dark light

Dave Homewood

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 4,036 through 4,050 (of 4,847 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Beijing Aviation Museum #1616538
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Sorry, posted in error

    Sorry posted on wrong thread

    in reply to: Oldest front-line aircraft #1616592
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Well the RAF still operates a Battle of Britain verteran Spitfire Mk II in the BBMF. Maybe that is the oldest?

    in reply to: Lowest time Lancaster #1617150
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    I’d think the Motat Lanc must have fairly high hours, having patrolled the Pacific with the French up till the mid 1960’s – the same goes for their others that were retired at the same time I guess.

    in reply to: Ugliest Aircraft. #1788309
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    The Lerche II – I would hate to see the first one. Perhaps it was designed by Lurch from the Addams Family (“You Rang?”)

    Either way I think the designer had been reading too many 1930’s Buck Rogers comics, or he’d been drinking the jet fuel. 🙂

    in reply to: Buck Rogers Harrier #1788316
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Yes it was a while now that I think about it. 🙁 I went to Duxford and Hendon in December 1993, and the Imperial War Museum Lambeth in early 1994 and early 1997. I also went to the Science Museum in early 1997 (Jan/Feb ish), and i got some nice home fideo of the place too.

    What a great idea making these wonderful places free. The British Government has got something right at least.

    The Auckland War Memorial Museum here in NZ used to be free, then they began to charge but they still let you in for free with an encouraged donation if you’re only visiting the war memorial part… a very very confusing system. I’d probably pay to go in there too, it is really a very good place to visit. Not too many museums where you can see a Zero, a Spitfire, a V1, a Blue Whale and an Elephant in the same place.

    in reply to: Hurricane chronology #1788605
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Is this one on the list of ten you mention Mike J? I cannot see the name of who owns this one. What I want to know is what is up with the colour scheme. Is this an authentic Canadian scheme? Or is it a made up one? Either way it looks very nice.
    http://www.airic.ca/html/hurricane_rcaf_5667.html

    in reply to: (Surviving) Piston-Provosts? #1788626
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    I think there is (or was) one in NZ at Omaka

    http://www.classicfighters.co.nz/aircraft/provost.htm

    in reply to: Buck Rogers Harrier #1788661
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Just a small, pedantic point. As a national museum, the Science Museum is one of several museums throughout the UK funded by central government and which are free at the point of entry, ie you don’t have to pay to get in. This list includes the Imperial War Museum and the RAF Museum (although the latter may charge for the new Milestones of Flight – I don’t know ‘cos I’ve not yet had the opportunity to visit).

    That’s interesting. I have been to all three museums you mention and I paid to get into each one. Is that because I am a ‘foreigner’? I’m not complaining, it was worth every penny to visit each. I do recall that the Science Museum, Victoria and Albert (which I didn’t get to see) and one other, maybe the National Gallery, was free between 4.30 and 6.00pm – but I decided i needed longer time than that to see the Science Museum, and I’m glad i did allow it because it was incredibly interesting. I have been to the IWM at Lambeth twice and the one at Duxford once and all cost money to get in.

    in reply to: Buck Rogers Harrier #1788865
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Yes the Short Solent is still at Motat in Auckland. It is the only Mk IV Solent in the world, and one of only two of the type extant (an earlier model is in Oakland California – which is the flying boat seen in Indiana Jones’s Raiders of the Lost Ark).

    And our NZ Solent is stunningly beautiful, restored faithfully by about 50 of its ex engineers, pilots and cabin crew in the 1980’s and 1990’s, it is now better than new. It is displayed in the hangar with a walkway beside it so the public can peer through all the windows on the starboard side, on both decks, and inside they have every detail including matchboxes, glasses, TEAL souviners, etc on the tables. It is the height of luxury flying. I’d love to take a trip in that bird, pity she’ll never fly again.

    in reply to: Eagles over London old movie #1789167
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Those Spitfire exhausts look pretty long, longer than usual, or is that just an optical illusion due to the angle from below?

    in reply to: Buck Rogers Harrier #1789288
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Well at least it is still in existence and wasn’t scrapped. I’d almost wager the wing is probably stored somewhere safe.

    I think it was very creditable for the museum to even display it when they obviously lacked the room to put the whole plane in there, and when it is so unattractive and is an insignificant aircraft on the scale of aviation development to the public at large who pay to enter the museum.

    Also, only a minority of Shorts Bros products are ugly – their products like the Sunderland, Empire, Solent and even the Stirling were gorgeous, and the Tucano ain’t bad either (or was that designeed by Embraer, I can’t recall who bought the design from whom).

    in reply to: Mark12 holiday snap – caption required. #1790514
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Just like the commonality between parts in the build of the CAC Boomerang and Wirraway.

    As for ejection seats, another major factor apart from the head touching the canopy, in fact moreso than, is the length of a pilot’s legs between waste and knees. If they’re too long and he ejects, bye bye legs.

    in reply to: The Southern Cross VH-USU #1790627
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Thanks Mark,

    I’ll try those suggested places for the log books.

    I’m sorry to hear about the replica’s problems but I’m glad it is to be rebuilt. The real one had a bit of a ding while in NZ in 1933 – on landing at Milson it taxied into a partially filled drain on the strip. The port wheel sank in, tipping it over ans busting the port prop and wingtip. I was told only yesterday by an old chap who remembers it that the tip was removed, cut up and sold by the crew as souviners, and they replaced and repaired it all within a few weeks.

    I’m grateful too for you looking out for a copy of that series. Thanks.
    All the best
    Dave

    in reply to: Damage report from Florida #1790638
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    I was wondering the same thing about this storm last night. I hope nothing has been damaged.

    Isn’t Stewart1a over there at the moment too?

    in reply to: Ugliest Aircraft. #1790687
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Idefinately think the Do335 is ugly, but it is very interesting all the same and its history makes it a classic.

    Ohers I could add like thay are the Bristol Freighter and the Carvair, both pug ugly but you are drawn to them because thet’re interesting aircraft and I’d prefer to have one than a modern Boeing or Airbus to shift my freight about. 🙂

Viewing 15 posts - 4,036 through 4,050 (of 4,847 total)