dark light

striker

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Next generation ARM ? #1788882
    striker
    Participant

    From Jane’s Defence News Briefs:

    USAF reveals airborne live-firing trials of ramjet missile
    Airborne live-firing trials have been revealed of a hitherto unseen United States ramjet-powered air-to-surface weapon. Under the Higher-Speed Anti-radiation missile Demonstration (HSAD) programme, ATK and the US Navy (USN) have combined a ramjet motor with the dual-mode seeker developed for the AGM-88E advanced anti-radiation guided missile (AARGM). The HSAD is a parallel effort to the other various SEAD (suppression of enemy air defences) systems evolving in the US today.

    in reply to: Next generation ARM ? #1788908
    striker
    Participant

    I’m a bit curious of the publication of the picture. Strange that it’s not flagged as a great new developement by some, private or military.

    Looking at QF-4 statistics from AFM for some years, one would think that testing would be done on a F-18 instead of a QF-4G, based on risk asessments.

    Could the primary reason be that this could be a low-risk experimental weapon system for dealing with threats like S-400 or similar ?

    in reply to: Next generation ARM ? #1788951
    striker
    Participant

    A QF-4G Wild Weasel on a one way mission……..
    A long range missile that doesn’t fit into a stealthy weapons bay……

    A lot of interresting questions arise when we couple it to modern russian SAM systems.

    in reply to: Next generation ARM ? #1788955
    striker
    Participant

    Based on the picture and this, http://www.mbda-systems.com/mbda/site/FO/scripts/newsFO_complet.php?lang=EN&news_id=224 , could it be that they took technology from the MBDA Meteor program and applied it to the AGM-88E ?

    Why would they show it on the QF-4, and not on a F-18 ?

    striker
    Participant

    Norwegian national TV, NRK, disclosed new information about radar plots from the Norwegian radar station in Honningsvåg.

    The radar plots were classified for a long period, but pressure from the Norwegian parlament, Stortinget, resulted in a release of the plots in 1997. Standard operations procedure was to avoid logging of allied intelligence flights in the easter parts of Finmark, close to the russian border.

    Several contacts in the plots from the Honningsvåg radar was classified as “Zoombie”-contacts (Unknown). One contact was flying over the Kola peninsula, while another was 200 nm east of the Widerøe crash site. NRK have recently found declassified information indicating that the contact 200 nm east of the Widerøe crash site was in fact a RC-135W from Mildenhall, while the contact flying over the Kola Peninsula was a SR-71, also from Mildenhall.

    If this information are correct, an intelligence gathering mission was taken place in the area.

    None of the information above has ever been published by the previous 2 Mehamn inquiry commissions.

    The question about the 2-ship Harriers flying in the area of the accident has not been solved. But given the secrecy around the above mentioned military flights in the area, a low-level probing flight towards the russian border does not seem unlikely.

    The Norwegian military intelligence have confirmed that flights of this type was taking place the same week, but were unable to confirm dates.
    http://www.nrk.no/programmer/tv/brennpunkt/4242522.html

    For scandinavian readers:
    http://www.nrk.no/programmer/tv/brennpunkt/4241535.html
    http://www.nrk.no/programmer/tv/brennpunkt/4245870.html

    striker
    Participant

    Norwegian national TV, NRK, disclosed new information about radar plots from the Norwegian radar station in Honningsvåg.

    The radar plots were classified for a long period, but pressure from the Norwegian parlament, Stortinget, resulted in a release of the plots in 1997. Standard operations procedure was to avoid logging of allied intelligence flights in the easter parts of Finmark, close to the russian border.

    Several contacts in the plots from the Honningsvåg radar was classified as “Zoombie”-contacts (Unknown). One contact was flying over the Kola peninsula, while another was 200 nm east of the Widerøe crash site. NRK have recently found declassified information indicating that the contact 200 nm east of the Widerøe crash site was in fact a RC-135W from Mildenhall, while the contact flying over the Kola Peninsula was a SR-71, also from Mildenhall.

    If this information are correct, an intelligence gathering mission was taken place in the area.

    None of the information above has ever been published by the previous 2 Mehamn inquiry commissions.

    The question about the 2-ship Harriers flying in the area of the accident has not been solved. But given the secrecy around the above mentioned military flights in the area, a low-level probing flight towards the russian border does not seem unlikely.

    The Norwegian military intelligence have confirmed that flights of this type was taking place the same week, but were unable to confirm dates.
    http://www.nrk.no/programmer/tv/brennpunkt/4242522.html

    For scandinavian readers:
    http://www.nrk.no/programmer/tv/brennpunkt/4241535.html
    http://www.nrk.no/programmer/tv/brennpunkt/4245870.html

    striker
    Participant

    Mehamn inquiry in London

    From norwegian national newspaper Verdens Gang, http://www.vg.no http://www.vg.no/pub/vgart.hbs?artid=238450

    The norwegian Mehamn inquiry commission has been the green light to have an inquiry about the Mehamn accident in London. The commander of the Royal Air Force No.1 squadrion at the time of the acccident, Sir Peter Squire, will let himself be questioned by the commision. The Mehamn inquiry commission are now recieving help from british authorities in finding several of the pilots based at Tomsø Langnes airport during the NATO exercise Alloy Express in 1982.

    It’s not known if the inquiry in London will be an open inquiry, as all inquiries in Norway have been.

    (Sorry for the bad translation)

    in reply to: The best ASW Helo #2679408
    striker
    Participant

    The sensors, weapons and endurance + all weather capability should be what matters, if availability is about equal among the different modern types.

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)