Hmm, only the latter one sounds remotely worth watching. :rolleyes:
Has anyone heard anything more about the film being made about Russian woman pilots in WWII? It is going to feature all the Brietling team pilots. I’m curious to know more, especially where it will be made and what aircraft will be involved. That one sounds like it will be worth paying to see.
And what has happened with the pre-production of Tom Cruise’s film The Few. It was listed in the past on his IMDb page as in pre-production – now it has been removed. Did all the objections to it ensure that the production was canned?
Thanks for those great photos Mark12. Can you tell us anything about that Hudson please? Was it flying then? Was it owned by the CAF too? Where is it now?
Is that a Sunderland in that hangar??
I have now had a look through Roy Fisher’s log books again. The aircraft in which he crash landed – the one he called Pukerimu III, was Spitfire IX, MA223, coded HN-R. If anyone happens to have any photos of this aircraft I’d be pleased to see them.
Incidentaly I noted down the serials of the Spitfire Vb aircraft he flew in with 93 Sqn while in the Meditteranean theatre, in case anyone out there has any interest in this:
EP877
ER282 (seemed he flew this one a lot)
??118
EP873
ER815
ER894
ER925
AR530
ER599 (he flew this one a lot too)
EP530
ER542
ER610
ER737
ER542
His log books are really detailed compared with some I’ve seen and he saw a heck of a lot of action. But I don’t think he is credited with any kills. The only reference I’ve found is in “Spitfire – The New Zealand Story” by Gerald S. Morris which says that on the 11th of July 1943 F/O S.F. Browne got a half claim on a Ju88 while flying LZ840 HN-W. The footnote says:
“This claim was shared with P/O Fisher whilst acting as cover for landing ships. Misidentified as an e/a, Stan Browne was then shot down by HMS Warspite’s AA fire and was forced to bale out near Pachino in Southern Sicily. There’s gratitude for you! He returned by landing ship to Valetta, southern Malta and flew again the next day.”
I think Morris cannot have realised that P/O Fisher was a Kiwi too or he would have mentioned this in the book. Unless there were two P/O Fishers in 93 Sqn. The odd thing is Roy’s log mentions nothing. On 11 July 1943 his logbook simply says he flew pitfire IX BS553 ‘P’ and notes “Patrol frontline near Syracuse”. So, was this a different P/O Fisher then?
Thanks James. You answered the question whilst I was still trying to retype it – trying to find the words that might not make me sound as dumb as I apparently come across. 😀
Thanks again, it has been interesting. I never ever heard of the single seat version before.
Sorry Mike, I did actually get James’s point that they were designed to attack unescorted bombers in a war that never happened. I admit I worded my last question wrongly – what I meant was, when the RAF realised that things had gone horribly wrong for them and the enemy bombers were to be escorted from bases in France – did the RAF ever consider escorting the Defiants sent up to meet them rather than send them to the slaughter by themselves?
It seems to me that they were using these aircraft for a job they were totally unsuitable for, and it seems like total folly to use them at all and to waste so many lives and resources. I wonder if a half-measure could have been considered of an adequate fighter escort for the Defiants to distract the enemy escort so the Defiant crews could get into the bombers and do their job. I wonder if this had been done if they might have faired much better in the combat stakes.
I guess though finding adequate fighter escort may have been jolly difficult at that particular juncture of the war.
Thank you for all the interesting answers.
James, in the intended tactics of broadsiding bombers, was any provision considered for the Defiants to be escorted by fighters like the Hurricane into the attack? Or was this never considered necessary?
If they had been escorted into the bomber formations and the Hurricanes had tackled and distracted the enemy escort fighters, could they have been more successful in the Battle of Britain I wonder, rather than being left to attack by themselves and being slaughtered.
I like asking questions on this site – who needs books when there are so many people more expert than me willing to impart their wonderful knowledge for us all. 🙂
Yes ideed Charles, that’s quite right. Many young men lost their lives in training, it is really sad. If you ever get the opportunity to look at the books “For Your Tomorrow” by Errol Martyn (there are two volumes with a third being written now), they list every New Zealander who died in Air Force service from 1915-1998. The books detail the circumstances, and it’s so sad reading about the many training accidents that took lives. One that stunned me was an instructor pulled a loop in a Tiger Moth, and his pupil’s harness snapped. The forces threw him from the aircraft to his death. Awful. Another similar case was the cowl flew off mid flight and took the head off the pupil,in the front seat. The poor instructor had to return with the corpse and then go out with a search party to find the poor boy’s head.
It is also sad to read how many wartime pilots and aircrew were killed on the ground in things like car accidents – one even died falling off a swing in the park!! And many, many people in the wartime RNZAF personnel died from disease – particularly those who served in the Pacific. We see the cenotaphs and assume they were all killed in combat. Not so.
Not sure if both were but at least one of those Anson sandwiches in Aussie that James mentioned was fatal – the crew in the bottom plane were decapitated.
Thanks James. It would be interesting to hear more of what effects the cannon turret had on the aircraft. I did wonder if the recoil would be simply absorbed as vibration, now I know. I’ll bet there weren’t many Defiant gunners – or any turret gunners for that matter – who didn’t suffer significant hearing loss!
Has anyone got photos of the Martin Baker ejection seat Defiant? All in all it seems the airframe was rather versatile considering got a bad reputation from the beginning of the war. Poor old misunderstood Defiant.
I’m sure Classic Airframes will never hear the end of it from modellers if their US target tug scheme is fictional. It would be interesting to know what they’ve based it on.
Did the Defiant have forward firing guns? Your photos don’t show any from the angles they’re taken. Did the pilot have any guns to attack with too in case the turret seized or anthing went wrong?
Also, did Boulton Paul ever have a go at designing further fighters after the Defiant? Did they make anything else as good or better?
I’ve been thinking about the gunners in Defiants – as there has been much said here about both the cramped space they worked in and the tiny escape hatch they had should things go wrong, did the RAF select only their smallest gunners for the Defiant squadrons? Was there any height restrictions put on the crews?
Geoff, can you ask Mr Lucas please if this is the case? It would be fantastic to hear his experiences in the Defiant. I wish I could attend your signings.
Also, if the Defiant was designed to creep up beside bombers and broadside them as described by James, and as described in the article I posted above, what sort of effect did the recoil of the guns have on the aircraft when they were firing to one side? Anyone know? Was there a time limit on firing the guns before it became detrimental to the pilot’s handling of the aircraft? The same goes for other planes with turrets I guess, but the Defiant is tiny compared with most turreted planes, and has four heavy machine guns, so there must be some impact I’d guess. Or am I wrong? Maybe another question for Mr Lucas, Geoff.
When the Defiant switched to night fighting and proved a success, how long did it stay in service in that role? The article would suggest perhaps they were still around as late as 1944. Is that the case?
One final question. There is a 1/48th scale model of the Defiant out from Classic Airframes, and one decal option for the Target Tug version is in US colours. Does anyone know why they used them, over their own types? Had they used them offensively/efensively before or just got them from the RAF as TT Mk 1 versions? How many did they use? Where did they use them? The scheme in the boxart looks like a Meditteranean scheme. Any ideas?
See boxart here
http://www.classicairframes.com/new_products_frame.htm
I wish someone would build a flying exact-replica of the Defiant.
Wow – thanks. This might be asking a bit much, but do you have any idea of the years it was with the WAC? To try to date the photo.
Thanks again.
Thank you guys
Can’t quite recall the story behind the Harvard crash, (I scanned this from a book) I’ll have to recheck into it, but I think it might actually be Wodbourne. The hills look rather similar from certain angles. I’ll have a look when i get a chance.
The first Warbird I remember seeing (and I may have seen some before this as a kid but can’t recall) was a Harvard from the Roaring Forties display team. I would guess it must have been about 1986, I’d have been about 15. There was a locl aeroclub fly-in at Hamilton Airport (Rukuhia) which is nearby to here.
I was in the car with Mum, Dad, my sister and one of Dad’s pals. I’ll never forget this – the road between the old RNZAF part of the airport (now Pacific Aerospace) and the airport entrance is dug down below ground level, like you see on many airport perimeters. On the radio was “Reet Petite” by Jackie ?? (somebody, from the 1960’s in one of those 1980’s comebacks thanks to a film soundtrack). Right when the song got to where he sings “rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr reet petite”, this Harvard appeared ahead and flew low, hrd and fast straight at us. There was noting else in view but grass embankments either side and a Harvard making an attack. Wow, I was hooked. Even my sister was thrilled by it.
The airshow was my first that i recall (though I had been to many r/c airshows as Dad was into that – I thought and still think r/c is crap). There were four or five Harvards, a DH89 and some crappy little Hawker Fury replicas (Isaacs). That’s all i rememebr but I know I wanted more. I started reading NZ Wings magazine, and that was it.
Happy days. The next airshow I got to wasn’t till 1990, at Ardmore, but that was awesome – the Venom and Mustang tailchase was to die for! Pity we never see that routine nowadays….
I have always had a great interest in the RAF in World War Two. But as you mentioned ‘equivalents’, my greatest interest is in the wartime RNZAF (and that includes Kiwis in the RAF).
I am fascinated at how our tiny 1939 Air Force of 600 men expanded to over 40,000 during the war, 12,000 of whom went to the RAF. I love reading and hearing first-hand stories told by those who were involved. I think the most interesting period for me for both RNZAF at home and abroad is 1939-42. Amazing to think we were training pilots on Tiger Moths then Vildebeests and then sending them straight to Britain to jump into Spitfires, when most had never seen a monoplane fighter till that time! And we were using old airliners fitted and Tiger Moths with bombracks to protect our own shores while the best men went overseas. Amazing times.