forgot my hat!…what did Stuart Gowans say about ‘everytime this f*c*ing Gannet was mentioned’ in an earlier thread? Well let’s think about another Gannet, a different one this time, probably a COD Mk 4 in 849 Squadron markings, Oxford Blue overall, the spinner in black and yellow stripes and the Mambas making a sound like a wasp befitting the colours. ;)… still, money being no object, let’s get that ‘ f*c*ing Gannet’ out of the financial hole it currently finds itself in….and getting deeper by the month, allegedly.

    in reply to: Money no object #1279114
    bms44
    Participant

    …and for the oldies, how about a Barracuda (Mk II) : the Mk V was overdeveloped to the point of being nearly-ugly, the Mk II’s were in my view, interesting, with everything folded like a weird origami arrangement they could be decidedly unattractive, but out of a total of almost 3000 all that remains are the sad parts at Yeovilton. Can’t you just visualise one turning onto short finals,as per a carrier approach, gear, flaps and hook down, the pilot juggling his throttle controlling his height, the delightful Merlin putt- putt- putting as it crosses the runway threshold and he cuts the power……
    ….but I suspect there’s more chance of resurrecting a Dodo from DNA found in an amber fossil…
    …. OK….. I’ll get my coat 🙁

    in reply to: Hurricane Fuselage- why was it bolted together? #1306031
    bms44
    Participant

    Hurricane Fuselage- why was it bolted together?

    Hawker’s probably considered a more complex fuselage of stressed skin, but the method of construction already proved in the earlier Fury and Harts enabled a quantity production run to be got under way without too much delay, at a time when a few far-sighted men saw the need for a build-up in our fighter defences. True, the later marks of Hurricane had stressed skin metal covered wings, rather than the fabric covered wings of earlier, but the Hurricane probably marks the turning point of this hybrid type of aircraft construction. Complexity of assembly and mass production was to prove a altogether more difficult for the Spitfire, at that time a much more radically- engineered design. But thank goodness for both designs, and considering the Hurricane first flew 73 years ago and they’re still flying today, Sir Sidney Camm’s design team didn’t do too badly : damn sight easier to replace rivets and plates than tired sick welds.

    in reply to: Duxford New Years Eve visit. #1254147
    bms44
    Participant

    Duxford New Years Eve visit.

    Excellent selection of photographs Gary, thank you: there was a time when I could reach Duxford in an hour or so, but am now 500 miles away,:( haven’t been back for a decade, so photos such as yours go a long way to satisfy the nostalgia of an exile such as me.Thanks for sharing them. 🙂 Brian

    in reply to: Hermes prototype G-AGSS #1399684
    bms44
    Participant

    Hermes prototype G-AGSS

    Papa Lima, this link should enable you to purchase a photograph of the ill-fated Hermes. I think the prices are fairly reasonable, unlike many agencies.
    (I was recently asked for £46 for a digital A4 reproduction from another source. :confused: ) Hope this helps, regards, Brian

    http://www.ajjcollection.co.uk/AGAA.HTM

    in reply to: Gannet XA308 – MAM #1400514
    bms44
    Participant

    That seems like a very reasonable assumption Albert, even now, looking back after so many years have passed. I must admit though I don’t know how much commonality existed with the various panels of the T and AS variants,certainly the bulge below the cockpits on the trainers was larger and more pronounced, but apart from that rather obvious difference many other parts/panels would have been interchangeable. Wonder if the inside of the different panels would have been stencilled at some stage in their service life with the aircraft serial and could thus solve the mystery? Would that be a possible task perhaps from someone nearer the present location of XA308? or maybe even a written request to the right source? [Am thoroughly enjoying this, but must sign off tonight.(I’ll probably drift off hearing of the bumble-bee drone of Mambas in full song in my head! (with any luck!)] I’ll look again in the morning. Brian

    in reply to: Gannet XA308 – MAM #1400525
    bms44
    Participant

    Gannet T.2 XA508

    That’s a very interesting photo Albert, as closer scrutiny of the nose (above the day-glo panel) indicates another panel with grey and sky colours, and the top half of a number (possibly ‘7’ ) nose code.This grey/sky scheme was most definitely non-standard on the trainer type, the panel almost certainly having been taken (borrowed or otherwise acquired) from an AS variant.(When the Double Mamba power unit was removed from the aircraft for major servicing or an engine change, generally the split was made at the demarcation aft of the intakes (in other words the cowling section painted white on XA310) would be extracted from the fuselage with the entire engine(s) pod. At a training establishments (and on no-longer-flying aircraft) it would not be unusual for a replacement engine pod to be taken from another aircraft and inserted, similarly panels could be (and were) mixed up also. Obviously on front line units this practice would not be encouraged! As this aircraft was saved from the breakers it could well have been involved latterly in such actions as described. Brian

    in reply to: Gannet XA308 – MAM #1400820
    bms44
    Participant

    Re.Gannet T.2 XA508 and XA510

    Here’s a shot of a sister aircraft, XA510, at the end of her flying career and nearing the end of her useful life as an instructional aircraft for training RN Artificers on airframes and engines at HMS “CONDOR”, RNAS Arbroath in 1963. At this stage all the onboard systems were still functional, engines were regularly run and wings folded on the internal hydraulics,and her ‘silver’ finish is still pristine.( She was to end her days some six years later at an Elgin scrapyard.) 🙁

    in reply to: Gannet XA308 – MAM #1401277
    bms44
    Participant

    Gannet XA308 – MAM

    I’ll don my anorak to throw in my tuppence-worth!…the trainer versions of the Gannet in Royal Navy were always in aluminium finish, with standard yellow wing and fuselage bands until towards the end of their service, the introduction of the Red/Orange ‘day- glo’ paints, usually around tail and fin, (but not rudder) ,wing and nose.( a most unstable colour and subject to extreme and variable fading.) These variants were never in the extra dark sea grey and sky scheme. (Whilst on the subject of Gannets, the Anti-Submarine variants, an error that has been perpetuated over the years by many illustrators is the continuation of the grey from the upper wing surface over the fuselage bulges over the exhaust outlets.They were always Sky, the Grey ended sharply at the wing roots and the anti-slip panels lay along the roots also.)
    That having been said though,whist we’re still fortunate enough to have a Gannet to wander round and reminisce over, the impracticabilities of keeping it in an aluminium paint, particularly if it is outside, subject to our British weather can perhaps be overlooked if a light grey paint with more stable properties is applied to preserve the old lady.Check the Avatar, guys, guess who’s a Gannetophile! Is that a proper word? …Should be…!

    in reply to: Print Enlargement #463187
    bms44
    Participant

    Thank you all for taking the time to reply to my query; apologies for the delay in replying, I haven’t accessed the forum since last visit.
    In the interim, however, my son has since told me of the difficulties, nay, impossibilities of enlarging digital thumbnails, some 130 x 95 pixels, to a decent and still sharp image, particularly without access to the original photographic negative, print, or a digital image. It would seem my idea of converting a thumbnail image (of outstanding clarity) to a printable 10″ x 8″ is just not on!

    in reply to: Photo puzzle #1379898
    bms44
    Participant

    Photo Puzzle

    …for cloud-seeding to precipitate rainfall, perhaps? ..not that we needed to do that too often, before this global warming reached us….

    in reply to: Some English Stuff #1388996
    bms44
    Participant

    T…..Boulton Paul SEA Balliol, methinks, bms44

    in reply to: Cockpit photo Quiz 4756 Pt IIb #1410138
    bms44
    Participant

    Thanks James, it’s been helping me convalesce whilst at home this week and take my mind off other mundane problems….but to quote an old football pundit…’it’s a funny old game isn’t it?’ …nothing ever totally black and white in this business it seems, there’s always the exception that proves the rule.

    And back to your original post, what is the background on the snapshot, and the posssible South American connection?

    Cheers, Brian

    And OK, so nobody likes a smart b*****d, but it has been fun!! Any more?

    in reply to: Cockpit photo Quiz 4756 Pt IIb #1410584
    bms44
    Participant

    Cockpit photo Quiz 4756 Pt IIb

    Herewith a couple of genuine Avenger photographs for comparison, but with the advantage of a clarity that should allow many points of cross reference to be made (including the sight on the cockpit coaming, neatly placed between the leather padding. Must admit am a little confused over the gunsight (on JDK’s original photo, placed on the right hand side) What do you think?
    Brian

    in reply to: Cockpit photo Quiz 4756 Pt IIb #1412419
    bms44
    Participant

    Cockpit photo Quiz 4756 Pt IIb

    …Still sticking with the Avenger. Your eyes are good Crazymainer…I can’t make out the foot pedal, far less an emblem thereon!

    I’ll own up now though and offer credit to John Weal’s cockpit instrumentation key in Eric Brown’s ‘Wings of the Navy’ for the following..

    Strong points in Avenger’s favour (or favor!) electrics box on right cockpit wall, recognition switches, battery switches, gun camera, torpedo etc etc.
    ‘T’ handle above right rudder pedal = wing fold lock, centrally placed compass D/I box in front of control column has de-icer and cockpit heat controls below it. General instrument layout (apart from standard blind flying panel) matches the drawing too closely to be anything else. I’ll scan the drawing and try to post it if that helps..if that doesn’t infringe copyrights ..

    Brian S.

Viewing 15 posts - 271 through 285 (of 309 total)