The point is the F-35 is designed to live and even thrive in a High Threat Enviroment.
Scooter you put great store in the Stealth characteristics of the JSF, so much in fact that you say a confrontation with a Eurocanard is a forgone conclusion.
Why not put the same amount of faith in a towed decoy or active radar stealth?
If I was to put as much faith in those systems the poor JSF wouldn’t stand a chance!
Every target disappears from its sensors as active radar jamming starts and any missiles blindly fired would be harmlessly seduced by a towed decoy if it was lucky enough to be fired in the right direction…..
I think you would find that any potential JSF adversary would not play the JSF’s game by cavorting around the sky blasting radar waves everywhere while waiting for inbound missiles.
They would use their superior speed and agility (I assume you are willing to concede the JSF is inferior in these areas) as their leverage.
The Typhoon with its radar swashplate design can break from the merge earlier and with the longer ranged missiles would easily put the JSF at a distinct disadvantage. (note the Swashplate design is at the same stage as the JSF:))
You use the JSF stealth as a mitigation of this, however how does the JSF find the Eurocanards??? it must transmit unless it uses passive IRST, but then the forward looking Pirate has better resolution and arcs of view for AtoA so advantage with the Eurocanard.
I’m a little confused as to why you say the JSF is superior, can you explain its tactics against the Eurocanards and the methods it would use to target and prosecute a Eurocanard?. (just a paragraph or two explaining this ‘invincible’ tactic).
Cheers
Aren’t bulkheads amongst the longest lead items the plane has?
LM claimed that testing is not so important because their mighty simulation programs replace most of the actual testing…
On the other hand, presumibly those tests are very hard on the parts. 1500 hours could well give the same fatigue as 15000 hours of normal service life
mmmhhh… maybe…
If 1500 = 15000 real hours it would not have failed.. it would have passed:).
It simply should not have failed.. if LM are right with their engineering then the rig must be at fault because the simulations say it should have done well over 8000 hours.
To have failed so early in its test phase points to a rig failure to correctly emulate the conditions of real flight.
If its not the rigs fault… Errrr – Oh dear!!
Norway (~50?), Denmark (~50?), Netherlands (80+?), Turkey (100+?) and probably some others I have missed.
You forgot Australia 100 and Israel 20…
Remember these figures are subject to large variances (downward:))
And how many export orders has the Typhoon taken from the JSF..
~700ish give or take a few dozen……:), and those 700 are contracted.
When they did that in the war of independence you called them heroes!!:diablo:
I would welcome France and the UK cooperating, the previously mentioned Concorde is the prime example… Fantastic…
Cheers
The Rafale/Mac analogy is good — however I believe that also the Typhoon is more analogus to a Mac than a PC.
Mac??? – IIRC the Tiffy does have a few ruggedised G4 or G5’s in the DASS… however I still think the Tiffy is definitely the PC, the Rafale looks too pretty to be a PC…;)
once you start looking there are many more parallels.. 🙂
Cheers
Oops! Missed the best!
Are we talking human with fully functional mice brains or
is a given country’s TeeVee about to elect a govt for a
people that believes that there are mice with……………….?Welcome to the Douglas Adams watch team, mate!
Douglas Adams is wonderful… but he used a Apple Macintosh to write HHGTTG, which makes me think that the argument between Rafale and Typhoon is very like the Mac vs PC arguments, they basically do the same job but the Mac costs more, looks better and only used by a niche market, whereas the PC is cheaper, used by many and looks a lot more utilitarian.. you can decide which one is the Mac and PC!!..
LOL
Cheers
Just for balance…this is the same country that may be about to elect people to government who on national tv, claim that mice are being breed with “fully functioning human brains.”
btw it’s spelt whether…
And apparently vice versa..:)
Sorry for dragging up a post from a page or two back but I cant resist.
The larger AESA array, the higher the cost…
Most likely the Typhoon will not have the maximum number of T/R elements it can physically carry.
Ah but will it have more than the 1500 the F-22 has??.
I think 1400 had been mentioned earlier, but studies into sparse arrays may have paid dividends
Its sad news indeed and the investigation into what happened during take off will hopefully determine the cause and prevent further incidents.
My thoughts are with the pilots family and friends.
regards
John
hi,
just coming back to this after the birth of my second son :D,
Congratulations…
Soon to be followed by anonymous allegations of kickbacks, cancellation and re-tender. Fightergate, here we come!:(
This is modern India – not some third world country that can’t even manage a tanker competition that’s fair…:dev2:
Regards
Just to reiterate the earlier point I made that cost was originally a criteria in the downselect of FJCA. F-35B was the cheapest whole-life solution at that time figuring in carrier recurring costs. There is no reason to believe that anything has changed.
Except the cost bit…
hello JWcook,
i think that if the tornados are doomed then typhoon is going to have to live up to its full capability. bright adder looks like it relates to an electronic attack Typhoon for the RAF alone right?
i think i was just trying to say that the 2 countries that will operate the typhoon and f35 together will mainly use the typhoon for a2a missions rather than the f35.
but then of course, it seems i have very little understanding of stealth and such doohickies, so you will have to excuse me if i am gibbering in a clueless fashion…
Your not gibbering at all, that’s the plan right there, but if the Typhoon has enhanced AtoG modes and Electronic Attack, then the need for the F-35 diminishes..
So look for drastic reductions in numbers purchased vs the original plans.. of ~150 UK JSF!! not a chance.
I reckon around 75 (at most) if the carrier survives and the new government is feeling generous, so look for a firm commitment of ~40 from the UK if all goes well with the program in the next year or so.
Cheers
i can’t see the RAF swapping the Typhoon for the F35 in the air defence role.
The operators of those types clearly see one as better than the other in the A2A role.
Conversely look at “Bright Adder” the UK are funding for the Eurofighter Typhoon, that focuses on the Air to Ground modes for the the Typhoon, that seems to be more telling than you’d think.
Cheers
looks like a wing stall…:o
But if you look closely at the starboard engine… is that out?