Blimey, he looks about 14 in that photo!!
Thanks Peter. So basically they were much the same except the engine then I guess. The Ripon doesn’t look quite right with the inline engine, the radial suits the airframe much better in my opinion.
Interestingly that Baffin, S1358, joined the RNZAF and became NZ164 with No. 2 (Wellington) Territorial Squadron, and in 1940 it was with the New Zealand General Reconnaissance Squadron at RNZAF Station Whenuapai. Like most Baffins it was broken up at RNZAF Rongotai in 1941.
A flight of No. 24 Squadron Wirraways also flew under the Sydney bridge
http://home.st.net.au/~dunn/shboz.htm
And some US Kittyhawks
http://home.st.net.au/~dunn/shbyanks.htm
You can read more about Queenie VI here
http://home.st.net.au/~dunn/ozatwar/queenie.htm
I read a great bridge story recently, sometime in the 1930’s the mad barnstormer and former WWI pilot, Sqn Ldr Malcolm “Mac” MacGregor, apparently flew his aircraft under the bridge at Hamilton, NZ, pulled straight up into a loop and went under again as he came down!! So basically he looped around the bridge!!
Then there were a couple of bridges at Hamilton, not sure which one but I would imagine it would have been Victoria Bridge, as it was probably for a public display and regattas, etc are held near this bridge. Either way, all the bridges are the same height. Here’s a couple of period photos of Victoria Bridge, Hamilton.
Alternately it may have been the old Railway Bridge, seen below too.
This is going to bug me till I find that report again now – I know what I read as I was really surprised that the RAF would lease F-16’s.
The squadron was not ‘based’ in Asia, it was there for some short term detachment of some sort, it was a temporary lease, maybe two or three months, being discussed. It may have been in Malaysia. or maybe Indonesia, not necessarily Singapore.
This had nothign to do with the RAF wanting to purchase the fighter, the report said they’d leased them to fly for a short term.
Hey, the Harrier is still in frontline service and it gets talked about all the time on this forum, as do many other jet types still in service
Well, OK, perhaps what I read was incorrect, or perhaps it was planned but never happened. You cannot beleive everything you read I suppose. I can’t recall exactly where I read it after all this tiem but it might have been reported in New Zealand Wings as I was a regular subscriber back then.
As for historic – I consider anything that might have happened a decade ago to be historic and certainly not modern. Modern means now to me. Last year is historic! I guess it must depend how old you are, older people may not think the same way.
It was definately reported as a RAF squadron on attachment to somewhere in Asia, nothing to do with the Saudis what I read
I find it rather interestimg that Rearwin became Commonwealth Aircraft in 1943, when at the time there was already rather a large company called Commonwealth Aircraft Corporation building aeroplanes – was there any connection?
Elliot, what has happened with this? Is your friend in NZ now or still coming here?
I only recently discovered that there is still a significant high ground wreck in NZ, near Nelson. It was a Hudson bomber that hit a hill, and I am told by someone who has been there and filmed it not too long ago that the remains are quite substantial. The place is quite innaccessable and on private land, but it is interesting that it is still around nowadays. I wonder, if helicoptered out, if there would be anything worth using for a restoration – apparently the tail and at least one wing plus engines are there.
and BTW the race starts when the 5 red lights go out, not before then
The warm up lap is counted as part of the race laps, and the 7th and 8th points have been awarded, so I am not sure your statement is correct there Don. My understanding has always been that the race begins at the start of the warm up lap. If this is incorrect, I am willing to conceed.
and BTW the race starts when the 5 red lights go out, not before then
The warm up lap is counted as part of the race laps, and the 7th and 8th points have been awarded, so I am not sure your statement is correct there Don. My understanding has always been that the race begins at the start of the warm up lap. If this is incorrect, I am willing to conceed.
So, what was the pre-race interview between Martin Brundle and Bernie Eccleston all about adwwebber? Unfortunately due to the selfishness of the FIA bosses Eccleston and Mosley, foreign networks who buy the feed from the track with the Brundle/Allen commentary are not allowed to see the pre-race show. So we always hear about something interesting a driver said etc while they’re commentating but are not allowed to see it. This question was raised recently on the TVNZ coverage where viewers send in questions for presenter Bob McMurray (formerly a top engineer with McLaren) and he explained it wasn’t simply TVNZ not forking out the money for the show, but some daft rule by FIA.
I see now a group of fans in the USA has already filed a law suit against FIA for their ticket refund and travelling expenses. I think this could be an interesting battle in the courts, after all, they did see a “race”, and a unique one at that, but not what they paid for I suppose.
As for costs at the F1 I’ve heard that a lot of the races are highly expensive. My mate knew a chap who flew from the UK to Canada for the week and went to the Canadian GP, because it was cheaper than getting the ticket for Silverstone, which was simply km’s down the road from his house. I believe Monaco and Bahrain are not cheap either. So I don’t think that Indianapolis is unique in overcharging.
So, if the USA is dropped from the F1 circuit, which country do you think will be awarded the race? Probably Russia I think, they have already built a track I think as they had hoped to get in when Bahrain and China got their races. Plus I doubt Russia will have all the anti-smoking rules, etc that Europe has.
So, what was the pre-race interview between Martin Brundle and Bernie Eccleston all about adwwebber? Unfortunately due to the selfishness of the FIA bosses Eccleston and Mosley, foreign networks who buy the feed from the track with the Brundle/Allen commentary are not allowed to see the pre-race show. So we always hear about something interesting a driver said etc while they’re commentating but are not allowed to see it. This question was raised recently on the TVNZ coverage where viewers send in questions for presenter Bob McMurray (formerly a top engineer with McLaren) and he explained it wasn’t simply TVNZ not forking out the money for the show, but some daft rule by FIA.
I see now a group of fans in the USA has already filed a law suit against FIA for their ticket refund and travelling expenses. I think this could be an interesting battle in the courts, after all, they did see a “race”, and a unique one at that, but not what they paid for I suppose.
As for costs at the F1 I’ve heard that a lot of the races are highly expensive. My mate knew a chap who flew from the UK to Canada for the week and went to the Canadian GP, because it was cheaper than getting the ticket for Silverstone, which was simply km’s down the road from his house. I believe Monaco and Bahrain are not cheap either. So I don’t think that Indianapolis is unique in overcharging.
So, if the USA is dropped from the F1 circuit, which country do you think will be awarded the race? Probably Russia I think, they have already built a track I think as they had hoped to get in when Bahrain and China got their races. Plus I doubt Russia will have all the anti-smoking rules, etc that Europe has.
Oh dear, now I read that the FIA governing body has had the audacity to chrage the seven teams who did not take part, stating “they committed acts prejudicial to the interests of a competition by failing to ensure they had suitable tyres and refusing to allow cars to compete.”
What? It was the supplier’s fault, and the track’s fault. Not the teams’ fault. So the FIA wanted them to go out and kill themselves?
Oh, and to those people above saying there are no Americans involved, have you not heard of BAR? That stands for British American Racing – does that not count? And even if there are no Americans, does there need to be? It is still a fantastic sport without having to have a ‘home-team’ allegiance. There are no Kiwi drivers and have not been in F1 for years, and even Mclaren, the New Zealand team, calls itself British now, but we still support and love the sport here without any NZ connections.
I much prefer it to CART/Champcars/Indy/Superbikes etc where we do have Kiwi drivers to support, simply because F1 is the world class pinacle of all motorsport.