dark light

MSR777

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,981 through 1,995 (of 3,046 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Photo from Lanzarote – Canary Islands #457738
    MSR777
    Participant

    Great shot! Thanx for sharing.

    in reply to: Any flying Boeing 720 around??? #525368
    MSR777
    Participant

    I used to do turnrounds on a/s Conair 720B aircraft at STN in the mid 80s, one of which was non ‘B’ “coal burner” example. πŸ™‚

    in reply to: Ryanair's check-in fiasco at Stansted #525511
    MSR777
    Participant

    Ah, sorry Andy….fully understand. πŸ™‚

    in reply to: Ryanair's check-in fiasco at Stansted #525680
    MSR777
    Participant

    From the Ryanair web site today:

    Ryanair, the world’s favourite airline, today (5 Aug) announced that its passenger traffic grew by 19% in July 2009 to 6.7m passengers which is a new monthly traffic record for Europe’s largest low fares airline.

    But at what cost to the industry as a whole? As far as Swissport is concerned they go after the business because they have an income to earn and shareholders to feed, even handling that bunch. Ryanair have made no secret of the fact that if they could get by without handling agents then they would. Many check in staff lost their jobs with the introduction of the much vaunted “self check-in system”, alot of good that was on the day! and Swissport had to adjust their business model accordingly to take the vagueries of this outfit into account. Staffing for handling these days is even more “knife edge” than in my time in handling, resulting in very little, if any, slack in the system, Ryanair should be aware of this. Rostering for the Ryanair operation must be a bloody nightmare. Sorry Andy, normally you and I are on common ground ref this confounded carrier but I don’t think
    that in this case its right to label Swisport staff as monkeys, and as for getting to Carcassone for a few pence it might be as well to remember that it has cost some in our industry dear to enable that to happen…nothing personal.;) I can well remember sitting in in a negotiation with a based “low cost carrier” and the situation was that we were expected to tender to turn around a fully loaded 737-400 using 4 staff! In the real world it meant allocating a min of 5 to achieve that so person 5 was at our companies expense, so we would have been losing out from the start had our MD not decided that handing that carrier was just not worth it. I was also instructed by that carrier on many occasions to manipulate and alter the delay codes in movement messages so that our company was made to look responsible for the delay thereby incurring the dreaded penalty payments. I narrowly avoided a disciplinary hearing for refusing the airlines Station Managers requests to alter the codes until I proved what was going on to my senior management. I’ve seen this ‘Low Cost” scenario close up, and it stinks! Don’t use it.:mad:

    in reply to: Monarch and their A300s #526232
    MSR777
    Participant

    Maybe we will see Monarch cancel the 787 orders!!

    The A350 must be looking increasingly attractive to them (and others) πŸ˜‰

    in reply to: A319 OLYMPIC AIRLINES NEW COLOURS 17/7/2009 #458098
    MSR777
    Participant

    Have waited some time to see images of those Olympic A319s. Nice shots and much appreciated πŸ™‚

    in reply to: Wee bit of sun at Glasgow today #458104
    MSR777
    Participant

    Great shots. Good to see that the Russian links with Glasgow still alive and well. When I was employed with a Scottish carrier Air Ecosse at Aberdeen in a previous life, I often used to get down to GLA on hearing news of a visiting Aeroflot Tu134 or Interflug and Tarom IL18s. Thanx for those Yak images.

    in reply to: Glasgow 29/7/09 #458108
    MSR777
    Participant

    Gotta love that Yak! Great shots.

    in reply to: Tonight @ Norwich. #458147
    MSR777
    Participant

    Very nice images. Thanx. πŸ™‚

    in reply to: Monarch and their A300s #526386
    MSR777
    Participant

    As I understand things, the Boeing 787 will replace their A300’s.

    Monarch had better get some major life extending engineering done on those A300s if thats the case.;)

    in reply to: Iran plane fire kills 16 #526388
    MSR777
    Participant

    Brilliantly put! Especially the end of the final line.

    in reply to: Iran plane fire kills 16 #526595
    MSR777
    Participant

    If that IL62 is Kazakh then it will almost certainly be one of the ex Interflug machines as this is where most of their IL62Ms ended up after overhaul at the Tashkent repair facility. Some were sold on to other carriers and a few went to Aeroflot. This example definately shows the slightly modified Interflug scheme which really only consisted of deleted titles, DDR flag on tail fin and deleted stylised “Flying Star” insignia which was done before the aircraft departed Schonefeld for Tashkent.

    in reply to: Maybe the first "civil" Beoing C-17…. #526601
    MSR777
    Participant

    Dear god looks horrible in the Qatar Colors!

    Taken from Skyliner world!

    http://www.skyliner-aviation.de/photos/A7-MAB.jpg

    Agreed! Colours would look much nicer on an IL76;)

    in reply to: Iran plane fire kills 16 #528145
    MSR777
    Participant

    Are you saying the US embargo is to blame then?

    I hardly think that Iran has “poorly trained” crews or ancient equipment…
    There are dozens of third rate airlines world wide who still fly worldwide is older aircraft and more pityful conditions.

    The fact remains that people died…. and that the cause of the accident will probably never be known in the “west” simply because its “Iran”. The lack of media coverage when a disaster or major accident occurs outside the “western” world reaks.

    Its not news worthy simply because it may show they are human after all…

    Point well made. It looks like a former Interflug Il62M. If the reports on here are accurate it would seem to suggest some kind of crew error if the aircraft had landed so far down the runway, but then the crew are not here to defend themselves so its speculation. The Il62 has a high landing speed coupled with a lack of leading edge slats, at Stansted we often used to see them deploying reverse thrust whilst passing over the runway threshold to assist in reducing the touchdown speed although according to a Cubana pilot that I met on a turnround this does not present a problem. The BBC video seems to show the reverse thrust ‘buckets’ were deployed although the cause of the accident may never be known in the “west”. Try tuning in to the Press TV channel from Tehran on Sky, there was good coverage of the recent Tupolev crash on there.

    in reply to: Ryanair reduces Stansted flights #528769
    MSR777
    Participant

    Same ‘ol same ‘ol Mol, ie: Its evryone elses fault except Ryanair. Here we go again, all the old toys in the corner! Perhaps this “dear man” should take a leaf out of the airport operators, service providers and other airlines books and start charging realistic fares allied to the real costs of operating one of his crates from A to B, instead of relying on selling quartz driven cruet sets and cuddly toys onboard along with the lousy charges for baggage, check in and goodness knows what all. Welcome to the real world and costs of operating an airline sir. Perhaps a quiet word in the ear of your favourite plane maker may bring some help.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,981 through 1,995 (of 3,046 total)