dark light

Jwcook

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 932 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: F-35A for Japan #2367818
    Jwcook
    Participant

    Yep a five year delay and we have these great Super Hornets to cover it. You make it sound like that five year delay is something terminal.

    Its not five years.

    in reply to: F-35A for Japan #2367839
    Jwcook
    Participant

    The three plus billion the RAAF has spent on 24 Super Hornets has actually saved the Australian Government a large amount of money. Because the last phase of AIR 6000 to acquire a final 24 F-35s to bring the number up to 100 probably won’t happen or if it does not until the mid 2030s. Plus of course the alleviation of ongoing F-111 costs, the need to replace the Hornet centre barrels and the expense of acquiring early F-35s just to have an air worthy fighter in service. The Super Hornet buy was not wasted money. And in return it provides a very advanced strike fighter in service well before the F-35 even if the original 2012 schedule had been possible.

    Using the same logic you could “save” much more by having an all superhornet force.

    The choice of the JSF by the NACC originally was faulty it failed to access the risks of delay, even with its built in fudge factor, they made a big mistake selecting a very immature product, the present situation now proves what many of us said at the time, and despite the whining of the JSF fan club its still not been delivered, its still not a mature aircraft, its not a production aircraft, and it will be 2020 before it stands up in Australia.

    How is that a successful outcome from AIR6000?

    in reply to: F-35A for Japan #2367850
    Jwcook
    Participant

    Do you have any actual reasons to make these claims? The Australian NACC office has kept the RAAF one of the least exposed air forces to the F-35’s development programs

    The Hornet upgrade and the Super Hornet acquisition have proven the NACC’s resilience to the F-35 schedule. If they had gone native on the F-35 as you claim they would be buying 12 LRIP aircraft a year right now to go with the 12 they ordered last year and so on. verbiage.

    So the resilience to the program involved buying billions of dollars worth of interim aircraft? how is that protection from exposure to the JSF schedule.

    I count that extra cost as a huge failure and dressing it up as anything else is preposterous.

    in reply to: F-35A for Japan #2368274
    Jwcook
    Participant

    Maybe something to do with the current financial crisis they find themselves in ? I don’t see what that has to do with the actual aircraft ?

    The financial crisis happened yesterday? :).

    There is a rash of media reports from Italy, all coming in the last day or two, it seems a concerted coordinated effort, I was just wondering who is pushing the agenda there. is it shaping public opinion for an announcement, is it NGO stirring the pot?

    Any Italians want to give me some backgroundexplanations?

    Cheers

    in reply to: F-35A for Japan #2368289
    Jwcook
    Participant

    The Italian press is giving its government a hard time with its intended JSF purchase, several papers have come out saying its ill advised in these austere times.. I wonder what motivated several papers to start saying it all at once?.

    Cheers

    in reply to: F-35A for Japan #2368370
    Jwcook
    Participant

    Tribes: “Flocking to” is not the same as “Have not dumped”.

    Also, those nations signed on at delivery dates, and acquisition and operating costs, that were attractive but not real, and at a point where alternatives appeared equally immature.

    They may well flock off all together if the death spiral doesn’t change real quick.:)

    in reply to: F-35A for Japan #2368372
    Jwcook
    Participant

    Hardly, I’ve never contributed to the JSF debate on either that forum or this one.

    My apologies to you – The sentiment remains the same – just remove the “You” to from the sentence and replace with a “They” . πŸ™‚

    in reply to: F-35A for Japan #2368390
    Jwcook
    Participant

    You lost me there…?

    How many competitions has F-35 lost so far?

    The Japanese were always disposed to a US solution, however they were given a credible alternative in the Eurofighter, thus they were able to wring every possible concession from the JSF offer, something Australia could learn from and they could have gotten some “extra pie” from LM too.

    Re how many competitions has the JSF lost, better question to ask how many production aircraft are serving with the customers as promised 10 years ago…:)and when they will actually be delivered.

    Winning and delivering are two different things, and the former depends on the latter before it can be counted.

    in reply to: F-35A for Japan #2368398
    Jwcook
    Participant

    Japan is not part of the partnership and therefore will not get any contracts that would normally go to the Partner countries. What will happen is that the partner countries that have component contracts will likely see those go up (for the parts not made in Japan) for the entire life of the program (original build and spare parts). Win-Win for everyone.

    So exactly what will the Japanese export for the JSF? (IIRC wings were mentioned)

    What percentage of parts for the JSF are the partners producing? or are other non partners producing a significant % of JSF parts?

    in reply to: F-35A for Japan #2368401
    Jwcook
    Participant

    It certainly reinforces the idea that Eurofighter gave the JSF a good run for its money in Japan, the Japanese were able to extract every last concession from the winning bidder.

    But those concessions may have an impact.

    Things to consider:-
    The Japanese could have relaxed the self imposed ban anyway.

    The preferential treatment of the Japanese may in fact alienate some of the partners who have paid up front and now expect manufacturing contracts, I think the previously stated “best price bidder wins work” isn’t being implemented a fairly as some partners expected, and the large changes that have and are still to come in the program have damaged some relationships.

    There is a caveat in the Japanese order that the delivery’s must commence at a certain date, we shall see if that date is hard and fast or if its a rubbery one like Australia negotiated.
    Plus are the deliveries allowing for a “still work to be done” JSF’s with promised fixes at a later date included in the price or is it a fully working block X delivered on XX/XX/XX remains to be seen.

    Cheers

    in reply to: F-35A for Japan #2368407
    Jwcook
    Participant

    Fair play, I much prefer the moderation style on DefenceTalk because the forum lends itself to a great deal less hysteria and general forum infighting than you get on here.

    Well when only one opinion is allowed of course there is less infighting, I no longer contribute to Defensetalk for that exact reason.

    I notice this forum is full of robust debate, alive and well and…… full of Defensetalk members!, the last post in Defensetalk regarding the JSF was 6 days ago.. Hmmmmm…..< insert tumbleweed image>

    Perhaps that might tell you something – I guessing not

    The banning quoted suggests that people find somewhere else to do it and then you follow them!!, and then have the cheek to hijack the JSF thread and turn it into a I’m holier than thou fest.

    Mods may I suggest – a short ban is in order here to stop the JSF for Japan thread being hijacked by these interlopers who wouldn’t stand for it on the site they are mods for πŸ˜€

    So are we back on topic? if not can you continue it here:
    Tumblweed town
    it has been 6 days after all

    in reply to: MMRCA news thread 10 #2368735
    Jwcook
    Participant

    aSending such a letter NOW (when both bidders are supposed to shut up and wait) is a clear try to shift the process from the way it is supposed to work. That is why it looks so desperate

    Not necessarily, if a validity confirmation (or other instrument as applicable) is required from the vendors, that would fit nicely and no problem, if anything is outstanding today is the last day.

    in reply to: F-35A for Japan #2300993
    Jwcook
    Participant

    JSF will come in on budget, and the international partner version first flight is show below.

    The test pilot is quoted as saying :-

    It turns better than All the 4th gen jets out there.

    Its cheaper to operate than the F-16.

    Lexington institute hails it as a paradigm shift.

    DMO say they couldn’t be happier with their choice.

    And Steven Smith says it vindicates years of waiting.

    Merry Xmas:D

    in reply to: F-35A for Japan #2302085
    Jwcook
    Participant

    Just reading some info on the Japanese deal, I don’t think anyone doubts the strength of the political dimension to this deal.

    How it stacks up to the deal Australia got.

    $114 per aircraft, FACO main wing manufacture etc and if Japan relaxes their arms ban they become a global supplier. thas all i got as my Japanese is restricted to google translate

    Not to bad for a non partner who have requested less than half of the Australian planned buy.

    Looks like Boeing and Eurofighter gave a very very good offer to push the US to that sort of deal.

    in reply to: F-35A for Japan #2302090
    Jwcook
    Participant

    If you don’t understand why don’t you ask under FOI – or is it easier just to get snippy from sidelines?

    Lets see – its quite simple. Ask NACC how the baseline was determined. Its not rocket science even though its far easier to continue to throw grenades as its far better sport.

    As I’m not on JSF or been involved on any evaluations for it so I can’t tell you.

    Let me guess though, you’re not that interested anyway. It would be far too inconvenient to ask for actual detail rather than let the blood run free on the internet. πŸ™‚

    I’m asking here because you ban people for asking those type of questions on website you administer.. and there are more than a few people here who can answer such questions, which begs the question why are you here?

    Or are you just a conduit for the JSF good news team setup by the DMO???;)
    I notice bad news isnt reported on in your usual haunt.

    Did you notice how the JSF schedule wasn’t even commented on in that section of the report? while the preceding and subsequent items were?.. perhaps it was just an oversight, or not a big issue.:)

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 932 total)