dark light

bms44

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 309 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Lancaster Fuel C0ck Reqd @ BBMF #1093603
    bms44
    Participant

    Oops! I see the post has been edited. Well done that man! Lesson there for us all then : brain in gear before opening mouth and inserting Fuel c0ck – chain driven or not. 😮

    in reply to: Lancaster Fuel C0ck Reqd @ BBMF #1093614
    bms44
    Participant

    I’ve been following this thread from the sidelines : interesting to see the rapid response akin to stirring up a hornet’s nest as a result of the rather non-gracious initial request from the anonymous BBMF member. I suppose you guys would know who it was. What is gratifying though is the way those that can help are pulling out the stops to do so. Well done you lads, and shame on the individual for his ill-chosen own shot in the foot. 😉

    in reply to: Gannet XG882 #1095462
    bms44
    Participant

    is it stll available?!!

    If you PM me pagen01, I’ll send you the contact details for the owner.;)

    in reply to: Elgin scrapyard revisited #1095534
    bms44
    Participant

    I’m sure I recall seeing a black Jaguar with ‘the saint’ logo on the fin at Lossie. I think it was painted for aerobatic displays.

    ….you’re not wrong Stuart H. Brian S.:cool:

    in reply to: Gannet XG882 #1095550
    bms44
    Participant

    Wonder why her prop was removed and dumped in front of her?

    ….or the cockpits’ glazing smashed, or the wheel doors removed,or the aileron linkages severed? Don’t think the owner had anything to do with any of this : as I indicated, there’s no security round the aircraft, any opportunist scrappy and his mate could have a go at removing the prop with a sledgehammer and a crowbar or two. Pity the sods weren’t pinned to the deck under it in the attempt. 😡

    in reply to: Gannet XG882 #1095720
    bms44
    Participant

    is there anyway anyone can help the owner.. (if he wants help) .. just a thought ??

    The owner, if it is the same one who bought it, is a businessman not short of a bob or two.( Is that a libellous statement? It’s not intended to be!) 😮

    in reply to: Gannet XG882 #1095723
    bms44
    Participant

    This is Gannet T.5. XG882 but is as you will probably know, a composite of XA463 and XG889, formerly gate guard at Lossiemouth (771/LM). These shots were taken some years ago at Errol airfield, located between Dundee and Perth. The airfield is host to fairly large ‘boot sales’ and stalls weekends and whilst viewing the aircraft in its unsecure and uncovered location was a source of great pleasure to such as me and no doubt would be to you,my fellow forumites, there is the element who derive their jollies by wanton vandalism and destruction. I haven’t seen it of late, I must admit, but as you can see it was in much better condition then , albeit with some weathering of paint on the spinners, and I would not be in a hurry to see it again in its present state. 😡

    in reply to: My efforts from North Weald 25/04/10 #457362
    bms44
    Participant

    Nice selection of photos, good to see the Spit driver wearing the leather headgear : I know needs must when safety rules apply but imho the bonedomes look ‘wrong’ in these aircraft. The monochrome effect helps with the period feel too, but that was no accident, I imagine!;) Did the Seafire not fly, by the way?

    in reply to: Royal Navy carrier landing 'bats'. #1100131
    bms44
    Participant

    This could rumble on and on Bager1968…. but if you look closely at the Panther shot you could be forgiven for thinking the bats had been accentuated and drawn over rather crudely to make them stand out in the photo…there seems to be something not quite right…..probably a pencil…no Photoshop back then…:confused:

    in reply to: Royal Navy carrier landing 'bats'. #1100852
    bms44
    Participant

    To further add fuel to the fire… I would suggest there was no hard and fast rule as to type of bats used by either navy…::confused:

    in reply to: Royal Navy carrier landing 'bats'. #1100873
    bms44
    Participant

    [QUOTE=Bager1968;1572268]To further what Imsbtn said in post #7 above…

    RN flag (bat) frame = square

    USN flag (paddles) frame = round.

    ]/QUOTE]

    ….If the bats in my earlier post photo (#4) (Korean Panther recovery).. are round , then one of us should have gone to ‘Specs*vers’…;)

    in reply to: Mendlesham Memorial to the 34th Bombardment Group USAAF #1100910
    bms44
    Participant

    bms44….my apologies, Sir!

    Your apologies accepted Andy…I quite understand the ‘red mist’ sentiment you expressed. My apologies for spitting out the dummy! What’s the best way now to get the fund started? Via the newspaper or through Key Publishing? Ideas anyone?

    in reply to: Mendlesham Memorial to the 34th Bombardment Group USAAF #1102046
    bms44
    Participant

    .
    Meanwhile, cannot some fund be started to try to replace it? What better place to kick that off than here?

    What a good idea…wish I’d thought of that! Oh hang on a minute…I believe I did.

    Never mind, I’m obviously on the outer fringes of this forum clique ..I’ll get my coat…for the last time. Feel free to carry on with your lynch-mob sentiments…I still believe in upholding the law, such as it is….:(

    in reply to: Mendlesham Memorial to the 34th Bombardment Group USAAF #1104018
    bms44
    Participant

    As one with particularly poignant memories of the Mendlesham base and the good people I met in the area when I was living in East Anglia I share the disgust at such an abhorrent act of theft and wanton destruction. Please keep us all advised if funds are to be raised to replace the plaque or make some other gesture of reparation : I’m sure any future outpouring of goodwill would far outweigh the mindless attitude of the perpetrators of this outrage. Count me in. Brian 😡

    in reply to: Strathallan Museum, Scotland #1104958
    bms44
    Participant

    A few more here

    http://picasaweb.google.co.uk/crwhitton/Strathallan#

    Good to see these other shots Robert : that’s the true value of these archived photos, of aircraft that have been disposed of, or have otherwise gone, perhaps forever, but these snapshots in time will live on. All credit to you for your forward thinking, back then. Regards, Brian S.

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 309 total)