With all due respect I do not know where to start in commenting about your post.
Because you spew the same BS all the time. It must have gotten old for you too.
You are pontificating about a paper airplane to this point with virtually nothing but conjecture to base your opinions on.
Paper airplane to you, but not the people to whom it matters at this point. As you seem to agree with below.
Can you not see how much of your time you are wasting in your PAK/FA boasts when no one outside of the design bureau has even a clue as to how the aircraft will look and perform?
That’s good. That gives the competition less time to come up with something better. Pogosyan has already stated that he wasn’t impressed with the F-22 in terms of aerodynamic performance. Considering more if known about the F-22 than the T-50, Pogosyan and his 1000+ engineers have targets to exceed. Warning: Mind boggling logic here. :rolleyes:
Furthermore your faith in the state of the art Russian radar and ECM gear is again without proof just conjecture.
Where is yours in the stuff of the F-22? Thin air?
An AESA version of the Irbis will exceed the F-22’s APG-77 in terms of raw performance by far, and unless you can prove otherwise, I don’t want to hear it, as the numbers speak for themselves. – Allowing “Irbis-AESA” to be far less prone to jamming and lets the PAK-FA be even safer in terms of combat vs 4 and 4+ gen fighters. Against the F-22/F-35 it just allows it to detect them from farther.
I am sure Sukhoi will be building a competitive fighter that will perform well and push the Russian state of the art. But until it is more than a source of rumour and conjecture on message boards stop wasting your time.
This thread is created for the purpose of discussion, which is mostly about how crap the PAK-FA is at this point and how great the F-35 and F-22 are. :rolleyes:
Sign In
