dark light

StevoJH

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 346 through 360 (of 987 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: LPH's (mistral, Ocean, etc)what are your views on them #2014727
    StevoJH
    Participant

    I don’t like the way Mistral is arranged. Vehicle Deck’s and Hanger are all at the stern above the dock, with the entire front half of the ship turned over the troops.

    I like the Arrangment of the JCI/Canberra with a full length hanger/vehicle deck better.

    in reply to: Australia: Green light to buy Joint Strike Fighters #2416222
    StevoJH
    Participant

    The price drop during the crisis easily outbalances several years of inflation..

    Price drop? what price drop? :rolleyes:

    Prices never go down in Australia, they always go up, up, up.

    in reply to: F-22, Typhoon, Rafale, and F16's Block 60 #2416372
    StevoJH
    Participant

    He is indeed a Tornado F.3 driver. But hey don’t we know that the Rafale is much better than the F-22 because Peter Collins said he would take it anytime over any other aircraft?

    I’d be adding to the end of that “any other aircraft he has flown”.

    He hasnt flown Typhoon or F-22.

    in reply to: Does Russia want to keep the ex-Gorshkov??? #2014821
    StevoJH
    Participant

    I see a Russian Flag……

    in reply to: Australia: Green light to buy Joint Strike Fighters #2416935
    StevoJH
    Participant

    Yes, they have risen since then and again fallen down, just like everything else. Quite frankly, I think cars were equally expensive back in 2001 than they are now.. Why not aircraft?

    No they arent, they arent here anyway. Its a little something called inflation.

    in reply to: F-22, Typhoon, Rafale, and F16's Block 60 #2417297
    StevoJH
    Participant

    You can trust Collins. Remember he did not compare Rafale to Typhoon or F-22 because he has not flown them, because of this you cannot use this article to say that the rafale is better then the F-22 or Typhoon because they were not compared. What can be said is that the Rafale is a fantastic fighter compared to the previous aircraft he has flown and that he would be happy to fight in it.

    As for journalists, I’d take anything they said with a grain of salt.

    in reply to: Australia: Green light to buy Joint Strike Fighters #2417300
    StevoJH
    Participant

    A decision is planned for 2012 on upgrading 12 of the F/A-18F to EA-18G. Same year a decision on the followon F-35A purchase for a total of 72. Later in 2010s a decision is due on the last 28.

    So its either one squadron of F/A-18F (possibly some as EA-18G) and three F-35 or four F-35 squadrons. Preferred choice is 4 F-35 squadrons.

    The AU$6 billion is for 24 F/A-18F (unit cost probably $65 million – US?) with the adiditional costs for 10 years flying including support (its either expensive setting up depot level maintenance in Australia or equally(?) expensive back in the USA, simulator integration and three years training.

    Confirmed weapons are AIM-9X, ATFLIR, AGM-154C-1, JASSM, buddy stores along with JHMCS and NVG.

    HUG (Hornet Upgrade Program) is an ongoing phased upgrade.
    2000 – 2002: HUG1.0 with new CNI with embedded GPS, secure comms, IFF interrogator, upgraded databus, interim EW software upgrade, ASRAAM wiring. 59 converted by March 2002.
    2002-2003: HUG 2.1 with APG-73 vice APG-65. 14 were actually deployed to Al Udeid, Qatar during the Iraq invasion and flew attack and attack missions.
    2006-08: HUG 2.1 with ALE-47 decoys, JMCS, Link 16. 55 delivered by Dec 2007 (IOC). HUG 2.4 ran same years with AAQ-28V Litening AT Block II targeting pods (IOC Jun 2007).
    2007-11: HUG 3.2C for 10 airframes (was 49 with 20 options), as the airframe fatigue was found to be less than expected.
    2008-11: HUG 2.3 with ALR-67(v)3 RWR (IOC Nov 08)
    2009: Fitted with BOL chaff decioys.
    2011-12: HUG 2.3 with El-8222 jammer pods

    Originally planned
    2012-15: Non 3.2C retired. This is moved to the right two years.
    2017-18: HUG 3.2C with option to extend to 2020.

    With the F-35 delays the F/A-18F takes the pressure off the F/A-18A retirement dates.

    Nice Detail….

    Even if your last name is Goon (is it?) that is nice detail.

    in reply to: Australia: Green light to buy Joint Strike Fighters #2418341
    StevoJH
    Participant

    I think they actually have the option to return the SH to the US if they are not too old and worn out? Although I have no idea aboutthe details of that arrangement.

    F-18F’s are supposed to be returned to the USN circa-2025.

    in reply to: Australia: Green light to buy Joint Strike Fighters #2418365
    StevoJH
    Participant

    Well if you ask me the F/A18E/F was a mistake. They should have MLUd their current fleet and make them last until the JSF arrived (provided they wanted it that bad). Save that they could rent a plane (I can think of a lot of available Gripens) as a transitory measure that would cost much less that purchasing such an expensive stopgap.

    Nic

    The F18F’s were a stopgap replacement for the F-111’s. They required something insane like 170-180 hours of maintenance per flight hours. It was probably cheaper to replace them with the F18F’s then to keep them in service another 5-6 years.

    Plus the early replacement of the F-111’s means that the F/A-18’s can be withrawn earlier, removing the need to carry out CBR on most of the fleet.

    in reply to: Australia: Green light to buy Joint Strike Fighters #2433121
    StevoJH
    Participant

    Look, jackjack.
    LM designs and produces the aircraft.
    Once, the design is over and LM produces tools and exports them according to workshare table to partner countries, the production can start.

    Not exactly how it works. Lockhead releases a specification for a part (lets say the engine), subcontractors, in this case the PW team and the RR team submit designs. These designs are then the property of those teams and are built on tooling belonging by those teams. That is the situation for pretty much every part of the aircraft except for parts the Lockhead specifically developed themselves. Even half the fuselage is being built by BAe from memory.

    In the meantime, what will Australia test?
    Australia doesn’t even have software authorization.

    Nothing until 2014. You don’t need access to the software to develop doctrine for the use of the platform.

    What spares? F35/F135 aren’t even ready yet.
    How can Australia build infrastructure when LM didn’t put the plane together yet? What are the specifications?

    F135 is ready, it is powering all F35’s currently flying. Development of the F135 will continue throughout the lifetime of the aircraft.
    Initial Production standard versions of the F35A are flying, so you are wrong there as well.
    Infrastructure may range from replacement of current hangers, upgrading to hard stands, anything that is needed “dirtside” to support F-35. These things can all be done now.

    As for weapon integration. It’s LM job, not Australia’s. LM even integrates Israel’s equipment. Does Australia have any indigenous weapons for F35?

    Lockhead may carry out the integration, however the integration has to be paid for by the people who want the weapon integrated. For example, the UK might want to integrate meteor, they then have to pay for that integration.

    Once you answer these questions you’ll see that testing & infrastructure is academic point, at best.

    Is it?

    Just look what happened with F35B and jet blast deck problems for Marine’s assault carriers. Is Australia going to rebuild infrastructure again, once the actual F35A rolls out of factory?

    The “Actual” F35A has already rolled out of the factory.

    Don’t ask me…

    I didn’t.

    in reply to: Australia: Green light to buy Joint Strike Fighters #2433167
    StevoJH
    Participant

    This is a Benny Hill show. 😀

    $214m per plane. 😀

    That would include infrastructure upgrades, spares, possibly some weapons integration etc.

    Ready for testing after paying $214m per plane??!! 😀

    More like training the pilots how to use it properly and developing techniques to best utilise its features.

    And finally we came to the source of the thing. Since F35 isn’t a strategic aricraft, I wonder what would that strategic capability be, hmmm? 😉

    It allows us to maintain our strategic ability to dominate the airspace of our region.

    LOL, how noble of government to take the risks with taxpayer’s money…Hahahaha…

    Risks? What risks?

    in reply to: Australia: Green light to buy Joint Strike Fighters #2433239
    StevoJH
    Participant

    Ahh all the fanboys and flag wavers rejoice, while the rest of us here cringe…

    Why are the fanboi’s (you have to say it the right way you know) rejoicing and “the rest of us” cringing? 😉

    Now in opposition, the Shadow Defence Minister is up in arms about the cost…

    Its called politics. They are trying to draw attention away from the Internal Conflict going on within the Liberal Party/Coalition.

    in reply to: F-35 News and Discussion #2433245
    StevoJH
    Participant

    Australian Government just approved the purchase of 14 F-35A’s, with a second order of 58 Aircraft to follow in 2012.

    in reply to: F-35 News and Discussion #2433331
    StevoJH
    Participant

    I don’t think Britain can afford to develop a fighter on its own at the present financial state.

    Making Eurofighter Carrier Capable and ditching the F 35 is more realistic although like you said they probably won’t have the balls for it. 😉

    Replica + Typhoon Avoinics + Transferring funds and People from one or more UCAV programs = Win!

    in reply to: Japan to consider F/A-22 to replace its F-4s #2433675
    StevoJH
    Participant

    ]
    Also, air-to-ship missions are rare. In the ’82 Falklands, the Super Etendards shot IIRC only five air-launched Exocets; the one that hit the HMS Glamorgan was ground-launched.

    They only had five of the air launched version, the French refused to deliver the remainder of the Argentine Order when they invaded the Falklands.

    In the ’91 Second (Persian) Gulf War (or Desert Shield/Desert Storm), IIRC a Canadian AF CF-18 on SURCAP (surface CAP) strafed and fired a Sidewinder at a fleeing Iraqi gunboat, but missed.

    RN Lynx Helicoptors had a field day shooting Iraqi gunboats with Sea Skua during that conflict.

    F-2s were in active service for years, before one was written off.

    F-2’s are tasked with Anti-Shipping duties in the JASDF.

Viewing 15 posts - 346 through 360 (of 987 total)