Actually during the war the RNZAF used to often add in a designation that denoted the role of the squadron too.
Like…
No. 3 (GR) Sqn – where GR stood for General Reconnaisance
No 14 (F) Sqn – Fighter Squadron
No 5 (FB) Sqn – Flying Boat Squadron
No 1 (BR) Sqn – Bomber Reconnaisance
No 25 (DB) Sqn – Dive bomber Sqn
No 40 (T) Sqn – Transport
Did other Empire squadrons use these designations? I’m not sure why they felt they needed to add it in, and it wasn’t always used, but I think it’s rather nice.
Dave
PS – the thing that really narks me is when the media writes (constantly) Airforce. That is NOT a word. It is Air Force, TWO WORDS!!! When will they learn???!!!
Lest We Forget
Wings Over The Navy…
Avengers!
Whoa! This is awful
Liberator
Yikes
Very sad. And another…
Photo 4
Photo 3 – label says P47 being loaded – I’m sure its not a P47
Photo 2
Hi Ashley,
When I was in the RNZAF, which is based directly on the RAF in everything they do, we were taught in ‘Service English’ class to write Sqn.
Anything else is incorrect in official Service Language.
Dave
Hi Steve.
I’m in my third year of a BA in Screen and Media. Your topic sounds great, all those hous of watching old war films.
I’m doing a year-long directed study at the moment learning about documentary making techniques, and I have chosen to make a doco film about the social side of the RNZAF during the war. It’s fascinating discovering some of the stories. I’m including all types, not just pilots.
For example I interviewed one lady who was a WAAF technical librarian – sounds boring till you hear that she had a highly specialised and secret job and the aircraft of the RNZAF right across the country and the Pacific were dependent on her on a daily basis as to whether they could fly or not. She had some great social stories of barracks life and going to dances with the Americans (who regularly spiked girls drinks!!) etc. too. Her fiance was killed in a raid over Europe, and she later met and married another airman. Her Dad was also in the RNZAF, and he had been given the secret task that if the Japs invaded he had to blow up RNZAF Harewood (now Christchurch International Airport!)
It has also been a great excuse to film in a few aircraft museums too.
Which films are you concentrating on for the dissertation? Or are there too many to name?
I know one thing, even though I’ve been getting consistently high grades, I’m defiantely not going on to do Honours or Masters. I’m busting to get out into the real world again and earn some real money. Fingers crossed for next year.
I just found this thread from last year which backs up what I was saying above about the Belle.
http://forum.airforces.info/showthread.php?s=&threadid=16758&highlight=first+25+missions
I did a lot of research last year into the two film versions as i was comparing the two in an essay for a documentary course I was studying at university. I am certain I came across a second B17 other than Hell’s Angels that also beat the Belle to 25 missions. I can’t find where I found this info now. 😡
I’m sure that the crew members won’t have all flown teir 25 missions in tha Belle either, as the films imply. Even if you had a regular plane you sometimes had to borrow another.
Dave
And another thing, the original film by William Wyler does not actually strictly follow the Belle’s final mission either. Camera crews flew on several missions in several aircraft to get the footage. Some camera crews were even shot down and killed.
And a significant amount wasn’t even filmed in Europe because they had problems with the film they’d taken and it was no good. So pick-up shots were done with the Belle’s crew in the USA once they’d got home. I’m not even sure if they were in the real Belle for these shots but I assumethey were.
This is why it took a year before the film was released because they had such production problems. Most propaganda was banged out quickly.
It is a great film, but has as much a mix of fact and fiction as the 1990 version, which as we know was not based on the truth of the final mission at all.