dark light

bms44

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 309 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Arrester hook i.d #984068
    bms44
    Participant

    The photo flash hasn’t helped display the digits on the casting : why not try a rubbing with a soft pencil or crayon on a piece of paper over them? Might help a bit to establish the numbers/letters, then the lads here in the know might tie it down from their various parts listings : I have no access to such info, not that I would ever need it, not being a collector of bits!:)

    in reply to: Do we have a for sale or trade section? #989333
    bms44
    Participant

    We could always use our avatars to show things we have for sale:diablo::D

    …so how much you want for the nice set of wheels then Bruggen 130 ? :diablo::D

    in reply to: Seafire Identity Wanted #993386
    bms44
    Participant

    Original post by Acklington
    So the 805 markings are history from August 1946.

    Having played about with the Squadron badge photo, the only one that fits the bill would appear to be 805 : it would appear to be the group of palm trees that’s the prominent feature in the very small badge.
    (just my twopence worth, I know everybody else has moved on!) 😮 Brian
    PS Love threads like this, would that I could find house clearances that yielded such treasures!

    in reply to: 2 or 3 from my back yard, what happens over yours? #403520
    bms44
    Participant

    This little bird not leaving a contrail, altitude maybe 5 metres, but going through some more shots from yesterday (and deleting most) was intrigued to see the wings forming almost a crinoline in the hover. The dedication of these starlings has earned my admiration, and like pistonrob, I generally only see the high altitude flights on a north westerly heading. No more feathered friends however, promise.:o

    in reply to: 2 or 3 from my back yard, what happens over yours? #403641
    bms44
    Participant

    Not the type of wings I normally photograph, but of the feathered type as per your buzzard? This one over my back yard yesterday…not sure if it’s mum or dad but both are working all daylight hours to feed the two chicks…

    in reply to: New Spitfire #1077857
    bms44
    Participant

    That’s not what Goering thought 😉

    Moggy

    ‘Dolfo’ Galland chose to disagree with Hermann though, Moggy…:)

    in reply to: The And Now For Something Completely Different….Thread #1067062
    bms44
    Participant

    Billed as a Ju 88 ….seagull ??????

    For Ju88 read Heinkel He115….

    bms44
    Participant

    Very sad ,but yes, well done the pilot, hope he/she is uninjured : we know how it could have turned out : thank heavens for wooden props! Brian

    bms44
    Participant

    …that was kinda spooky… so is this…

    bms44
    Participant

    How about a raising it to an F.3? (from a later era, but it still took off from water with help)

    Likewise…which leads us neatly to an F-4…

    in reply to: Info required on strange memorial #1085604
    bms44
    Participant

    The Free French Air Force did not use the Mosquito during the war, but after the war the French bought 57 FB.VIs, 29 PR.XVIs and PR.34s, 23 NF.30s, and a few T.IIIs. The French FB.VIs saw some action against Viet Minh guerrillas in French Indochina, but they were quickly withdrawn from combat service. The French removed all their Mosquitos from service in 1950. Brian S.

    in reply to: Mustang Colour scheme #1086868
    bms44
    Participant

    There was a colour three-view in RAF Flying Review magazine of this aircraft by Peter Endsleigh-Castle in the late 50’s or early 60’s ,some of which I have boxed up in a cupboard (I used to await the monthly issue eagerly to see the latest colour drawing).
    The drawing was of a red aircraft, as per the Revell box , so they perpetuated an error that came from the artist having had wrong colour information initially, and subsequent issues corrected the colour to olive drab, after some correspondence,and there were some who agreed that the name was Millie ‘G’ , not ‘P’, if I remember.
    I’ll see if I can locate the drawing and follow-up info. At that time, information was not always of the best, and colour three -view air -brushed drawings were, for me, the proverbial bees-knees, and far more scarce than today with the great amount of in-depth research material available and the computer-produced aircraft profiles and other excellent and abundant art-work . Brian S.

    in reply to: Cloudy Cambrai Monday 16-05-2011 #517277
    bms44
    Participant

    Excellent shots Martin, of types that are seldom seen in my neck of the woods. Thought my computer screen had pixellated when I scrolled down to the Gerrman Tornado! 😉

    in reply to: Arm Waver's Abbo #518117
    bms44
    Participant

    “Abbo” – for a moment I got excited and thought these were photographs from late-lamented Abbotsinch! Good stuff though all the same.

    You remember Abbotsinch as ‘Sanderling’ before it became Glasgow’s airport Steve? You don’t have any photos to share do you? I was at an ‘At Home’ in 1959…but sadly had no camera. 🙁 Brian

    in reply to: General Discussion #330247
    bms44
    Participant

    [QUOTE=Lincoln 7;1742766]

    My first motorcycle..a Lambretta Innocenti moped, 49cc., terrorised the neighbours in our cul-de-sac if they could see me amidst the acrid blue fumes akin to the Red Arrows display….ho hum…Did you ever put Castrol “R” in the two stroke petrol to make it smell like an Isle Of Man TT bike,?. we did.

    Lincoln .7

    No, not Castrol ‘R’ if I recall, but at that age I’d never have known what a TT bike would have smelt like… I just remember a gallon of petrol was 4/6d (say less than 25P) and it lasted like FOREVER!! Happy days Lincoln!
    ( couple of years later moved on to a Tiger Cub, then a Thunderbird 750 twin…I’ll post a photo when I can dig it out!)

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 309 total)