Top Gear, as it is right now, remains the best television programme to come out of Britain for many years, perhaps decades. It is the best British comedy, variety, fantasy, documentary and family entertainment show there is.
It’s presenters are great, with real genuinely likeable personailities and opinions that they freely share and love to defend – not the usual airhead twits or ponces that most presenters are these days.
5.5 million viewers is absolutely huge, that is about 1/12th of your country for goodness sake, How the hell can that be a small viewing figure when there are hundreds of other channels and entertainment sources to compete with. Even in the 1970’s when Britain only had three networks for the viewers to choose from 5.5 million was still a fairly healthy rating.
The show currently has spin-off shows running in the USA, Australia and goodness knows where else; it has its own magazine which seels worldwide; it has a live show which is touring the world (even to little old NZ for a second time now); it has three of the most recognisable and loved British presenters of this decade; and it has a huge worldwide audience. The show rates very well here in NZ and virtually everyone I know watches it, young or old, male or female. Even Mum watches it. I wonder if they actually bother to take into account the ratings fo the show outside the UK to the many markets they sell it to. Surely they are as important as the domestic viewer figures?
Along with River Cottage, Top Gear is about the last bastion that makes Britain look great, there’s not much else coming out of the UK these days that has such pride in itself as a country. Most we see these days tells us Britain’s a stinking pile of festering poo to live in. We used to see loads of British TV that made us want to visit and to live there and that Brits had such pride in the lifestyle. These days Top Gear seems to be the only one standing up and saying British is best – that we outside of Britain gets to see anyway.
I think they needn’t change a thing with the show, it’s superb. If the BBC is stupid enough to cull off this hugely popular show and obvious ‘cash ‘cow then they might as well cull off the BBC as a whole and be done with it. They are not producing much else worthwhile these days anyway,
Churchill quotes should always be handled with care (more than I offered!) as some of his famous speeches exist in several formats being re-delivered – sometimes by an actor – for radio (sometimes after delivery in the House).
For anyone interested the actor who was sometimes called in by the BBC to recite the Churchill speeches was Norman Shelley, who up till that time was most famous for being the first person to play Winnie the Pooh on BBC radio.
As Churchill gave a lot of his speeches to Parliament, and as no recordings were allowed then to be made in the Houses of Parliament, if the BBC wanted to broadcast a political speedch, the speaker was usually asked to come into the studio later and re-read it for the air. However Churchill as PM considered his time too precious and he was not willing to repeat his speeches for radio so he asked the BBC to get someone else to do it. So a few speeches including alledgedly the “We’ll fight them on the beaches” speech were recorded for Norman Shelley. It’s thought some of the speeches Winnie recorded to send to the USA were also actually Shelley. Of course after the war when he had more time Winnie did actually record many of his speeches for posterity. But there are no original Parliamentary speeches by him , only hose recorded shortly after by Shelley or well after the war by Winnie himself. The only wartime speeches which are genuine are those that were done specifcically as a live broadcast on radio or recorded at a live event such as the functions the PM attended at places like the USA, Canada, Harrow, etc.
The real Winston was very pleased with the Shelley recordings apparently. It was of course top secret and few staff ever knew about Shelley standing in. He later revealed the story and most disbelieved him, till after his death when a recording turned up with an official label explaining the speech was Shelley as Churchill. So now its accepted as fact.
Don, interesting stuff. Have you read this awesome kid’s collectible 1940 New Zealand publication about the Battle of Britain? It’s great fun reading the ‘latest gen’ of the day.
http://rnzaf.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=Books&action=display&thread=3963
Looking good so far.
Now that would have been a sight and a half to see, Richard! I hope someone out there can come up with more concrete proof.
I’m sure someone on the NZ forum will have all the dates etc of Beverley visits if you ask there.
See here for a photo of one at Ohakea
http://rnzaf.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=Postwar&thread=7570&page=1
My apologies Webpilot but the report was suspect from the beginning, in that it was the only place reporting this. It would have been big news if it was cancelled (which backburner does not mean at all).
They have been saying filming will start in 2010 for ages now. It’s all scheduled. The Lovely Bones is finished (it had it’s last Premiere today in Wellington), plus other big projects are out of the way, and now the studio is moving onto The hobbit and Dambusters, as has always been reported. Maybe you guys are not getting the full gen up-over?
For the nay-sayers out there, Peter Jackson just appeared on New Zealand’s “Campbell Live” programme being interviewed, and he confirmed that if all goes to plan they start filming for Dambusters in 2010, and he also confirmed (again) that there are currently ten Lancaster replicas sitting in a warehouse in Wellington.
Now – I’ll ask again for goodness sake – can a moderator please change the tabloid-style lying title of this thread?
Adlertag, no the Hudsons in our operational squadrons, and I believe those in other countries, that were not fitted with the Boulton Paul turret still carried the nose gun and ventral gun for self defence. They were operational bombers that simply didn’t have a turret because Britain couldn’t supply enough to the RNZAF.
However the C-63 Transport version, of which several were converted to in 1944, wouldn’t have had any guns I don’t think. Although I’m not certain, maybe the nose gun position was retained. Not much is available on these later war variations sadly.
I agree with Dave Homewood on this was interested to see the interview with Stephen Fry in his link. My ears perked up when Fry said he had visited Peter Jacksons collection of aircraft which included some Lancasters. Does this mean then more have now been built? It seems foolish to invest all this money in building these aircraft to ‘back burner’ the project. I shall remain on the fence on this one until either a) the film is released or b) there is official word from PJ himself.
Martin
From the many reports I have seen , as well as word on the street here, the film has been on the back burner because Mr Jackson has been busy making The Lovely Bones,which has just premiered, and Tintin, which is about to debut. He has other projects on the go too, and the Weta workshops guys have had oodles of work on the go for many films. Getting all their schedules sorted so the appropriate time can be allocated to concentrate on the shooting and post-production must be an immense task, and rather than rushing it and making a bad film, I believe they’re doing the right thing.
However it’s clear they have been working on building the replica aircraft, that is well reported and photos of them have surfaced. They are also apparently sorting out some new filming technology which will likely be used in the making of it, including new 3-D cameras according to reports. Some reports have said that actual filming will likely begin in 2010 sometime.
I would speculate that the online report that started this thread off (which never mentioned cancellation of the project at all!! The thread title should have been changed by a moderator!!) is jumping to conclusions without doing any real research, and many people here have jumped with it.
Stephen Fry talks Peter Jackson, Dambusters and KiwisThu, 26 Nov 2009 4:20p.m.
Along with Prince Charles and Camilla, Peter Jackson’s friend Stephen Fry attended the London premiere of The Lovely Bones this week.
3 News entertainment reporter Kate Rodger caught up with him on the red carpet where he confirmed his project with Jackson, The Dambusters, is pushing ahead.
They also talk about The Lovely Bones, the awful weather, kakapo and New Zealand’s unusual delousing policy.
Watch the full, uncut interview.
Ah, sorry, finger trouble. Fixed now.
Sounds rather like Porco Rosso.
I have not seen that film but on looking at stills from it on Google Image, no. I don’t mean a stock standard cartoon style, I mean proper art that looks like the artworks on this page only animated:
There are some wonderful old clips on this Youtube link advertising one of the Imperial War Museum’s DVD’s.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TsBGPjc8DFE
Do you agree that the catapult officer overseeing the Walrus launch who is glimpsed very quickly in the first film is perhaps Sir Michael Hordern? I’m sure it’s him, and I know he was in the RN in WWII and was already an actor by then, so maybe he was roped in.
Yes, I figured that there were not many actual flyers around, but I’m surprised to hear that all the world’s Swordfish are grounded again. That’s a shame.
Doesn’t the Commemoratie Air Force also have a Swordfish? Someone was talking about having seen one at an airshow recently on the Wix forum.
I think that it would be nice and artixtically interesting if an animated feature film could be made about a FAA carrier squadron, with computer animation but in the style of the lovely detailed fine art paintings that are around, like Robert Taylor’s, etc. I’m sure it would be possible, but likely would be more expensive than actually restoring some real aircraft and CGI generating the rest for a live action film. But imagine how cool it would be, with some good actors as the voices and some great action scenes in animated fine art. This principle could also be applied to many other interesting WWII stories too.
Apart from the Martlet in the FAA Museum at Yeovilton do any genuine Martlets or FAA Wildcats still exist elsewhere or are they all ex-US aircraft?