dark light

Dave Homewood

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,546 through 1,560 (of 4,847 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Kamikaze pilot in WWI RAF #1334160
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    By the way, Onishi’s full name was Takajiro Onishi

    http://ww2db.com/person_bio.php?person_id=170

    in reply to: Geodetic design #1334880
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Thanks everyone, some interesting discussion here.

    in reply to: Doug Dallison's Hawker Tempests #1249075
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Murder? I got lost long ago in this thread…

    in reply to: Doug Dallison's Hawker Tempests #1250752
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    buried or scrapped! 😮

    😮

    in reply to: Doug Dallison's Hawker Tempests #1251316
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    I see. Thanks Mark. So, where are they now? Are they still with the Arnold family?

    I didn’t think that a Tempest had come to NZ. Mr Dallison apparently used to have an Isaac’s Fury which he took to the UK for some film work in the early 1990’s, then brought back. I don’t know which film though.

    in reply to: USAF in Cook Islands during WWII ? #1252885
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Sorry to bring this back up to the top but I have just located more information.

    The first aircraft to land on Rarotonga in the Cook Islands group was the RNZAF Lockheed Lodestar NZ3508, captained by Flt Lt Tom Mounsey, on the 25th of Nov 1944. The airport was constructed by the New Zealand Aerodrome Services Branch, and was a gift to the Cooks from NZ Prime Minister Peter Fraser.

    This was reported (with photo of said first landing) in NZ Wings magazine in August 1986, as part of a wider report about an RNZAf Exercise there from 8th July-5th August 1986 called Operation Joint Venture, with Hercules’s, Iroquois’s, Andovers, Skyhawks, an Orion and a Boeing 727 plus NZ army troops and Navy Wasp.

    in reply to: BBMF sold? #1255834
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    At least we have 2 historical flights in this country unlike anyone else in the world.

    We have two – the RNZAF Historic Flight, and the RNZAF

    in reply to: What is this? – Triple Cross #1255846
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    DaveH

    Was Sgt. Wilson promoted to, or demoted from, Air Marshal, I wonder? 🙂

    Mark

    🙂 Just a Sgt Wilson impersonator I’m afraid.

    in reply to: What is this? – Triple Cross #1256030
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Here are the night attack scenes, and also a look at the early scene in Jersey where the Germans are invading that island. Is that really Jersey docks?

    in reply to: What is this? – Triple Cross #1256061
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Thanks for posting.

    Mark

    No problem. It is in two scenes, one making strafing/bombing attacks at night and one later strafing a German column. I have added a shot of the column here too, and also a couple that Battle of britain film fans might enjoy – Trevor Howard in a Fighter Command control centre… sounds familiar.

    in reply to: What is this? – Triple Cross #1256297
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Thanks, that looks like the aircraft.

    There are several aircraft at the end of the film, see these shots. Some have solid noses. Some have round glazed noses.

    Also there is a Spitfire with invasion stripes and blue spinner. Anyone know which one?

    in reply to: Duxford Firefly on the move ? #1257543
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    [QUOTE=Mike J]Worthless?[QUOTE]

    I do believe that was the word he used. I was quite gobsmacked because i had always assuned that the rarer WWII type, and one equally as popular at airshows when they are flying, would have been quite something of value even when in a dissasembled and unrestored state (much like the one that has left Duxford for Holland).

    Still, I guess his comments come from his view as an engineer with a restoration company whose business is to make its money from restoring airframes, and they see it is a much more risky investment – it would be harder to find parts, a bigger job to restore to the air than a Spitfire that they have all the tooling for, and less attractive on the market when complete as it has less “appeal” than a Spitfire. It would (like a Spitfire) likely cost a lot more to restore than they can sell it for when complete, and that margin for loss there is probably higher. So in their eyes, not worth it I guess.That is the impression I got from the chap. Nice guy he was too. Not the sort to talk bull.

    However, if someone was to come along with a passion for the Firefly and invest in it for themselves to own and operate, rather than for resale, it’d be a whole different story. That is what’s needed.

    in reply to: RAf trainees in America? #1257931
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Thanks everyone. I got some interesting responses here and on other forums. Cheers.

    in reply to: Duxford Firefly on the move ? #1257933
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    a Spitfire especially one with a good covenant is worth a lot of money, probably more than a Firefly.

    I should say so. While at Ardmore last month I was told by an AvSpecs engineer that the two Fireflies they have sitting in a container are worthless, no-one wants them, because they will cost so much to restore and will never get the return value of a Spitfire. Sad, I’d love to see one of them in the air.

    in reply to: Filming the Few for the Many #1264154
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Wow! Is that a photo or a painting? Excellent either way!

Viewing 15 posts - 1,546 through 1,560 (of 4,847 total)