You do realise Echo that the satellites you list are all optical reconsats?. Taking Resurs as representative it has a maximum swath depth of 40km!. You think its a practical idea to sweep the South China Sea or any other large body of water in strips 40km wide at a time???.
The last US-P satellite launched was allegedly old stock that was refurbished and wasnt fully operational on orbital insertion. I therefore doubt there are ready stocks of ocean recon sats ready to launch ‘at fairly short notice’.
The Legenda system, of which the US-PU deorbited in Feb was the last vestige of, is, apparently, being replaced by something called Liana which will be a passive-RF only capability that seems shrouded in mystery as to whether its even been scheduled for launch yet.
Currently, according to NASA, there are no Russian naval reconsats in orbit.
NASA? Possibly the last people to know about what the Russians have up there.
What are the 60-70 recon sats that are up there then? Surely they can not all be photorecon sats, or communication satellites.
As a side note, I’m quite possitive 1 or 2 of the satellites I mentioned earlier have some electronic form or recon. If you can’t elaborate, I could try to find the sources.
Given the loation of the spare ammoes in the turrent ring, that is what usually happens with T-64/72/80/90 series of tanks when they get knocked out. If the muntion which hits the tank ignates the powder of the spare ammoes, the turret pops up like a corq.
Yeah, but then again, when was the last time there was any significant ATGM action done against other tanks?
I think you didn’t understand me man.I meant the cockpit is same but in my opinion the joystick’s position will be different.Not the center of the LCD displays,on the right of the pilot like su-37 demonstrator and most of the USAF aircrafts.
Why? What do US aircraft and a testbed not relevant to the PAK-FA have to do with the Su-35BM and PAK-FA, which are quite related.
( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zCiVKJ5VjE4 ) All pictures in this video are about Su-35 simulator and about the test of the new Su 35 aircraft.But I don’t understand what are they talking about.And I think the biggest difference between PAK-FA and Su-35’s cockpits will be the joystick aircraft controller.At PAK-FA it wont be at the center of the cockpit displays, it will be on the right of the pilot.And I hope we can see a new cockpit like F-35’s one big glass cockpit.But it seems impossible.
And you are getting this from where? Do you speak a word of Russian?
Because I do, and Mikhail Pogosyan has stated that the Su-35(BM) is testing PAK-FA “cockpit tech” for lack of a better translation.
The US-A series was discontinued in the mid-80’s and was the nuclear-powered version. It was the loss of that capability that crippled the Legenda targetting system that might just have seen the P-500’s and P-700’s become viable anticarrier weapon.
The US-P (as well as the follow on US-PU/PM vehicles) wasn’t nuclear and was a pure passive ELINT bird that relied on the US group emitting on something powerful and recognisable to track it. I say was because the last one de-orbited without replacement in February!.
Satellites finding a carrier……hahahaha π
You do realize that if they had a dire need for satellite targeting all of sudden, the Russians could probably launch a number of satellites of fairly short notice?
Also, the US-P family of satellites is now being replaces by the likes of Persona/Kobalt-M/Resurs-DK.
At the moment, Russia is operating approx. 60-70 recon sats. Probably mostly of classified nature.
Yuschenko is a retard . . .
What’s his objective in US ass kissing?
Get the Americans to pay for the Russian gas the Ukraine uses?
:rolleyes:
The SS-21 / Chechen civilian casualty stories come from ONE story really . . .
When the Russians decided to blow up an “arms bazaar” as they put it, in the middle of Grozny.
The dull journalist said about 8 tons of payload, not an official representatives. Journalists also claimed about 3000 km/h.
He said “that’s all the builders are telling us now”
So yeah, I’m sure he just made that all up – a big conspiracy. :rolleyes:
0:30 – 0:37
What are you going to use to find the carrier?
The fact that you think they’d need to speaks volumes.
You still have to get them in the basket. How you going to do that?
If they had satellites and the CVN was transmitting. And if they could be guided by satellites (they can’t- the subs could receive info from a satellite system that doesn’t exist amymore AFAIK but the missiles could never send or receive with the satellites). Helos? ROFLMAO!!!! Yeah I’m sure a helo sitting within radar range of a carrier is going to last long.
You come across as being more interested in argueing than learning (and learn you need to do). I don’t know why Jonsey even wastes his time with you.
Finding the carrier has been discussed now.
AND
. . . my bad, I woke up the other day and forgot that helos were put on ships just for fun. . . :rolleyes: I mean who would think they could be used for guidance assistance. . .
This isn’t about fanboys or not – all I am saying is 122 + Raptors are delivered vs 0 operational Su-35s. But on a side note – of course the F-22 is not leaving home – Russia and the US are not at war are they?
With regard to the Patriot SAM – surely you have realised by now – after Russia have lost 4 – 10 jets to a Georgian ADS – that having ARMs in service wouldn’t prevent the RuAF from having a torrid time against a Patriot type system – in a non nuclear conflict. π
You do realize that the BUK (SA-11) is perfectly suited for Georgia’s rough terrain, with extreme mobility.
Good luck with the Patriot there. π
122 vs 0
The Raptor isn’t leaving home, no matter how much the fan boys think it is.
One loss of the jet, and the security compromise would be immense.
P.S
I must say β I am surprised by the various amount of older equipment still being used by the Russian (from the news footage I have seen!), in the likes of T-62 MBT, what with all the more modern and more advanced MBT designs like the T-72 and T-80βs the Russianβs must have. And then there were the old true and trusty BM-21 βGradβsβ.
I thought that the Russians would have been keen to use and demonstrate their latest weapons β for operational evaluation
And more importantly for Russia at this time its potential export sales value!
Then again this area was classed as a Category 2/3 area by the Soviets.
In the end a tank is a tank, if you are a baggy assed, poorly equipped and trained Georgian soldier!!
And you wonder why people don’t have a clue sometimes.
The T-64s belong to the Abkhazian/South Ossetian forces.
Both the Grad and Uragan systems were fielded – why would Russia only bring up new, expensive weapons, when they walked over Georgia in days with their less-advanced kit? Something they knew they could do.
From reading this thread it really is disturbing, that much like the current hopeless US government, people here (and other places) seem to think that Medvedev, Putin, and the Russian govt. are the reincarnation of the Bolsheviks – for lack of a better way to put it. . . When you have a country with break-away republics, that then engages your own peacekeepers/people, who would expect Russia to stay calm? Should they ask the UN for help? While they get bombed? I mean if Russia is so evil, why didn’t they take over Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan – why don’t they even have problems with those states – since I mean – the “Bolsheviks” are back? Oh and get this – the worst decision of all. In this situation, the US could pick Russia or Georgia. Who, would, for whatever reason, pick Georgia over Russia? You think the US is going to get ANYTHING done in Iran now? Haha, yeah right!
Patriots will give any Russian AC a torrid time.
I’d believe you if they didn’t design a variety of anti-radiation missiles to counter the system years ago.
What “invincible America talk”? Sounds like you’ve got “issues”.
The irony . . . π
8 ton payload was also confirmed.