dark light

Jwcook

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 932 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Hot Dog's Ketchup Filled F-35 News Thread #2309204
    Jwcook
    Participant

    I thought the British transfered the “special” relationship to France?

    Quite a few countries are transferring their special relationships, I think they are beginning to realise that just having one ‘special’ relationship is not a great idea and that having many relationships gains you far more respect and freedom of action.

    India is a good case in point.

    I suppose that happens when one party doesn’t act as if the relationship is special.

    cheers

    in reply to: Hot Dog's Ketchup Filled F-35 News Thread #2309440
    Jwcook
    Participant

    The UK opposition has released its UK future procurement plans.

    the interesting bit seems to written specifically for the JSF.

    See http://www.labour.org.uk/uploads/43d0e476-3d6e-d4e4-2dbb-00b5a76c19fc.pdf

    see page 54 on.

    UK dependence on a foreign country for crucial elements of its capacity to modify, upgrade and deploy its equipment is, however, problematic. When the UK wishes to deploy its forces, should the Government have to gain the agreement of other countries because of previous supply contracts? And if there is a clash of priorities between the UK and another country’s requirements, should the UK have to take second place?
    3.a.10 Because of these implications for UK freedom of action, we consider that there should be very few occasions where the UK does not develop and maintain the capacity to upgrade and modify its key military equipment and systems. Therefore, all off-shore/’off-the-shelf’ purchases should be subject to a ‘UK control’ test that states that there must be UK-based engineering and upgrade capability in the UK capable of performing UORs on the equipment.
    Where a purchase is made, there should be engineering and design capability which has been developed for related systems and the equipment supplier should provide a trusted onshore capability and not be hindered by the priorities of other countries. The capacity to upgrade and support military systems is an inherent part of UK defence and must not be hindered by a lack of skills or capability to provide support.

    seems there are a few who are not quite happy with the current arrangements.

    Cheers

    in reply to: Hot Dog's Ketchup Filled F-35 News Thread #2310179
    Jwcook
    Participant

    2. The current employer gets a lot of funding from a party who wants F 35 to get positive press.

    Just speculation

    (amended your quote as above)

    Ok lets speculate, you have a reporter who is highlighting things that LM don’t want highlighted, so they become a much bigger monetary source to that reporters employer, and then exert pressure to have him not report on things they want kept quiet.

    Just speculation.

    regards

    BTW an one of the largest Australian suppliers to the JSF went into liquidation recently, not helped by the constant delays and the enormous investments required to ‘compete’ for JSF work.

    source http://www.canberratimes.com.au/news/national/national/general/jsf-delays-ground-aust-parts-maker/2300341.aspx

    There are other companies suffering from the same, not just in Australia – who’s next.

    Cheers

    in reply to: Nice MMRCA News and Discussion 9 #2311884
    Jwcook
    Participant

    Training aircraft do not have to be supersonic, Modern flight controls are designed so there is little difference in flying an aircraft supersonically than at M0.85

    So paying a price premium is hard to justify, unless you want to arm those “training” aircraft for an interceptor role.

    Its al the subsystems that soak up training time and the cheaper that is the better.

    Cheers

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon News & Discussions Thread V #2313361
    Jwcook
    Participant

    how about the the European ones I posted, did each and every single one have a contest?

    Just look for the ones that didn’t…;)

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon News & Discussions Thread V #2313592
    Jwcook
    Participant

    Amerocentric systems in service with Australia 😉

    Your proving my point.. see what happens when you run a competition..:D

    We also bought abrams tanks (FMS no contest)
    JSF no contest
    Seasprite hahahaha
    M113
    M198 howitzer
    Blackhawk
    Chinook
    F18E/F (no contest)
    Hercules,
    C-17
    Boeing 737

    Do I need to go on?

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon News & Discussions Thread V #2313795
    Jwcook
    Participant

    If Australia wants the F-35 then, well so be it, up to them. But if they’re not gauranteeing buying the things over worries on costs then theres at least two other options available that they would be satisfied with. If they put a bullet in the F-35’s head, then why not go for the Typhoon? It’d certainly be a better choice than the F/A-18 the way I see it.

    Sadly for Australia they are very Amerocentric, For Australia the answer is the JSF now what was the question!!.

    There was a competition in 2002, where all but the JSF was turfed out, the Eurofighter because it couldn’t guarantee capability and delivery by 2012. LOL but the JSF could?

    So when the JSF which only existed in powerpoint form won, Eurofighter GmbH was not impressed, and the Dassault exec who was flying over to Oz to open their office only heard about it on landing!!.

    So Oz waited and waited. and were full of praise for the JSF over the last 10 years and it was all fine and dandy… but had to buy Super hornets to cover the shortfall, and are now in the process of looking at a couple of dozen more super hornets and take that from the imagined JSF buy.

    So the Air 6000 “competition” has cost nearly double or treble what Typhoon would have cost, and the group that has been responsible for all this are now under the spotlight for defence procurement mismanagement.

    So no you won’t see Typhoons in Australia not because there not a great choice, but because it would prove incompetence from the top down.

    Cheers

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon News & Discussions Thread V #2314017
    Jwcook
    Participant

    now that really is optimistic!

    Ah Yes I see what you mean – do you think till the JSF arrives in ~2040 is better or is that still too optimistic?:diablo:

    Cheers

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon News & Discussions Thread V #2314065
    Jwcook
    Participant

    Everyone is being very tight lipped about this deal…

    There not much to go on just circumstantial evidence, but the long lead items will have to start about 18 months before aircraft are put together, equipment for putting these long lead items such as 5 axis lathes, bore sighting equipment, autoclaves have to be ordered about now.

    So look for Dassault or Eurofighter partners ordering large industrial equipment.

    You’d think the UK would have enough bore sight equipment in light of their reluctance to buy tranche 3b, so its interesting news that means either there are unexpected maintenance issues with the UK fleet requiring such a large order or there are some anticipated exports.

    Perhaps the USAF want a couple of hundred bargain Typhoons as a stop gap measure till the JSF arrives in ~2030 😀

    Cheers

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon News & Discussions Thread V #2314192
    Jwcook
    Participant

    I thought Link-16 had its own encryption standards, besides would this new encryption be compatible with export customers network ?

    Yes and the new Cassidian encryption doesn’t require US personnel to be present to load the software!!,

    caveat – unless your working in a coalition that requires the codes.

    Cheers

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon News & Discussions Thread V #2314397
    Jwcook
    Participant

    Hmmm maybe I am. But, there just seems a lot of news coming out all of a sudden when theres a huge deal due to be announced any time now – coincidence maybe.

    How about this news

    “AAI Test & Training’s ABE(R) Selected for Eurofighter Typhoon EF-2000 Boresighting $2.2 Million Award Includes Three Systems for the Royal Air Force ”

    “ABE is a gyro-stabilized, electro-optical angular measurement system designed to align aircraft subsystems. Because the ABE system supports concurrent maintenance and does not require aircraft to be jacked and leveled during the boresight procedure, both depot- and operational-level users can maintain schedules and reduce phase maintenance costs. These features also support increased manufacturing throughput for original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs.

    Now The Eurofighter consortium has 18 of these already, and they are long lead items, and by a strange coincidence and increase of 3 units to the 18 original would be a 16% increase

    Now in a totally unrelated matter:rolleyes: the number of contracted Eurofighters is 707 if you add the possible 126 unit Indian deal its 833 a 17% increase.

    Coincidence????;)

    cheers

    Jwcook
    Participant

    Interesting question along the lines of “if you tape some buttered toast to a cats back and drop them which side lands on the ground?”

    As everyone knows that buttered toast always lands buttered side down and cats always land on their feet the answer is simple – they will rotate 10cm off the ground until the cat dies or the butter flies off the toast.

    Source :- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buttered_cat_paradox

    The real answer should be that the F-22 would be able to detect another F-22 radar as it knows the exact algorithms that make the LPI radar a LPI radar and would predictively look in the right bands.

    Cheers

    PS no toast, cats or tape was harmed in this post..

    in reply to: Nice MMRCA News and Discussion 9 #2369885
    Jwcook
    Participant

    but I have a hard time believing that EF hasn´t offered India a better price than Saudi Arabia payed BAE.

    The offer of being a partner means there a 7% reduction as the consortium can’t sell planes cheaper to export customers, partners are different.

    cheers

    in reply to: Strange plane in Australia #574704
    Jwcook
    Participant

    http://img395.imageshack.us/img395/9356/tagwemuwithussocom2xc.jpg

    in reply to: Strange plane in Australia #574708
    Jwcook
    Participant

    Ah after a bit of searching it appears to be a mock 747 with 2 engines, but recent work commissioned by the defence dept for SASR has extended the upper deck ( A380 ish).

    So its an anti terorist training mockup I think.

Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 932 total)