dark light

echonine

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 723 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Lebanon to get 10 MiG-29s. #2465585
    echonine
    Participant

    Looking at the wikipedia page for the MiG-29SMT, I saw that the MiG-29 has many incarnations, however they all seem to offer the same improvements (Multirole capability, more fuel, better sensors etc.). What would be the difference between a MiG-29SMT and say, a MiG-29M?

    The MiG-29M is a whole new MiG-29 line.

    The MiG-29SMT is basically older airframes that are upgraded to the SMT standard. The “M” in “SMT” is more for modernize/multirole, the “T” is for Toplevo aka Fuel in Russian. It’s a multi-stage upgrade.

    Basically, the SMT can carry almost the entire Russian A2G Arsenal, with a larger payload than the baseline model, and has upgraded internal fuel space for longer range. The SMT model uses the Zhuk-M/ME.

    in reply to: 10 new Su-34 at NAPO assembly-line?? #2466684
    echonine
    Participant

    Why not? Serial production launched earlier this year.

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part-3 #1783923
    echonine
    Participant

    I think the converted typhoon should be capable of carying externally attached DSRV aft of sail for Special ops and cruise missile forward of sail , they can carry a combination of Kh-555/101 in VLS tubes.

    Should be a good options against nations/organisation indulging in terror activities and for war on terror.

    I am glad they are not being dismantled and being put to use , it will be nice to see these great monsters sailing the World Ocean once again.

    This leaves – 2 or 3 in potential service?

    I imagine that a Tu-160/Tu-95MS could do the job just fine with anti-terror strikes given Russia’s position on the world map though. Although I guess a permanent station would give the sub a good position for the job too.

    in reply to: Vikramaditya Part 2 #2053976
    echonine
    Participant

    Quite sweet. Guess what, according to your own logic, neither India has left its military programs with Russia. That logically means, they, too, feel they are not being ripped off, right?.. 😎

    LOL….

    Sigh… 🙂

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part-3 #1783929
    echonine
    Participant

    As I correctly predicted on here months ago in the face of fanboy opposition from the likes of echonine.

    Awesome trolling fanboylawrence.

    Kind of like you bantering people about how the Bulava was NOT a modified SS-27, which it is. :rolleyes: Sad double standards you set.

    You wouldn’t be able to quote me saying they should carry SLBMs, merely that they shouldn’t be scrapped – which seems possible if you even read the article. An Ohio style cruise missile carrier isn’t out of the question, which would be interesting with something like the Kh-101 which is planned for the Yasen.

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part-3 #1783941
    echonine
    Participant

    Could be one possibility , but I think in this age of software controlled system , a software lock is a easy way to achieve the desired result.

    Could just be a replaceable part – like warhead – only instead it’s the booster component itself – which has less fuel for example.

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part-3 #1783947
    echonine
    Participant

    Ah nice , I was wondering what that cruise missile was turns out to be a LACM variant of Klub , so the Iskander system combines both Ballistic Missile and Cruise missle.

    I wonder how they achieve that 450 Km extended range ,compared to the 290 Km range of Iskander-E , dimensionally i dont see any change in the dimension of missile ( ditto goes for Klub )

    So the only way they may do this at the cost of warhead.

    The other option atleast from Klub experience of IN is they have a software lock , which restricts the range of Klub missile to under MTCR , remove the lock and you have a much higher range , ofcourse these are only with the Russian to unlock it 😉

    Range difference might be something simple like amount of rocket fuel?

    in reply to: Vikramaditya Part 2 #2054411
    echonine
    Participant

    Unlike you I will keep this thread on topic.

    Side argument gets hosed, you get out of it. Not unlike you.

    An excellent and factualy answer actually. Perhaps you could tell us how much military shipbuilding went on in Russia between between the end of the 1980’s and now?:rolleyes:

    Ha ha ha . . . right. So you are suggesting all forms of engineering did stop. What garbage. Just because carriers and cruisers weren’t built, doesn’t mean that there aren’t plenty of engineers to go around.

    in reply to: Manouverbility not as obsolete as i thought! #2468596
    echonine
    Participant

    Not only that but people seem to forget that in order to know when to manuever (even if it’s just a desperation turn at the last second) you have to actually know where the missile is. And trying to see an itty-bitty object coming in at roughly a mile every second or two with a burned out or smokeless motor? Good luck.

    This is what RWR is for. Your enemy’s missile’s isn’t going to fly around the world to get you in the rear end 😉

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread Part II #2054624
    echonine
    Participant

    I do not know which posts you have been reading but I have never seen anyone on this forum criticizing Putin for cracking down on corruption.

    This involves criticism of putting big name billionaires behind bars, privatization, etc.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread Part II #2054632
    echonine
    Participant

    Were you attempting to be sarcastic? The fact is that corruption is crippling the Russian Armed Forces.

    Most people here and on other forums criticized Putin, when he was president, for cracking down so hard on corrupt govt. officials all over.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread Part II #2054640
    echonine
    Participant

    Not to mention the rampant corruption that absorbs a large proportion of the budget. 2.2billion Rubles in the first 9 months of this year alone, a truly shocking state of affairs.

    http://en.rian.ru/russia/20081202/118637765.html

    Now maybe you can figure out why Putin is trying so hard to fight corruption in whatever way possible?

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread Part II #2054643
    echonine
    Participant

    The defense budget may be larger, but you have to consider that a lot of the money is going to the Strategic Rocket Forces to continue Topol-M acquisition and RS-24 development. Lots of acquisition programs to continue funding as well, like the Su-34 and the Dolgorukiy class SSBN.

    Don’t forget that the re-armament plan budget has allocated 20 – 25% to the Navy. That’s approx 50 / 250 billion. Not pocket change I assure you.

    in reply to: Manouverbility not as obsolete as i thought! #2468869
    echonine
    Participant

    It works very well against a cooperating target, but that shortcut becomes contraproductive if the target changes direction within the turn.

    Most BVR kills so far has been against pilots who has been totally unaware that they were chased by a missile. Against an enemy with modern radar and missile warners that wont be so easy.

    I agree. The calculation isn’t that instantaneous. If the targeted pilot starts pulling circles and changing course, things get a little more complicated.

    in reply to: Vikramaditya Part 2 #2054709
    echonine
    Participant

    Given the beslan performance serious questions have to be asked about the quality of the Russian special forces but this is hardly the thread.

    I forgot that the Russian spec ops wired the roof and killed all those poor people. :rolleyes: Oh wait, it wasn’t them was it? Not to mention no spec ops group has ever had to face a situation so dire.

    You clearly have no idea what you are on about. Of course they were not all veterans but a very high proportion were and they passed their skills down to the next generation. This has not happened in Russia for two decades.

    And stop making false accusations of racism.

    So engineering halted for 20 years. Yeah right. 😀 Good argument there.

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 723 total)