Yeah, god forbid freedom of speech on a forum.
Out of curiosity where did 0.00001 sqm come from?
It’s the marble SOC, the flying marble. :rolleyes:

Or killing the other fighter way before you can see the white of the eye of the pilot. That is what F-22 and F-35 are designed for.
Being superior in a dogfight is one thing, but getting there in the first place is another issue.
By the way: the Eurofighter is even better in all terms of performance than the Suchoi 35, and different to that aircraft was tested against the F-22. Results are classified I guess, but so much is known: when it gets to knife fight the advantages of EM-stealth are gone.
How is the EF better than the Su-35? LOL.
This should be good.
Price? No. (Russian vs West, no brainer)
Maneuverability? No. (3D TVC is pretty killer)
Weapons package and payload? No. (No need to elaborate)
Range? LOL?
Radar power possibility? Not even comparable.
ECM package possibility? Not even comparable.
Maybe you could explain how being able to understand Russian would make this statement less retarded?
“By virtue of size alone the new Sukhoi jet will be superior in terms of performance and capability.”
(This should be good 😉 )
Not this, merely your debunking of Russian sources and videos/interviews on the matter, because you clearly don’t understand the language making you a terribly misinformed member on many Russian military topics. That is all. :rolleyes: And a dreamy, delusional fanboy at that, who omits what he doesn’t like and accepts what he does.
[color=red]So intelligence is directly related to ethnicity? +1 points for that one.
You’d all do well to start discussing things in a civil manner and refrain from the immature slagging matches you’re starting to get fond of again around here.
[/color]
What are you kidding me SOC? If he can’t understand Russian, which is what was implied, then clearly he doesn’t know half of the crap that Russian speakers do. Nothing to do with intelligence. Rather lack of understanding. Call it intelligence if you want, but don’t complain about him not speaking Russian.
You are hardly making a case. Russia is taking its time because it hasn’t had the resources and why it had to enlist India to join the programm. As for my signature. That doesn’t make my case weaker or yours stronger. What we do know is LM has had the resources and technolgy. Russia has not…………
Your making wild claims without even a once of facts.
Where is India in all this? Other than some future potential buy that’s not even related to the one for the RuAF?
Now go whine more about how 25% less RCS is going to win-win every time. :rolleyes:
Especially in the stealth dept. Russia has NEVER flown a stealth aircraft. Not a one. (Slapping RAM on a conventional aircraft doesn’t make it a stealth aircrft). The US has flown nearly (if not more than) two dozen types of stealth vehicles over the last 40 years. Actually FLOWN the hardware. To think that Russia is going to eclipse that on their first go is hilarious.
LO isn’t a new concept. Wake up.
You don’t think it’s retarded to judge capability and performance purely on size alone? (And someone’s CLAIM at that.) The ONLY thing KNOWN (vs fanboy fantasies) at this time is the name. Everything else is speculation.
You know nothing and that is evident since you are not Russian. The PAK-FA thread has a link to an interview with Pogosyan and information on what Sukhoi has released including a picture of the cockpit simulator. Go read up.
That in some cases is true. But how many times does one need to do it, before it becomes more expensive than an engine that lasts longer. 🙂 If we take the Mig-23 as an example it becomes ludicrus how many engines they go through in their life time. Thats if I remember the figures correctly.
That’s because those MiG-23s were designed for WAR, in other words, not to be around long.
The PAK-FA hasn’t even flown or even seen in the Public nor does Russia have experience in Stealth. While LM has decades…………and who would claim Russia is the equal of the West let alone the US in Electronic, Avionics, and Powerplants. Really, you are making some very big leaps with little to back it up………………….
Exactly. They are taking their time to build the jet to ensure it can rival its best competitor.
Electronics? Russian designers pretty much run Samsung with their ideas?
Avionics? I wonder who designed the first used PESA radar, who currently possesses some of the most potent ECM systems, etc.
Powerplants? The 2nd engine to power the PAK-FA will have 40,000lbs of thrust, that’s 5,000 more than the F-22.
What do you have to disprove anything I’ve said with concrete evidence? Even BEFORE I replied with the latter.
This was some news of Mig developing a single engine of 5th Gen Fighter by Piotr Butowski
Since he is a reliable person in such affairs , where does Mig stand with respect to this project ?
More conflicting BS about the T-50’s size? :confused:
Didn’t an official state it was a heavy fighter?
Unless they managed to fit 8 tons of weapons aboard a smaller plane. . . as that figure was quoted in the youtube video / interview.
The US Military has a requirement alone for between one and two thousand F-35’s. That of course doesn’t even count the thousands need for the export maket! Just look at the types that are ending there service lives in the next 10-20 years. (i.e. F/A-18’s, F-16’s, F-15’s, A-10’s, AV-8’s, Mirage 2000’s, Mirage F-1’s, F-5’s, F-4’s, Mig-21’s, Mig-23’s, Mig-29’s, etc. etc. etc.) Really, the F-35 is going to sell easily in the thousands………..;)
We know all about the US requirements . . . and what they actually end up paying for especially recently.
Personally, I doubt the PAK-FA will be superior to the F-35 even if it is cheaper. Second, who would purchase it regardless except possibly China, India or Venezuela??? Really, a non-starter……..
Well, many doubt the capabilities of the F-35 and Russia has little experience in Stealth vs the US. So, why should we believe the PAK-FA would be so capable???
The only rival for the T-50 will be an F-22. This has been stated even by Pogosyan.
By virtue of size alone the new Sukhoi jet will be superior in terms of performance and capability. They are indeed building a jet to counter the F-22, and they are doing it at a later stage in time, which means its on board systems (like engines) will be superior. An AESA IRBIS type would be very powerful.
Pretty hilarious how any edge of LO on this forum means that the jet with the advantage is better, disregarding everything else.
Hey, I’m just floating an idea (albeit a bit extreme/worst of the worst case scenarios). I mean stranger things have happened- who’d have thought 18months ago US sub-prime mortgage fallout would lead to near global financial meltdown?
Let’s look at a better case scenario, as per bring_it_on above: cuts in numbers acquired which will bloat unit costs to well over $100m (today’s prices, note probable sustained $ recovery)-either way potential customers will look to more cost effective alternatives- maybe Boeing still considers the SH as offering considerable growth potential, Eurocanards & Su-35 may join the fray- dare I say it maybe even PAK-FA-MK(X)?!
The PAK-FA will likely beat the F-35 in price anyway, which means if its exported, it will be a prime choice for most countries who would buy from Russia, even in a slightly downgraded version.
The -Es are gonna get AESAs at some point, along with 173 -Cs.
Even in it’s current configuration though, I haven’t seen any complaints about the performance of the APG-70.
Good luck with that with the funding cuts.