dark light

MSR777

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,281 through 2,295 (of 3,046 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Narrow runway or wide a/c? #617170
    MSR777
    Participant

    Not much room for error there!

    in reply to: Narrow runway or wide a/c? #689851
    MSR777
    Participant

    Not much room for error there!

    in reply to: Albanian: new aircraft, new livery #617173
    MSR777
    Participant

    Very nice indeed. Could be some years before Albania has need of one. I flew with Albanian Airlines on a Tu134A a few years back although I think it was on lease from a Bulgarian company (Hemus Air?).

    in reply to: Albanian: new aircraft, new livery #689853
    MSR777
    Participant

    Very nice indeed. Could be some years before Albania has need of one. I flew with Albanian Airlines on a Tu134A a few years back although I think it was on lease from a Bulgarian company (Hemus Air?).

    in reply to: CSA #617898
    MSR777
    Participant

    Beautifully put.

    in reply to: CSA #691519
    MSR777
    Participant

    Beautifully put.

    in reply to: Oeps………………… #618226
    MSR777
    Participant

    That had to hurt!!!

    in reply to: Oeps………………… #692345
    MSR777
    Participant

    That had to hurt!!!

    in reply to: CSA #618227
    MSR777
    Participant

    Lets be honest, none of us knows the long term strategy of the CSA management. My guess, and its only that, is that the airline is opting for the flexabilty that the commonality of the Airbus family offers across virtually its entire range, surely if your looking at an almost total fleet rollover in the coming years this has to be a major consideration for CSA or anyone else. Boeing simply does not have this level of compatability across its types with the possible exception of the 737 family, and even some of those versions are getting “long in the tooth”. For this reason alone I’m not surprised at the decision, Tarom made a similar one I seem to remember. IMO its indicative of the work that Boeing still has to do to secure orders of this kind, its too glib to call it political.

    in reply to: CSA #692348
    MSR777
    Participant

    Lets be honest, none of us knows the long term strategy of the CSA management. My guess, and its only that, is that the airline is opting for the flexabilty that the commonality of the Airbus family offers across virtually its entire range, surely if your looking at an almost total fleet rollover in the coming years this has to be a major consideration for CSA or anyone else. Boeing simply does not have this level of compatability across its types with the possible exception of the 737 family, and even some of those versions are getting “long in the tooth”. For this reason alone I’m not surprised at the decision, Tarom made a similar one I seem to remember. IMO its indicative of the work that Boeing still has to do to secure orders of this kind, its too glib to call it political.

    in reply to: Iberia To Take Ryanair To Court #619091
    MSR777
    Participant

    No doubt Ryanair will cry “victimisation!” or some such drivel. As I’ve said before, lets have a level playing field ( and I mean level ) for both the LoCos and the full service guys, but then again could the LoCos survive without the subsidies??

    in reply to: Iberia To Take Ryanair To Court #694674
    MSR777
    Participant

    No doubt Ryanair will cry “victimisation!” or some such drivel. As I’ve said before, lets have a level playing field ( and I mean level ) for both the LoCos and the full service guys, but then again could the LoCos survive without the subsidies??

    in reply to: Cargo aircraft crashes in Canada #619104
    MSR777
    Participant

    Sad news however it turns out.

    in reply to: Cargo aircraft crashes in Canada #694690
    MSR777
    Participant

    Sad news however it turns out.

    in reply to: Airbus A350 #619132
    MSR777
    Participant

    ‘Ere we go again……….Y..A..W..N……….!

Viewing 15 posts - 2,281 through 2,295 (of 3,046 total)