C-17 arrived today
Majority of the posts are a result of egos.. :rolleyes:
I liked what F-22 did.. definitely tells that the engines would not surge out of lack of air..
I also liked what the Flanker and Fulcrums do… also tells the similar capabilities from the engine POV..
rest.. why are we comparing the other stuff as stealth/tactics here.. F-22 or Flanker in itself are nothing when they are used out of their respective SYSTEMS… I mean.. these aircrafts are to be used by their forces as a part of their fighting WINGS/SYSTEM where every damn single small or big aircraft/personnel/logistics/etc/etc matter..
silly comparisons.. is’nt it..
OK folks the birds have started arriving..
http://forums.bharat-rakshak.com/viewtopic.php?t=2877
First are the Swedes with their Gripen
I think the questions needs to be “is India getting a good return on its vast investment”?
Scooter.. this is very subjective.. can you highlight as to what GOOD RETURN would mean..
Hi Vikas.. the report is correct but how we would interpret it is the key here..
According to the contract.. HAL is receiving 100% TOT for the complete 30-MKI program, which includes the engines, radars.. to even the rivets.. 🙂 .. this whole technology absorption is to happen in the first 5-7 years of the local program inception..
The original plan was to build 140 aricrafts till 2017. But because of this delay and politics of MMRCA/MRCA crap.. IAF is under the pressure to maintain the squadron strengths which are already coming down in numbers because of numberplating.. IAF is also under the pressure now to maintain it’s strength in relation to the growing geopolitical and economic strength of India at present and for future..
This has all lead to urgency in speeding up the 30-MKI program and advancing the final delivery of the 140’th India manufactured aircraft from 2017 to 2014..
Because of this compressed timeframe.. although 100% TOT would be done.. facilities would NOT be setup locally to manufacture some of the components that would be best imported from Russia..
I just hope that cleared some mist.. please be free to ask any more doubts if you have…
BTW… even the original contract mentioned 100% TOT and NOT 100% local manufacture.. because there were some components of the BARS that were to be imported even in the original plan.. because it would not make business sense to make them here…
For every Mig-29 lover.. this is a wonderful place to visit..
btw.. 29K would look fabulous when painted in the ghost gray colour scheme of IN..
Flex.. check out more about 29K at.. .
http://forums.bharat-rakshak.com/viewtopic.php?t=2584&start=280
Mig-35 getting ready for AeroIndia 2007..
First of all.. let’s not stoop to the low.. where to project ourselves good.. we would have to prove the other person low… I am as much appreciative of the Chinese efforts as I am of Indian efforts be it any field..
Scooter.. USA could afford multiple aircraft project failures over such a VAST years……. we cannot.. please think from our POV..
other is that MRCA/MMRCA etc is nothing but terms that came in because of politics at the geopolitical level when the government changed..
IAF wanted only additional Mirages.. to complement the additional squadrons from Dassault..
New GOI said.. no orders from single vendor.. they would go for tender..
Problem started here..
now USG was getting closer to GOI and they introduced there platforms as F-18 first and then after some time F-16 was pitted..
Europe saw this move as politically/strategically significant.. and they introduced there platforms too.. Rafael and Typhoon.. French who would have benefitted the most under the original plan suffered..
It’s all a mess now.. because after Kargil when a lot single vendor purchases were made and that got into controversies.. the current GOI has framed new set of rules for all the purchases and these rules comes strictly with a tender process for MAJORITY.. .. and it has also started using foreign purchases in the political mileages at the geopolitical level….
It’s a big mess now… I am not very positive as to who will benefit the most.. but I do see that IAF is suffering.. time lost cannot be brought back.. and I hold GOI responsible for it outright..
With due respect to all the members out here..
Please consider following when saying this is the best/worst deal etc etc..
Political climate and relations of GOI with the countries
Finance kitty availaible to IN in current and future projections
There priorities in allocation of these tight finances
Limitations of the shipyards today and there future upgrade plans
AND VERY IMPORTANT
Inefficiencies in the Indian Bureaucratic setup
along with
Political strings… (Classic case of IAF rejecting the good F-4 deal from US after China war in 62 because of such political strings…)
a couple more maybe……
Gorky may not be the best re-furb deal.. but what was/were the realistic options availaible to IN at that time.. gorky deal in itself stretched for so long… like other deals.. as HAWK and SCORPENE to name a very few..
As for the aircraft onboard the Gorky.. please consider the political strings attached to the deal ….everything is not in IN’s hand… ex CNS Prakash liked Rafael a lot.. he was/is also very appreciative of the JSF and it’s qualities… but he still cannot have them because of the points I have mentioned above..
Let’s all consider and review the design and development of the IAC 1 first rather then speculating about the IAC 2/3/4/5/6 etc etc… It’s fine to construct a hull.. what’s even more important would be the standards followed… quality adhered to.. and the system integration…. (where we always lag behind in ordering the system on time first… )
In my Dreams.. I would like to work with Russia getting there Project 1153 OREL blueprints and working further on this and modifying it with best of electronics and self defence equipment from Europe/Russia and getting the US Capapults..
Order for 8 of such types with IN getting 6 and russia keeping 2…with the 2 for IN being built in Russia and rest being built at CSL in India… Aircraft for IN would be JSF and N-LCA with appropriate support systems…. :diablo:
Don’t know about this particular order.. but IN is seriously looking into these..
And Why is that ?? Not the production capability but why do you think the F-35 to not be worthy ??
🙂 because production capability of this order is much more time/money consuming for us then designing this an aircraft of such high standards..
otherwise.. I think I went overboard in saying that production capability to be level up.. but sure it is indeed as important as the design of the aircraft itself..
How’s the Embraer-190 as a platform for the LRMP…
Designing and developing the production line/technology is as important as the aircraft itself.. I would rather keep it a level above the aircraft design ….
I (am an India) would have loved to have the production technology/capability of this order then the aircraft itself.. 🙂